Marwa R Elbarbary, Laila A Ahmed, Doaa A El-Adl, Alshimaa A Ezzat, Sherif A Nassib
{"title":"Study of Osteopontin as a Marker of Arteriovenous Shunt Stenosis in Hemodialysis Patients.","authors":"Marwa R Elbarbary, Laila A Ahmed, Doaa A El-Adl, Alshimaa A Ezzat, Sherif A Nassib","doi":"10.2174/0115701611260120231106081701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the recommended access for hemodialysis (HD), it carries a high risk for stenosis. Since osteopontin (OPN) is implicated in the process of vascular calcification in HD patients, OPN may be a marker for AVF stenosis. The present study evaluated OPN as a potential marker of AVF stenosis in HD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnosing a stenotic lesion was made by combining B mode with color and pulse wave Doppler imaging. Criteria for diagnosis of stenotic AVF included 50% reduction in diameter in B mode in combination with a 2-3-fold increase of peak systolic velocity compared with the unaffected segment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The present study included 60 HD patients with stenotic AVF and 60 patients with functional AVF. Comparison between the two groups revealed that patients in the former group had significantly higher serum OPN levels [median (IQR): 17.1 (12.1-30.4) vs 5.8 (5.0-10.0) ng/mL, p<0.001]. All patients were classified into those with low (< median) and with high (≥ median) OPN levels. Comparison between these groups revealed that the former group had a significantly lower frequency of stenotic AVF (31.7 vs 68.3%, p<0.001) and a longer time to AVF stenosis [mean (95% CI): 68.4 (54.7-82.1) vs 46.5 (39.6-53.4) months, p=0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OPN levels in HD patients may be useful markers for predicting and detecting AVF stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611260120231106081701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Although arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the recommended access for hemodialysis (HD), it carries a high risk for stenosis. Since osteopontin (OPN) is implicated in the process of vascular calcification in HD patients, OPN may be a marker for AVF stenosis. The present study evaluated OPN as a potential marker of AVF stenosis in HD patients.
Methods: Diagnosing a stenotic lesion was made by combining B mode with color and pulse wave Doppler imaging. Criteria for diagnosis of stenotic AVF included 50% reduction in diameter in B mode in combination with a 2-3-fold increase of peak systolic velocity compared with the unaffected segment.
Results: The present study included 60 HD patients with stenotic AVF and 60 patients with functional AVF. Comparison between the two groups revealed that patients in the former group had significantly higher serum OPN levels [median (IQR): 17.1 (12.1-30.4) vs 5.8 (5.0-10.0) ng/mL, p<0.001]. All patients were classified into those with low (< median) and with high (≥ median) OPN levels. Comparison between these groups revealed that the former group had a significantly lower frequency of stenotic AVF (31.7 vs 68.3%, p<0.001) and a longer time to AVF stenosis [mean (95% CI): 68.4 (54.7-82.1) vs 46.5 (39.6-53.4) months, p=0.001].
Conclusion: OPN levels in HD patients may be useful markers for predicting and detecting AVF stenosis.
期刊介绍:
Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research.
Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).