ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions

Reza Hadi Mogavi , Chao Deng , Justin Juho Kim , Pengyuan Zhou , Young D. Kwon , Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally , Ahmed Tlili , Simone Bassanelli , Antonio Bucchiarone , Sujit Gujar , Lennart E. Nacke , Pan Hui
{"title":"ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions","authors":"Reza Hadi Mogavi ,&nbsp;Chao Deng ,&nbsp;Justin Juho Kim ,&nbsp;Pengyuan Zhou ,&nbsp;Young D. Kwon ,&nbsp;Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally ,&nbsp;Ahmed Tlili ,&nbsp;Simone Bassanelli ,&nbsp;Antonio Bucchiarone ,&nbsp;Sujit Gujar ,&nbsp;Lennart E. Nacke ,&nbsp;Pan Hui","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To foster the development of pedagogically potent and ethically sound AI-integrated learning landscapes, it is pivotal to critically explore the perceptions and experiences of the users immersed in these contexts. In this study, we perform a thorough qualitative content analysis across four key social media platforms. Our goal is to understand the user experience (UX) and views of early adopters of ChatGPT across different educational sectors. The results of our research show that ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training. In social media dialogues, the topics most frequently associated with ChatGPT are <em>productivity</em>, <em>efficiency</em>, and <em>ethics</em>. Early adopters' attitudes towards ChatGPT are multifaceted. On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation. On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users. They worry about a potential overdependence on the AI system, which they fear might encourage superficial learning habits and erode students’ social and critical thinking skills. This dichotomy of opinions underscores the complexity of Human-AI Interaction in educational contexts. Our investigation adds depth to this ongoing discourse, providing crowd-sourced insights for educators and learners who are considering incorporating ChatGPT or similar generative AI tools into their pedagogical strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000270/pdfft?md5=e16714ccddd9036b5ccd2fd32a44df5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882123000270-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To foster the development of pedagogically potent and ethically sound AI-integrated learning landscapes, it is pivotal to critically explore the perceptions and experiences of the users immersed in these contexts. In this study, we perform a thorough qualitative content analysis across four key social media platforms. Our goal is to understand the user experience (UX) and views of early adopters of ChatGPT across different educational sectors. The results of our research show that ChatGPT is most commonly used in the domains of higher education, K-12 education, and practical skills training. In social media dialogues, the topics most frequently associated with ChatGPT are productivity, efficiency, and ethics. Early adopters' attitudes towards ChatGPT are multifaceted. On one hand, some users view it as a transformative tool capable of amplifying student self-efficacy and learning motivation. On the other hand, there is a degree of apprehension among concerned users. They worry about a potential overdependence on the AI system, which they fear might encourage superficial learning habits and erode students’ social and critical thinking skills. This dichotomy of opinions underscores the complexity of Human-AI Interaction in educational contexts. Our investigation adds depth to this ongoing discourse, providing crowd-sourced insights for educators and learners who are considering incorporating ChatGPT or similar generative AI tools into their pedagogical strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育中的聊天:是福还是祸?一项探讨早期采用者利用和认知的定性研究
为了促进教学有效和道德健全的人工智能集成学习景观的发展,批判性地探索沉浸在这些背景下的用户的感知和体验至关重要。在这项研究中,我们对四个主要的社交媒体平台进行了全面的定性内容分析。我们的目标是了解用户体验(UX)和不同教育部门ChatGPT早期采用者的观点。我们的研究结果表明,ChatGPT最常用于高等教育、K-12教育和实践技能培训领域。在社交媒体对话中,最常与ChatGPT相关的话题是生产力、效率和道德。早期采用者对ChatGPT的态度是多方面的。一方面,一些用户将其视为一种能够增强学生自我效能感和学习动机的变革性工具。另一方面,有关用户有一定程度的忧虑。他们担心对人工智能系统的潜在过度依赖,他们担心这可能会鼓励肤浅的学习习惯,侵蚀学生的社交和批判性思维技能。这种观点的二分法强调了教育环境中人类与人工智能交互的复杂性。我们的调查为这一正在进行的讨论增加了深度,为正在考虑将ChatGPT或类似的生成人工智能工具纳入其教学策略的教育工作者和学习者提供了众包见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can ChatGPT read who you are? Understanding young adults’ attitudes towards using AI chatbots for psychotherapy: The role of self-stigma Aversion against machines with complex mental abilities: The role of individual differences Differences between human and artificial/augmented intelligence in medicine Integrating sound effects and background music in Robotic storytelling – A series of online studies across different story genres
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1