Gaps in pediatric emergency medicine education of emergency medicine residents: A needs assessment of recent graduates

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10918
Kyle Schoppel MD, Jordan Spector MD, Ijeoma Okafor MPH, Richard Church MD, Katy Deblois DO, David Della-Giustina MD, Adam Kellogg MD, Casey MacVane MD, PMH, Matthew Pirotte MD, David Snow MD, Geoffrey Hays MD, Amy Mariorenzi MD, Haley Connelly, Alexander Sheng MD
{"title":"Gaps in pediatric emergency medicine education of emergency medicine residents: A needs assessment of recent graduates","authors":"Kyle Schoppel MD,&nbsp;Jordan Spector MD,&nbsp;Ijeoma Okafor MPH,&nbsp;Richard Church MD,&nbsp;Katy Deblois DO,&nbsp;David Della-Giustina MD,&nbsp;Adam Kellogg MD,&nbsp;Casey MacVane MD, PMH,&nbsp;Matthew Pirotte MD,&nbsp;David Snow MD,&nbsp;Geoffrey Hays MD,&nbsp;Amy Mariorenzi MD,&nbsp;Haley Connelly,&nbsp;Alexander Sheng MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>More than 90% of pediatric patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States are evaluated and treated in community-based EDs. Recent evidence suggests that mortality outcomes may be worse for critically ill pediatric patients treated at community EDs. The disparate mortality outcomes may be due to inconsistency in pediatric-specific education provided to emergency medicine (EM) trainees during residency training. There are few studies surveying recently graduated EM physicians assessing perceived gaps in the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) education they received during residency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective, survey-based, descriptive cohort study of EM residency graduates from 10 institutions across the United States who were &lt;5 years out from residency training. Deidentified surveys were distributed via email.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 222 responses were obtained from 570 eligible participants (39.1%). Non-ED pediatric rotations during residency training included pediatric intensive care (60%), pediatric anesthesia (32.4%), neonatal intensive care unit (26.1%), and pediatric wards (17.1%). A large percentage (42.8%) of respondents felt uncomfortable managing neonates and performing tube thoracostomy on pediatric patients (56.3%). The EM graduate's satisfaction with pediatric simulation–based training during residency was positively associated with comfort caring for neonates and infants (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0070 and <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0002) and performing endotracheal intubation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0027), lumbar puncture (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0004), and Pediatric Advanced Life Support resuscitation (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions/discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This survey-based cohort study found considerable variation in pediatric-specific experiences during EM residency training and in perceived comfort managing pediatric patients. In general, participants were more comfortable managing older children. This study suggests that the greatest perceived knowledge gaps in PEM were neonatal medicine/resuscitation and pediatric cardiac arrest. Future research will continue to address larger cohorts, representative of the PEM education provided to EM physicians in the United States to promote future educational initiatives.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

More than 90% of pediatric patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States are evaluated and treated in community-based EDs. Recent evidence suggests that mortality outcomes may be worse for critically ill pediatric patients treated at community EDs. The disparate mortality outcomes may be due to inconsistency in pediatric-specific education provided to emergency medicine (EM) trainees during residency training. There are few studies surveying recently graduated EM physicians assessing perceived gaps in the pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) education they received during residency.

Methods

This was a prospective, survey-based, descriptive cohort study of EM residency graduates from 10 institutions across the United States who were <5 years out from residency training. Deidentified surveys were distributed via email.

Results

A total of 222 responses were obtained from 570 eligible participants (39.1%). Non-ED pediatric rotations during residency training included pediatric intensive care (60%), pediatric anesthesia (32.4%), neonatal intensive care unit (26.1%), and pediatric wards (17.1%). A large percentage (42.8%) of respondents felt uncomfortable managing neonates and performing tube thoracostomy on pediatric patients (56.3%). The EM graduate's satisfaction with pediatric simulation–based training during residency was positively associated with comfort caring for neonates and infants (p < 0.0070 and p < 0.0002) and performing endotracheal intubation (p < 0.0027), lumbar puncture (p < 0.0004), and Pediatric Advanced Life Support resuscitation (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions/discussion

This survey-based cohort study found considerable variation in pediatric-specific experiences during EM residency training and in perceived comfort managing pediatric patients. In general, participants were more comfortable managing older children. This study suggests that the greatest perceived knowledge gaps in PEM were neonatal medicine/resuscitation and pediatric cardiac arrest. Future research will continue to address larger cohorts, representative of the PEM education provided to EM physicians in the United States to promote future educational initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科住院医师儿科急诊科教育的差距:近期毕业生需求评估
背景:在美国,超过90%的儿科急诊科患者在社区急诊科接受评估和治疗。最近的证据表明,在社区急诊科治疗的重症儿科患者的死亡率结果可能更糟。不同的死亡率结果可能是由于住院医师培训期间向急诊医学(EM)受训者提供的儿科特定教育不一致。很少有研究调查最近毕业的急诊医师,评估他们在住院期间接受的儿科急诊医学(PEM)教育的感知差距。方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、基于调查的描述性队列研究,研究对象是来自美国10个机构的EM住院医师毕业生,他们都是住院医师培训结束后的5年。未确定身份的调查通过电子邮件分发。结果570名符合条件的参与者共获得222份应答(39.1%)。住院医师培训期间的非急诊科儿科轮转包括儿科重症监护(60%)、儿科麻醉(32.4%)、新生儿重症监护(26.1%)和儿科病房(17.1%)。很大比例(42.8%)的受访者对管理新生儿和对儿科患者进行管式开胸术(56.3%)感到不舒服。EM毕业生在住院期间对儿科模拟培训的满意度与新生儿和婴儿的舒适护理(p < 0.0070和p < 0.0002)、气管插管(p < 0.0027)、腰椎穿刺(p < 0.0004)和儿科高级生命支持复苏(p < 0.0001)呈正相关。结论/讨论这项基于调查的队列研究发现,在EM住院医师培训期间的儿科特定经验和对儿科患者的感知舒适管理方面存在相当大的差异。总的来说,参与者更善于管理年龄较大的孩子。这项研究表明,PEM最大的认知知识差距是新生儿医学/复苏和儿科心脏骤停。未来的研究将继续针对更大的队列,为美国的急诊医生提供PEM教育,以促进未来的教育举措。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Evaluating ExpandED: Evaluating the effectiveness of a serious game expansion pack in teaching health professional students about interprofessional care Faculty consensus on competitiveness for the new competency-based emergency medicine standardized letter of evaluation Issue Information Development and implementation of just-in-time curricula for on-shift teaching during times of boarding Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating high-quality slides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1