Comparison of early wound healing using modified papilla preservation technique between enamel matrix derivative and recombinant human fibroblast growth factor.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.5051/jpis.2303080154
Yohei Nakayama, Shinichi Tabe, Kazuma Igarashi, Satoshi Moriya, Tsuyoshi Katsumata, Ryo Kobayashi, Shuta Nakagawa, Tomoko Nishino, Namiko Fukuoka, Kota Hosono, Mai Yamasaki, Yosuke Yamazaki, Moe Ogihara-Takeda, Shoichi Ito, Yumi Saito, Arisa Yamaguchi, Yuto Tsuruya, Mizuho Yamazaki-Takai, Shoichi Yoshino, Hideki Takai, Yorimasa Ogata
{"title":"Comparison of early wound healing using modified papilla preservation technique between enamel matrix derivative and recombinant human fibroblast growth factor.","authors":"Yohei Nakayama, Shinichi Tabe, Kazuma Igarashi, Satoshi Moriya, Tsuyoshi Katsumata, Ryo Kobayashi, Shuta Nakagawa, Tomoko Nishino, Namiko Fukuoka, Kota Hosono, Mai Yamasaki, Yosuke Yamazaki, Moe Ogihara-Takeda, Shoichi Ito, Yumi Saito, Arisa Yamaguchi, Yuto Tsuruya, Mizuho Yamazaki-Takai, Shoichi Yoshino, Hideki Takai, Yorimasa Ogata","doi":"10.5051/jpis.2303080154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has demonstrated beneficial effects on wound healing following surgery. However, the effects of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 2 (rhFGF-2) in periodontal regeneration therapy have not been extensively studied. This retrospective study was conducted to compare the wound healing outcomes of the modified papilla preservation technique (mPPT) between EMD and rhFGF-2 therapies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 79 sites were evaluated for early wound healing using the modified early wound healing index (mEHI), which included 6 items: incision, fibrin clotting, step, redness, swelling, and dehiscence. A numeric analog scale, along with postoperative images of the 6 mEHI items, was established and used for the evaluations. The inter-rater reliability of the mEHI was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). After adjusting for factors influencing the mPPT, the differences in mEHI scores between the EMD and rhFGF-2 groups were statistically analyzed. Additionally, radiographic bone fill (RBF) was evaluated 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ICC of the mEHI was 0.575. The mEHI, redness score, and dehiscence scores were significantly higher in the rhFGF-2 group (n=33) than in the EMD group (n=46). Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients aged 50 years or older, but not in those younger than 50 years. In the subgroup with non-contained bone defects, related results were noted, but not in the subgroup with contained bone defects. However, early wound healing did not correlate with RBF at 6 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, the findings suggest that early wound healing following the use of mPPT with rhFGF-2 is somewhat superior to that observed after mPPT with EMD. However, mEHI should be improved for use as a predictive tool for early wound healing and to reflect clinical outcomes after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","volume":" ","pages":"236-252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2303080154","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has demonstrated beneficial effects on wound healing following surgery. However, the effects of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor 2 (rhFGF-2) in periodontal regeneration therapy have not been extensively studied. This retrospective study was conducted to compare the wound healing outcomes of the modified papilla preservation technique (mPPT) between EMD and rhFGF-2 therapies.

Methods: A total of 79 sites were evaluated for early wound healing using the modified early wound healing index (mEHI), which included 6 items: incision, fibrin clotting, step, redness, swelling, and dehiscence. A numeric analog scale, along with postoperative images of the 6 mEHI items, was established and used for the evaluations. The inter-rater reliability of the mEHI was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). After adjusting for factors influencing the mPPT, the differences in mEHI scores between the EMD and rhFGF-2 groups were statistically analyzed. Additionally, radiographic bone fill (RBF) was evaluated 6 months after surgery.

Results: The ICC of the mEHI was 0.575. The mEHI, redness score, and dehiscence scores were significantly higher in the rhFGF-2 group (n=33) than in the EMD group (n=46). Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients aged 50 years or older, but not in those younger than 50 years. In the subgroup with non-contained bone defects, related results were noted, but not in the subgroup with contained bone defects. However, early wound healing did not correlate with RBF at 6 months after surgery.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the findings suggest that early wound healing following the use of mPPT with rhFGF-2 is somewhat superior to that observed after mPPT with EMD. However, mEHI should be improved for use as a predictive tool for early wound healing and to reflect clinical outcomes after surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良乳头保存技术在牙釉质基质衍生物和重组人成纤维细胞生长因子早期创面愈合中的比较。
目的:牙釉质基质衍生物(EMD)对术后创面愈合有良好的促进作用。然而,重组人成纤维细胞生长因子2 (rhFGF-2)在牙周再生治疗中的作用尚未得到广泛的研究。本回顾性研究比较了改良乳头保存技术(mPPT)在EMD和rhFGF-2治疗中的伤口愈合效果。方法:采用改良早期创面愈合指数(mEHI)对79处创面进行早期愈合评价,该指数包括切口、纤维蛋白凝血、台阶、红肿、开裂6个项目。建立一个数值模拟量表,连同6个mEHI项目的术后图像,并用于评估。通过类内相关系数(ICCs)评估mEHI的等级间信度。在调整影响mPPT的因素后,统计分析EMD组和rhFGF-2组mEHI评分的差异。此外,术后6个月评估x线骨填充(RBF)。结果:mEHI的ICC值为0.575。rhFGF-2组mEHI、发红评分和裂开评分(n=33)显著高于EMD组(n=46)。在50岁或以上的亚组患者中观察到类似的结果,但在50岁以下的患者中则没有。在非含骨缺损亚组中有相关结果,但在含骨缺损亚组中无相关结果。然而,术后6个月早期伤口愈合与RBF无关。结论:在本研究的局限性内,研究结果表明,mPPT联合rhFGF-2使用后的早期伤口愈合程度略优于mPPT联合EMD。然而,mEHI作为早期伤口愈合的预测工具和反映手术后的临床结果应该得到改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science (JPIS) is a peer-reviewed and open-access journal providing up-to-date information relevant to professionalism of periodontology and dental implantology. JPIS is dedicated to global and extensive publication which includes evidence-based original articles, and fundamental reviews in order to cover a variety of interests in the field of periodontal as well as implant science.
期刊最新文献
Does defect configuration affect the outcomes of alveolar ridge preservation? An experimental in vivo study. Comprehensive treatment protocol for peri-implantitis: an up-to date narrative review of the literature. Guided bone regeneration of calcium phosphate-coated and strontium ranelate-doped titanium mesh in a rat calvarial defect model. Soft-tissue volume augmentation using a connective tissue graft and a volume-stable collagen matrix with polydeoxyribonucleotide for immediate implant placement: a pilot study in a dog model. The activin/BMP-2 chimera AB204 promotes periodontal tissue regeneration in a buccal dehiscence model: a pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1