Sensitivity of PCR in conjunctival swab samples for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 Veterinary Revista Brasileira De Parasitologia Veterinaria Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S1984-29612023063
Mariana Fagundes Bento, Gabriela Scarpin de Souza, Bruno Serpa Vieira, Ângela Adamski da Silva, Felipe da Silva Krawczak, Veridiana Maria Brianezi Dignani de Moura
{"title":"Sensitivity of PCR in conjunctival swab samples for the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mariana Fagundes Bento, Gabriela Scarpin de Souza, Bruno Serpa Vieira, Ângela Adamski da Silva, Felipe da Silva Krawczak, Veridiana Maria Brianezi Dignani de Moura","doi":"10.1590/S1984-29612023063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare the sensitivity of conjunctival swab (CS) and conventional samples (blood, spleen, liver, lymphoid and cutaneous tissue) in the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, VHL/BVS (Virtual Health Library), CAPES, and Scielo databases. Articles published from 2002 to 2022 were considered and the review was updated in Jul 2023. From the total of 371 identified studies, 8 met all the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Data from 658 CVL-positive dogs and 2541 PCR results were considered. Using a random effect model, data on the sensitivity of the test was compared between intervention (CS samples) and comparison (all the other samples) groups. Overall, the use of CS in the PCR diagnosis of CVL produced 12% higher sensitivity (p=0.013) in the test than all the other samples in combination. The animals' clinical condition did not influence (p>0.142) this overall result. However, when CS was individually compared to each of the conventional samples, the consistent result was observed (p=0.012) only in the CS versus bone marrow comparison. Given their rapid acquisition, minimal invasiveness, and lower cost relative to conventional samples, CS samples present a promising alternative for the molecular diagnosis of CVL.</p>","PeriodicalId":48990,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Parasitologia Veterinaria","volume":"32 4","pages":"e009423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Parasitologia Veterinaria","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612023063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Veterinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To compare the sensitivity of conjunctival swab (CS) and conventional samples (blood, spleen, liver, lymphoid and cutaneous tissue) in the diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out using PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, VHL/BVS (Virtual Health Library), CAPES, and Scielo databases. Articles published from 2002 to 2022 were considered and the review was updated in Jul 2023. From the total of 371 identified studies, 8 met all the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Data from 658 CVL-positive dogs and 2541 PCR results were considered. Using a random effect model, data on the sensitivity of the test was compared between intervention (CS samples) and comparison (all the other samples) groups. Overall, the use of CS in the PCR diagnosis of CVL produced 12% higher sensitivity (p=0.013) in the test than all the other samples in combination. The animals' clinical condition did not influence (p>0.142) this overall result. However, when CS was individually compared to each of the conventional samples, the consistent result was observed (p=0.012) only in the CS versus bone marrow comparison. Given their rapid acquisition, minimal invasiveness, and lower cost relative to conventional samples, CS samples present a promising alternative for the molecular diagnosis of CVL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PCR在结膜拭子样本诊断犬内脏利什曼病的敏感性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
采用PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus、Web of Science、VHL/BVS (Virtual Health Library)、CAPES和Scielo数据库对结膜拭子(CS)和常规样本(血液、脾脏、肝脏、淋巴组织和皮肤组织)在犬内脏利什曼病(CVL)诊断中的敏感性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。考虑了2002年至2022年发表的文章,并于2023年7月进行了更新。在371项纳入的研究中,有8项符合所有入选标准,被纳入本综述。分析了658只cvel阳性犬的数据和2541只PCR结果。采用随机效应模型,比较干预组(CS样本)和对照组(所有其他样本)之间测试灵敏度的数据。总体而言,CS在CVL PCR诊断中的使用比所有其他样品的组合在测试中产生了12%的高灵敏度(p=0.013)。动物的临床状况对总体结果没有影响(p>0.142)。然而,当CS单独与每个常规样本进行比较时,仅在CS与骨髓比较中观察到一致的结果(p=0.012)。与传统样品相比,CS样品采集速度快,侵入性小,成本低,因此CS样品是CVL分子诊断的一个有希望的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira De Parasitologia Veterinaria
Revista Brasileira De Parasitologia Veterinaria PARASITOLOGY-VETERINARY SCIENCES
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revista es un órgano de difusión del Colegio Brasileño de Parasitología Veterinaria, con una especificidad dentro de esa área, la difusión de los resultados de la investigación brasileña en las áreas de Helmintología, Protozoología, Entomología y agentes transmitidos por artrópodos, relacionados con la salud animal.
期刊最新文献
Anti-Pterobothrium heteracanthum (Trypanorhyncha: Pterobothriidae) IgG in human serum samples. Detection and quantification of Dioctophyme renale eggs in dog urine after nephrectomy. First record of Haematopinus tuberculatus (Burmeister, 1839) (Psocodea: Anoplura: Haematopinidae) parasitizing buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) in the state of Amazonas, Brazil. Gastrointestinal Platyhelminths of Free-Living Cuniculus paca (Linnaeus, 1766) in the Western Amazon. Optimization and workflow of in vitro culture of adult Fasciola hepatica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1