Physician-hospital alignment: A definition and framework grounded in physicians' perception.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000388
Chad T Brinsfield, Richard J Priore, Nizar K Wehbi
{"title":"Physician-hospital alignment: A definition and framework grounded in physicians' perception.","authors":"Chad T Brinsfield, Richard J Priore, Nizar K Wehbi","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The alignment of physicians' interests with those of their hospital has garnered considerable interest in recent years, in part because of their central role in health care expenditure and patient outcomes. However, the systematic study of physician-hospital alignment is currently impeded by a lack of construct clarity. This is evidenced by research that conflates the actions intended to create alignment with alignment itself. It is also evidenced by a variety of different definitions, conceptualizations, and measures in the literature, most of which are confounded with constructs that are something other than alignment (e.g., commitment, trust).</p><p><strong>Critical theoretical analysis: </strong>We draw on agency theory and person-organization fit to define physician-hospital alignment as a physician's perception that their financial incentives, goals, and values and those of their hospital are mutually supporting and reinforcing rather than in conflict with one another.</p><p><strong>Advance: </strong>To better understand the nature of the construct and to help guide future research, we present an integrative framework grounded in physicians' perceptions.</p><p><strong>Practice implication: </strong>Our definition and framework set the stage for improved construct validation and more systematic study and management of physician-hospital alignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"74-84"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The alignment of physicians' interests with those of their hospital has garnered considerable interest in recent years, in part because of their central role in health care expenditure and patient outcomes. However, the systematic study of physician-hospital alignment is currently impeded by a lack of construct clarity. This is evidenced by research that conflates the actions intended to create alignment with alignment itself. It is also evidenced by a variety of different definitions, conceptualizations, and measures in the literature, most of which are confounded with constructs that are something other than alignment (e.g., commitment, trust).

Critical theoretical analysis: We draw on agency theory and person-organization fit to define physician-hospital alignment as a physician's perception that their financial incentives, goals, and values and those of their hospital are mutually supporting and reinforcing rather than in conflict with one another.

Advance: To better understand the nature of the construct and to help guide future research, we present an integrative framework grounded in physicians' perceptions.

Practice implication: Our definition and framework set the stage for improved construct validation and more systematic study and management of physician-hospital alignment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生与医院的一致性:一个基于医生感知的定义和框架。
近年来,医生的利益与医院的利益相结合已经引起了相当大的关注,部分原因是他们在医疗保健支出和患者预后方面发挥着核心作用。然而,系统的研究医师-医院对齐目前是阻碍缺乏清晰的结构。研究证明了这一点,该研究将旨在创造一致性的行动与一致性本身混为一谈。文献中的各种不同的定义、概念化和度量方法也证明了这一点,其中大多数都与除了一致性之外的其他结构相混淆(例如,承诺、信任)。批判性理论分析:我们利用代理理论和个人-组织契合度来定义医生-医院一致性,即医生认为他们的财务激励、目标和价值观与医院的财务激励、目标和价值观是相互支持和加强的,而不是相互冲突的。进展:为了更好地理解结构的本质并帮助指导未来的研究,我们提出了一个基于医生感知的综合框架。实践启示:我们的定义和框架为改进结构验证和更系统地研究和管理医院对齐奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
期刊最新文献
Improving joy at work and reducing burnout in health care workers in Victoria, Australia using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement joy in work framework: A mixed-methods study. What makes proactive behaviors at work effective? Perspectives of health care executives. Stanford Network for Advancement and Promotion: The impact of a community building-focused leadership development program on the success of underrepresented groups in academic medicine. Exploring barriers to employee voice among certified nursing assistants: A qualitative study. Good therapeutic connections and patient psychological safety: A qualitative survey study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1