Mind over muscle? Time manipulation improves physical performance by slowing down the neuromuscular fatigue accumulation.

Psychophysiology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1111/psyp.14487
Pierre-Marie Matta, Dorian Glories, Andrea Alamia, Robin Baurès, Julien Duclay
{"title":"Mind over muscle? Time manipulation improves physical performance by slowing down the neuromuscular fatigue accumulation.","authors":"Pierre-Marie Matta, Dorian Glories, Andrea Alamia, Robin Baurès, Julien Duclay","doi":"10.1111/psyp.14487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While physical performance has long been thought to be limited only by physiological factors, many experiments denote that psychological ones can also influence it. Specifically, the deception paradigm investigates the effect of psychological factors on performance by manipulating a psychological variable unbeknownst to the subjects. For example, during a physical exercise performed to failure, previous results revealed an improvement in performance (i.e., holding time) when the clock shown to the subjects was deceptively slowed down. However, the underlying neurophysiological changes supporting this performance improvement due to deceptive time manipulation remain unknown. Here, we addressed this issue by investigating from a neuromuscular perspective the effect of a deceptive clock manipulation on a single-joint isometric task conducted to failure in 24 healthy participants (11 females). Neuromuscular fatigue was assessed by pre- to post-exercise changes in quadriceps maximal voluntary torque (T<sub>max</sub> ), voluntary activation level (VAL), and potentiated twitch (T<sub>TW</sub> ). Our main results indicated a significant performance improvement when the clock was slowed down (Biased: 356 ± 118 s vs. Normal: 332 ± 112 s, p = .036) but, surprisingly, without any difference in the associated neuromuscular fatigue (p > .05 and BF < 0.3 for T<sub>max</sub> , VAL, and T<sub>TW</sub> between both sessions). Computational modeling showed that, when observed, the holding time improvement was explained by a neuromuscular fatigue accumulation based on subjective rather than actual time. These results support a psychological influence on neuromuscular processes and contribute significantly to the literature on the mind-body influence, by challenging our understanding of fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":94182,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While physical performance has long been thought to be limited only by physiological factors, many experiments denote that psychological ones can also influence it. Specifically, the deception paradigm investigates the effect of psychological factors on performance by manipulating a psychological variable unbeknownst to the subjects. For example, during a physical exercise performed to failure, previous results revealed an improvement in performance (i.e., holding time) when the clock shown to the subjects was deceptively slowed down. However, the underlying neurophysiological changes supporting this performance improvement due to deceptive time manipulation remain unknown. Here, we addressed this issue by investigating from a neuromuscular perspective the effect of a deceptive clock manipulation on a single-joint isometric task conducted to failure in 24 healthy participants (11 females). Neuromuscular fatigue was assessed by pre- to post-exercise changes in quadriceps maximal voluntary torque (Tmax ), voluntary activation level (VAL), and potentiated twitch (TTW ). Our main results indicated a significant performance improvement when the clock was slowed down (Biased: 356 ± 118 s vs. Normal: 332 ± 112 s, p = .036) but, surprisingly, without any difference in the associated neuromuscular fatigue (p > .05 and BF < 0.3 for Tmax , VAL, and TTW between both sessions). Computational modeling showed that, when observed, the holding time improvement was explained by a neuromuscular fatigue accumulation based on subjective rather than actual time. These results support a psychological influence on neuromuscular processes and contribute significantly to the literature on the mind-body influence, by challenging our understanding of fatigue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头脑胜过肌肉?时间控制通过减缓神经肌肉疲劳积累来改善身体表现。
虽然长期以来人们认为身体表现只受生理因素的限制,但许多实验表明,心理因素也会影响身体表现。具体来说,欺骗范式通过操纵被试不知道的心理变量来研究心理因素对表现的影响。例如,在一项失败的体育锻炼中,先前的结果显示,当显示给受试者的时钟被欺骗性地减慢时,他们的表现(即保持时间)有所改善。然而,由于欺骗性时间操纵,支持这种表现改善的潜在神经生理变化仍然未知。在这里,我们从神经肌肉的角度研究了欺骗性时钟操作对24名健康参与者(11名女性)单关节等距任务失败的影响,从而解决了这个问题。通过运动前后四头肌最大自主扭矩(Tmax)、自主激活水平(VAL)和增强抽搐(TTW)的变化来评估神经肌肉疲劳。我们的主要结果表明,当时钟减慢时,表现显著改善(偏差:356±118秒vs.正常:332±112秒,p = 0.036),但令人惊讶的是,相关的神经肌肉疲劳没有任何差异(p >)。两组间Tmax、VAL和TTW的BF < 0.3)。计算模型表明,当观察到,保持时间的改善是由基于主观而不是实际时间的神经肌肉疲劳积累来解释的。这些结果支持心理对神经肌肉过程的影响,并通过挑战我们对疲劳的理解,对身心影响的文献做出了重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How effort-based self-interest motivation shapes altruistic donation behavior and brain responses. Beyond peaks and troughs: Multiplexed performance monitoring signals in the EEG. Reduced reward responsiveness and depression vulnerability: Consideration of social contexts and implications for intervention. Moving toward reality: Electrocortical reactivity to naturalistic multimodal emotional videos. Mapping the routes of perception: Hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1