Mechanical Thrombectomy in Anticoagulated Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurologist Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000542
HaoLiang Zhang, Shiqin Chen, QianYuan Zhu, ZongShan Li, Tian Lv, Chengjiang Liu
{"title":"Mechanical Thrombectomy in Anticoagulated Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"HaoLiang Zhang, Shiqin Chen, QianYuan Zhu, ZongShan Li, Tian Lv, Chengjiang Liu","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>According to a previous studies, mechanical thrombectomy(MT) is safe for anticoagulated patients. However, the safety and prognosis of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have not been compared with those of MT.This meta-analysis aimed at determining the efficacy of DOACs or VKA for patients after MT.</p><p><strong>Review summary: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases, and Cochrane from their inception to Aug 2022. Revman 5.3 served for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 12 studies that covered 3571 patients, finding that after MT treatment, DOACs significantly decreased the symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage [odd ratio (OR)=0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80, P =0.004] and mortality (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.83, P =0.001) compared with VKA. Meanwhile, no obvious differences were found between DOACs and VKA after MT treatment in terms of in any hemorrhagic transformation (OR=1.07, 95% CI 0.84-1.37, P =0.59), good functional outcome (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.27, P =0.53), and successful arterial recanalization (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.53, P =0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that the application of DOACs in MT treatment for anticoagulated patients with acute ischemic stroke is safer than that in the VKA group. However, further studies are necessary to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":"194-203"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000542","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: According to a previous studies, mechanical thrombectomy(MT) is safe for anticoagulated patients. However, the safety and prognosis of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have not been compared with those of MT.This meta-analysis aimed at determining the efficacy of DOACs or VKA for patients after MT.

Review summary: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science databases, and Cochrane from their inception to Aug 2022. Revman 5.3 served for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 12 studies that covered 3571 patients, finding that after MT treatment, DOACs significantly decreased the symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage [odd ratio (OR)=0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80, P =0.004] and mortality (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.83, P =0.001) compared with VKA. Meanwhile, no obvious differences were found between DOACs and VKA after MT treatment in terms of in any hemorrhagic transformation (OR=1.07, 95% CI 0.84-1.37, P =0.59), good functional outcome (OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.27, P =0.53), and successful arterial recanalization (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.53, P =0.05).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the application of DOACs in MT treatment for anticoagulated patients with acute ischemic stroke is safer than that in the VKA group. However, further studies are necessary to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性缺血性脑卒中抗凝患者机械取栓:荟萃分析
背景:根据以往的研究,机械取栓(MT)对抗凝患者是安全的。然而,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)和维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)的安全性和预后尚未与mt进行比较。这项荟萃分析旨在确定DOACs或VKA对mt后患者的疗效。综述摘要:我们检索了PubMed, Embase, Web of Science数据库和Cochrane,从他们成立到2022年8月。meta分析采用Revman 5.3。meta分析纳入12项研究,涵盖3571例患者,发现与VKA相比,MT治疗后DOACs显著降低症状性脑出血[奇比(OR)=0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.80, P=0.004]和死亡率(OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.48-0.83, P=0.001)。同时,在MT治疗后,DOACs与VKA在任何出血转化(OR=1.07, 95% CI 0.84-1.37, P=0.59)、良好的功能结局(OR=1.06, 95% CI 0.88-1.27, P=0.53)、动脉再通成功(OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.00-1.53, P=0.05)方面均无明显差异。结论:本荟萃分析表明,DOACs在抗凝急性缺血性脑卒中患者MT治疗中的应用比VKA组更安全。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and Antithrombotic Regimens in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Competing Large-Artery Atherosclerosis. The Efficacy for Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Between Neuroendoscopic Surgery and Conservative Treatment: A Retrospective Observational Study. Enoxaparin Failure in Patient With Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis and Prothrombin G20210A Mutation: Case Report. Clinical Observation of Infarct Volume ≥150 mL in Endovascular Thrombectomy Treatment. Risk Factors of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Mortality Among Adults With Endocardial Fibroelastosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1