An update on technical and safety practice patterns of interlaminar epidural steroid injections

Berkenesh Gebrekristos , Razvan Turcu , Dana Kotler , Ashley E. Gureck , Alec L. Meleger
{"title":"An update on technical and safety practice patterns of interlaminar epidural steroid injections","authors":"Berkenesh Gebrekristos ,&nbsp;Razvan Turcu ,&nbsp;Dana Kotler ,&nbsp;Ashley E. Gureck ,&nbsp;Alec L. Meleger","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs) are mainstay in the management of low back, neck and radicular pain and are a commonly performed pain management procedure in the United States. Our survey aims to provide an update in practice patterns of ILESIs among interventional pain physicians.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We distributed a 91-item survey nationwide to private and academic interventional pain physicians who perform epidural steroid injections (ESIs). The survey was distributed via REDCap with a series of questions inquiring about current practices in epidural steroid injections from March 2021 to March 2022. Cross sectional data from survey responses specific to ILESI-related practices were captured and synthesized.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 103 complete survey responses, 96 physicians perform ILESIs (cervical, 87.5 %; thoracic, 82.3 %; lumbar 99 %). Nearly all surveyed physicians utilize fluoroscopy (98.1 %) over other modalities like MRI and ultrasound. For CIESIs, dexamethasone was the preferred steroid (52.4 %) over methylprednisolone (23.7 %); the converse was true for LIESIs in which methylprednisolone (44.2 %) was preferred over dexamethasone (32.6 %). The majority of providers performing ILESI's (91.7 %) preferred a Tuohy/Weiss needle while only a small fraction preferred the Quincke needle (7.2 %). Sedation practices were more varied with only about half of providers (47.6 %) offering medications. Furthermore, a great fraction of providers continue to use contrast for LIESIs (97.9 %) and CIESIs (89.6 %).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our survey suggests that despite updated consensus recommendations, variability continues to exist in procedural practice patterns. Highlighting areas of variable adherence to current safety guidelines can assist with what is emphasized in the generation of future evidence-based guidelines. Though our survey was conducted in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic with resultant supply chain shortages, more research is needed to elucidate what variables may factor into why proceduralists may stray from guideline concordant care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423002030/pdfft?md5=1b5cc1aa8c0905a066880be1d6813f69&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594423002030-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594423002030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs) are mainstay in the management of low back, neck and radicular pain and are a commonly performed pain management procedure in the United States. Our survey aims to provide an update in practice patterns of ILESIs among interventional pain physicians.

Methods

We distributed a 91-item survey nationwide to private and academic interventional pain physicians who perform epidural steroid injections (ESIs). The survey was distributed via REDCap with a series of questions inquiring about current practices in epidural steroid injections from March 2021 to March 2022. Cross sectional data from survey responses specific to ILESI-related practices were captured and synthesized.

Results

Of 103 complete survey responses, 96 physicians perform ILESIs (cervical, 87.5 %; thoracic, 82.3 %; lumbar 99 %). Nearly all surveyed physicians utilize fluoroscopy (98.1 %) over other modalities like MRI and ultrasound. For CIESIs, dexamethasone was the preferred steroid (52.4 %) over methylprednisolone (23.7 %); the converse was true for LIESIs in which methylprednisolone (44.2 %) was preferred over dexamethasone (32.6 %). The majority of providers performing ILESI's (91.7 %) preferred a Tuohy/Weiss needle while only a small fraction preferred the Quincke needle (7.2 %). Sedation practices were more varied with only about half of providers (47.6 %) offering medications. Furthermore, a great fraction of providers continue to use contrast for LIESIs (97.9 %) and CIESIs (89.6 %).

Discussion

Our survey suggests that despite updated consensus recommendations, variability continues to exist in procedural practice patterns. Highlighting areas of variable adherence to current safety guidelines can assist with what is emphasized in the generation of future evidence-based guidelines. Though our survey was conducted in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic with resultant supply chain shortages, more research is needed to elucidate what variables may factor into why proceduralists may stray from guideline concordant care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膜间硬膜外类固醇注射技术和安全实践模式的最新进展
膜间硬膜外类固醇注射(ILESIs)是治疗下背部、颈部和神经根性疼痛的主要方法,在美国是一种常用的疼痛治疗方法。我们的调查旨在为介入性疼痛医生提供ilis的最新实践模式。方法我们在全国范围内对进行硬膜外类固醇注射(ESIs)的私人和学术介入疼痛医生进行了91项调查。该调查通过REDCap进行分发,其中包含一系列问题,询问2021年3月至2022年3月硬膜外类固醇注射的当前做法。收集并综合了针对ilesi相关实践的调查反馈的横截面数据。结果在103份完整的调查问卷中,96名医生进行了肠内导肠术(宫颈,87.5%;胸部,82.3%;腰椎99%)。几乎所有接受调查的医生(98.1%)都使用透视检查,而不是MRI和超声等其他方式。对于ciis,地塞米松是首选类固醇(52.4%),而甲基强的松龙(23.7%);相反的是,在liis中,甲基强的松龙(44.2%)优于地塞米松(32.6%)。执行ILESI的大多数提供者(91.7%)首选Tuohy/Weiss针,而只有一小部分首选Quincke针(7.2%)。镇静做法更加多样化,只有大约一半的提供者(47.6%)提供药物。此外,很大一部分的提供者继续对liis(97.9%)和ciis(89.6%)使用对比。讨论我们的调查表明,尽管更新了共识建议,但在程序实践模式中仍然存在可变性。强调对当前安全指南的不同遵守可以帮助在未来的循证指南的制定中强调。尽管我们的调查是在COVID-19大流行导致供应链短缺的背景下进行的,但需要更多的研究来阐明哪些变量可能影响程序主义者偏离指南一致性护理的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reddit users' perspectives on radiofrequency ablation: A data analysis. Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1