An Exploration of Methods to Resolve Inconsistent Self-Reporting of Chronic Conditions and Impact on Multimorbidity in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging and Health Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1177/08982643231215476
Alessandra T Andreacchi, Alberto Brini, Edwin Van den Heuvel, Graciela Muniz-Terrera, Alexandra Mayhew, Philip St John, Lucy E Stirland, Lauren E Griffith
{"title":"An Exploration of Methods to Resolve Inconsistent Self-Reporting of Chronic Conditions and Impact on Multimorbidity in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.","authors":"Alessandra T Andreacchi, Alberto Brini, Edwin Van den Heuvel, Graciela Muniz-Terrera, Alexandra Mayhew, Philip St John, Lucy E Stirland, Lauren E Griffith","doi":"10.1177/08982643231215476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify inconsistent self-reporting of chronic conditions between the baseline (2011-2015) and first follow-up surveys (2015-2018) in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), and to explore methods to resolve inconsistent responses and impact on multimorbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Community-dwelling adults aged 45-85 years in the baseline and first follow-up surveys were included (<i>n</i> = 45,184). At each survey, participants self-reported whether they ever had a physician diagnosis of 35 chronic conditions. Identifiable inconsistent responses were enumerated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32-40% of participants had at least one inconsistent response across all conditions. Illness-related information (e.g., taking medication) resolved most inconsistent responses (>93%) while computer-assisted software asking participants to confirm their inconsistent disease status resolved ≤53%. Using these adjudication methods, multimorbidity prevalence at follow-up increased by ≤1.6% compared to the prevalence without resolving inconsistent responses.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Inconsistent self-reporting of chronic conditions is common but may not substantially affect multimorbidity prevalence. Future research should validate methods to resolve inconsistencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"40-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643231215476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To quantify inconsistent self-reporting of chronic conditions between the baseline (2011-2015) and first follow-up surveys (2015-2018) in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA), and to explore methods to resolve inconsistent responses and impact on multimorbidity.

Methods: Community-dwelling adults aged 45-85 years in the baseline and first follow-up surveys were included (n = 45,184). At each survey, participants self-reported whether they ever had a physician diagnosis of 35 chronic conditions. Identifiable inconsistent responses were enumerated.

Results: 32-40% of participants had at least one inconsistent response across all conditions. Illness-related information (e.g., taking medication) resolved most inconsistent responses (>93%) while computer-assisted software asking participants to confirm their inconsistent disease status resolved ≤53%. Using these adjudication methods, multimorbidity prevalence at follow-up increased by ≤1.6% compared to the prevalence without resolving inconsistent responses.

Discussion: Inconsistent self-reporting of chronic conditions is common but may not substantially affect multimorbidity prevalence. Future research should validate methods to resolve inconsistencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大老龄化纵向研究中解决慢性病自我报告不一致及其对多重发病率影响的方法探索。
目的:量化加拿大纵向老龄化研究(CLSA)基线(2011-2015)与首次随访调查(2015-2018)之间慢性疾病自我报告的不一致,并探讨解决不一致反应及其对多病的影响的方法。方法:纳入基线调查和首次随访调查中45-85岁的社区居住成年人(n = 45184)。在每次调查中,参与者自我报告他们是否有35种慢性疾病的医生诊断。列举了可识别的不一致响应。结果:32-40%的参与者在所有条件下至少有一个不一致的反应。疾病相关信息(如服药)解决了大多数不一致的回答(>93%),而计算机辅助软件要求参与者确认其不一致的疾病状态解决了≤53%。使用这些判定方法,与未解决不一致反应的患病率相比,随访时多病患病率增加≤1.6%。讨论:慢性病不一致的自我报告是常见的,但可能不会实质性地影响多病患病率。未来的研究应该验证解决不一致的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood Built Environments and Health in Later Life: A Literature Review. Age Changes in Religious Service Attendance in Mexican American Older Adults: A Growth Curve Analysis. Coping with Discrimination: A Longitudinal Study of Health Outcomes in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual and Heterosexual Midlife and Older Adults. An Exploration of Methods to Resolve Inconsistent Self-Reporting of Chronic Conditions and Impact on Multimorbidity in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Exploring the Characteristics of Men Aged 55+ Who Use Mental Health Community Care and Support Services: A Secondary Analysis of the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Study in England.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1