Stigma perception and determinants among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iraq.

Taqi M J Taher, Hussein A Ahmed, Ali A Abutiheen, Shaymaa A Alfadhul, Hasanain F Ghazi
{"title":"Stigma perception and determinants among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iraq.","authors":"Taqi M J Taher, Hussein A Ahmed, Ali A Abutiheen, Shaymaa A Alfadhul, Hasanain F Ghazi","doi":"10.1186/s42506-023-00145-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Stigma is a sign of social disgrace occurring within public relations, and it is linked with many health conditions including diabetes. Stigma could worsen the disease course, reduce treatment adherence, and affect the quality of life of diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of diabetic stigma among patients with type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this analytic cross-sectional study, data collection was performed from June 1, 2022, until November 1, 2022, et al.-Najaf City, Iraq. A consecutive sample of 429 patients with type 2 DM was interviewed using the Arabic version of the type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2), which is a validated tool. The total diabetic stigma score, treated differently score, self-stigma score, and blame and judgment score were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the sample was 56.6 years, and males represented 61.8% of them. The total diabetic stigma score mean was 51.72. The question regarding people's judgment of food choices showed the highest rate (53%) among patients. Problematic stigma appeared in 24.71% of DM patients. Lower educational level, being divorced or widow, age above 50 years, being unemployed or housewife, and lower income showed significantly higher diabetic stigma scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-quarter of type 2 DM patients showed problematic stigma. The mean diabetic stigma score was significantly higher among patients with lower education, divorced or widow status, older age, unemployment or housewife category, and low-income status.</p>","PeriodicalId":22819,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","volume":"98 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42506-023-00145-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of death worldwide. Stigma is a sign of social disgrace occurring within public relations, and it is linked with many health conditions including diabetes. Stigma could worsen the disease course, reduce treatment adherence, and affect the quality of life of diabetic patients. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of diabetic stigma among patients with type 2 DM.

Methods: In this analytic cross-sectional study, data collection was performed from June 1, 2022, until November 1, 2022, et al.-Najaf City, Iraq. A consecutive sample of 429 patients with type 2 DM was interviewed using the Arabic version of the type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2), which is a validated tool. The total diabetic stigma score, treated differently score, self-stigma score, and blame and judgment score were estimated.

Results: The mean age of the sample was 56.6 years, and males represented 61.8% of them. The total diabetic stigma score mean was 51.72. The question regarding people's judgment of food choices showed the highest rate (53%) among patients. Problematic stigma appeared in 24.71% of DM patients. Lower educational level, being divorced or widow, age above 50 years, being unemployed or housewife, and lower income showed significantly higher diabetic stigma scores.

Conclusion: One-quarter of type 2 DM patients showed problematic stigma. The mean diabetic stigma score was significantly higher among patients with lower education, divorced or widow status, older age, unemployment or housewife category, and low-income status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊拉克2型糖尿病患者的病耻感及其影响因素
背景与目的:糖尿病(DM)是世界范围内死亡的主要原因。耻辱是在公共关系中发生的社会耻辱的标志,它与包括糖尿病在内的许多健康状况有关。耻辱感会加重病程,降低治疗依从性,影响糖尿病患者的生活质量。本研究的目的是评估2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病耻辱感程度。方法:在这项分析性横断面研究中,从2022年6月1日至2022年11月1日等进行数据收集。使用阿拉伯版2型糖尿病病耻感评估量表(DSAS-2)对429例2型糖尿病患者进行了连续抽样访谈,该量表是一种经过验证的工具。评估糖尿病患者总病耻感评分、治疗差异评分、自我病耻感评分、责备和判断评分。结果:样本平均年龄为56.6岁,男性占61.8%。糖尿病病耻感总分平均值为51.72。关于人们对食物选择的判断的问题在患者中显示出最高的比率(53%)。24.71%的DM患者出现问题性耻感。受教育程度低、离异或丧偶、年龄在50岁以上、失业或家庭主妇、收入较低的人,其糖尿病污名得分显著较高。结论:1 / 4的2型糖尿病患者存在问题耻感。受教育程度较低、离异或丧偶、年龄较大、失业或家庭主妇、低收入者的糖尿病病耻感平均得分较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal accepts papers of original research which are not being considered for publication elsewhere and which contribute to the advancement of knowledge of Public Health at large
期刊最新文献
Metabolic syndrome prediction based on body composition indices. Pattern of antibiotic use among children caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Correction: Framework for developing cost-effectiveness analysis threshold: the case of Egypt. Psychological antecedents of vaccine inequity: keys to improve the rates of vaccination. Matters arising: On the cost-effectiveness for the Italian National Health Service of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1