An Ethics of Justice in Elderly Care: Ageism and the Covid-19 Pandemic.

Christopher Ryan Maboloc, Anesito Cutillas
{"title":"An Ethics of Justice in Elderly Care: Ageism and the Covid-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Christopher Ryan Maboloc, Anesito Cutillas","doi":"10.1177/2752535X231219017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study looks into the condition of elderly Covid-19 patients regarding the kind of attention they received during the pandemic given the scarcity of medical resouces in the countries mentioned in this investigation. In this case, we apply the bioethical principle of justice on the age-based criteria in determining which patient must receive treatment The argument is that the same is a form of discimination against the elderly.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to emphasize that the age-based criteria in deciding whether to treat elderly Covid-19 patients or not is violative of the bioethical principle of justice since it discriminates against them.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study uses the interpretive method. The authors analyzed the literature and the arguments pertaining to the issue of ageism at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic. We mentioned the countries where the issue of prioritization was a big concern. The qualitative analysis in this paper is meant to respond to such medical dilemma.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>In our analysis, we determined that when age is used as a criterion, it violates the bioethical principle of justice. The principle is meant to ensure that physicians are fair in dealing with patients. Using age in deciding whether a life is worth saving or not is a prejudice against old people who require care and attention.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Medical doctors must treat patients equally and without bias. The challenge, however, is that due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, a triage is put in place to be able to manage the overwhelming influx of Covid-19 patients. Some age-based medical treatment criteria that recommend age-based cutoffs for specific treatments are morally untenable. This is because the same is bereft of any acceptable justification that warrants the judgment that the elderly must have less priority when medical resources are scarce.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, doctors must not discriminate patients on the basis of age. All lives are equal in moral worth. We argue that governments must promulgate non-discriminatory policies when it comes to medical treatment during a global public health emergency.</p>","PeriodicalId":72648,"journal":{"name":"Community health equity research & policy","volume":" ","pages":"2752535X231219017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community health equity research & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2752535X231219017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study looks into the condition of elderly Covid-19 patients regarding the kind of attention they received during the pandemic given the scarcity of medical resouces in the countries mentioned in this investigation. In this case, we apply the bioethical principle of justice on the age-based criteria in determining which patient must receive treatment The argument is that the same is a form of discimination against the elderly.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to emphasize that the age-based criteria in deciding whether to treat elderly Covid-19 patients or not is violative of the bioethical principle of justice since it discriminates against them.

Method: This study uses the interpretive method. The authors analyzed the literature and the arguments pertaining to the issue of ageism at the height of the Covid-19 Pandemic. We mentioned the countries where the issue of prioritization was a big concern. The qualitative analysis in this paper is meant to respond to such medical dilemma.

Analysis: In our analysis, we determined that when age is used as a criterion, it violates the bioethical principle of justice. The principle is meant to ensure that physicians are fair in dealing with patients. Using age in deciding whether a life is worth saving or not is a prejudice against old people who require care and attention.

Discussion: Medical doctors must treat patients equally and without bias. The challenge, however, is that due to the unprecedented nature of the pandemic, a triage is put in place to be able to manage the overwhelming influx of Covid-19 patients. Some age-based medical treatment criteria that recommend age-based cutoffs for specific treatments are morally untenable. This is because the same is bereft of any acceptable justification that warrants the judgment that the elderly must have less priority when medical resources are scarce.

Conclusion: In conclusion, doctors must not discriminate patients on the basis of age. All lives are equal in moral worth. We argue that governments must promulgate non-discriminatory policies when it comes to medical treatment during a global public health emergency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年护理中的正义伦理:老年歧视与新冠肺炎大流行。
背景:该研究着眼于老年Covid-19患者的状况,考虑到本调查中提到的国家缺乏医疗资源,他们在大流行期间受到的关注。在这种情况下,我们将生物伦理学的正义原则应用于以年龄为基础的标准,以确定哪些病人必须接受治疗。目的:本研究的目的是强调在决定是否治疗老年Covid-19患者时,基于年龄的标准违反了生物伦理学的正义原则,因为这是对老年人的歧视。方法:本研究采用解释法。作者分析了在Covid-19大流行高峰期与年龄歧视问题有关的文献和论点。我们提到了优先次序问题备受关注的国家。本文的定性分析就是为了回应这一医学困境。分析:在我们的分析中,我们确定当年龄作为一个标准时,它违反了生物伦理的正义原则。这一原则是为了确保医生对待病人是公平的。用年龄来决定一个生命是否值得拯救是对需要照顾和关注的老年人的一种偏见。讨论:医生必须平等对待病人,不带偏见。然而,挑战在于,由于大流行的空前性质,需要进行分类,以便能够管理大量涌入的Covid-19患者。一些以年龄为基础的医疗标准,推荐以年龄为基础的特定治疗截止点,在道德上是站不住脚的。这是因为,在医疗资源匮乏的情况下,没有任何可接受的理由可以证明老年人的优先地位一定较低。结论:综上所述,医生不应因年龄而歧视患者。所有生命的道德价值都是平等的。我们认为,在全球突发公共卫生事件期间,各国政府必须颁布非歧视性的医疗政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Engagement in the BE SAGE Project: Reducing COVID-19 in Hispanic and Low-Income Preschoolers via Testing and Open-Air Garden-Based Education. "How Fluent Do I Need to Be to Say I'm Fluent?" Research Experiences of Communities that Speak Languages Other than English. The Equity Impact of Universal Home Visits to Pregnant Women and Their Spouses in Bauchi State, Nigeria: Secondary Analysis From a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial. "How to Make it Out Alive": A Strengths-Based Analysis of Latinas' Adolescent Sexual Health Experiences. Centering Communities in Global Health: Using Human-Centered Design to Facilitate Collaboration and Intervention Development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1