Surrogate-assisted investigation on influence of epistemic uncertainties on running safety of high-speed trains on bridges

Abstract

The operational safety of high-speed trains traversing ballasted bridges is contingent upon the prevention of the ballast destabilization, which can interrupt load transfer from the rail to the bridge. Current design regulations indirectly address this limit-state by specifying a threshold value for the vertical acceleration of the superstructure. This value represents the condition at which the inertial forces induced by train passage exceed the resistive forces. However, this approach is based on limited experimental data and the influence of numerous parameters remains unexplored. As a result, reliability analyses pertaining to running safety are hampered by a lack of knowledge, leading to greater epistemic uncertainties. In this study, the impact of such uncertainties on this dynamic system is investigated using surrogate-based Imprecise Structural Reliability Analysis (ISRA). For this purpose, parametric probability boxes are used to represent lower and upper bounds of the cumulative distribution function for basic random variables with epistemic uncertainties and surrogate models are adaptively trained to reduce computational costs. The obtained results show that neglecting the influence of epistemic uncertainties can lead to permissible operating train speed higher than the speed corresponding to the desired reliability level. In this study, an overestimation of about 13% was observed on average. Furthermore, the rough analyses carried out show that taking epistemic uncertainties into account can lead to a reduction of the system characteristic safety factor by up to 30%. This significant reduction underlines the importance of expanding the available knowledge on the phenomenon of ballast instability.