[Epilepsy and inequality: demographic description and analysis of the difficulty in accessing advanced resources in a population in a small health area].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revista de neurologia Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.33588/rn.7711.2023262
V M Pérez-Navarro, M Cánovas-Iniesta, B Palazón-Cabanes, M Navarro-Lozano
{"title":"[Epilepsy and inequality: demographic description and analysis of the difficulty in accessing advanced resources in a population in a small health area].","authors":"V M Pérez-Navarro, M Cánovas-Iniesta, B Palazón-Cabanes, M Navarro-Lozano","doi":"10.33588/rn.7711.2023262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Epilepsy is a very common neurological disease with high morbidity and mortality. Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) poses a major therapeutic challenge, even for experts in the field. Despite this, access to advanced resources for this type of patient remains difficult and unequal. The aim of this study is to analyse inequality in a population belonging to a first level hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>An analytical observational cross-sectional study was conducted on epileptic patients attending neurology consultations in Area IX of the Murcian Health Service. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, prognostic and equity variables are described, and significant differences between different subgroups are analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 68 patients with a mean age of 42.93 years. Focal epilepsy was the main type (64.7%), and the most commonly used drugs were levetiracetam (33.8%), valproic acid (27.9%) and lamotrigine (22.1%). DRE occurred in 18 patients (26.5% of the total) and only four were under active follow-up in an epilepsy unit, meaning that 71% did not have access to a necessary resource (advanced therapeutic gap).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that epilepsy inequality continues to be a problem, especially in certain geographical areas, with a lack of access to advanced care for patients who need it most. The solution can be achieved by increasing human and material resources to improve overall patient care, thus strengthening both referral hospitals and epilepsy units.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"77 11","pages":"259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10831705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7711.2023262","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Epilepsy is a very common neurological disease with high morbidity and mortality. Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) poses a major therapeutic challenge, even for experts in the field. Despite this, access to advanced resources for this type of patient remains difficult and unequal. The aim of this study is to analyse inequality in a population belonging to a first level hospital.

Patients and methods: An analytical observational cross-sectional study was conducted on epileptic patients attending neurology consultations in Area IX of the Murcian Health Service. Demographic, clinical, therapeutic, prognostic and equity variables are described, and significant differences between different subgroups are analysed.

Results: The study included 68 patients with a mean age of 42.93 years. Focal epilepsy was the main type (64.7%), and the most commonly used drugs were levetiracetam (33.8%), valproic acid (27.9%) and lamotrigine (22.1%). DRE occurred in 18 patients (26.5% of the total) and only four were under active follow-up in an epilepsy unit, meaning that 71% did not have access to a necessary resource (advanced therapeutic gap).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that epilepsy inequality continues to be a problem, especially in certain geographical areas, with a lack of access to advanced care for patients who need it most. The solution can be achieved by increasing human and material resources to improve overall patient care, thus strengthening both referral hospitals and epilepsy units.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[癫痫与不平等:人口统计描述和小卫生领域人口获取先进资源的困难分析]。
癫痫是一种非常常见的神经系统疾病,发病率和死亡率都很高。即使对该领域的专家来说,耐药癫痫(DRE)也是一项重大的治疗挑战。尽管如此,这类患者获得先进资源仍然困难且不平等。本研究的目的是分析属于一级医院的人口中的不平等现象。患者和方法:一项分析性观察性横断面研究对在穆尔西亚卫生服务第九区参加神经内科会诊的癫痫患者进行了研究。描述了人口统计学、临床、治疗、预后和公平性变量,并分析了不同亚组之间的显著差异。结果:纳入68例患者,平均年龄42.93岁。局灶性癫痫为主要类型(64.7%),常用药物为左乙拉西坦(33.8%)、丙戊酸(27.9%)和拉莫三嗪(22.1%)。18名患者(占总数的26.5%)发生了DRE,只有4名患者在癫痫病房接受了积极随访,这意味着71%的患者无法获得必要的资源(先进的治疗差距)。结论:这项研究表明,癫痫不平等仍然是一个问题,特别是在某些地理区域,最需要的患者缺乏获得高级护理的机会。解决办法可以通过增加人力和物力资源来改善病人的整体护理,从而加强转诊医院和癫痫科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Boxing Training on Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Referral Profile of Adult Patients Attended in the Neuropsychology Consultation at Hospital Universitario La Paz in Madrid from 2018 to 2023]. [Characteristics of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary hospital]. [Glioblastoma and its interaction with neurogenesis]. [The p-value of a test is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1