Performance of DNA methylation analysis in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN3+): a cross-sectional study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Infectious Agents and Cancer Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1186/s13027-023-00555-2
Yuxiang Liu, Yan Chen, Jing Xiong, Peng Zhu, Yuhang An, Shu Li, Puxiang Chen, Qing Li
{"title":"Performance of DNA methylation analysis in the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or worse (CIN3+): a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yuxiang Liu, Yan Chen, Jing Xiong, Peng Zhu, Yuhang An, Shu Li, Puxiang Chen, Qing Li","doi":"10.1186/s13027-023-00555-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is commonly accepted that host genes show high methylation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN3) or worse (CIN3+). However, study quality varies, as does the clinical performance of markers in different populations. We aimed to validate candidate gene DNA methylation with standardized testing methods in the same batch of samples. We first compared the performance of 16 DNA methylation markers for detecting CIN3+ in the 82-sample training set, including 24 subjects with ≤ CIN1, 10 subjects with CIN2, 23 subjects with CIN3, and 25 subjects with cervical cancer (CC). Then five methylation markers were selected and subsequently validated among an independent set of 74 subjects, including 47 subjects with ≤ CIN1, 13 subjects with CIN2, 6 subjects with CIN3, and 8 subjects with CC. The results in the validation set revealed that methylation analysis of the SOX1 (SOX1<sup>m</sup>) showed a superior level of clinical performance (AUC = 0.879; sensitivity = 85.7%; specificity = 90.0%). SOX1<sup>m</sup> had better accuracy than cytology, with a reduced referral rate (23.0% vs. 31.4%) and a lower number of overtreatment (5 vs. 13) cases among high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women. Importantly, among hrHPV-positive and SOX1<sup>m</sup>-negative women, only 1 CIN3 patient was at risk for follow-up after 1 year, whereas 1 CIN3 patient and 1 CC patient were at risk among hrHPV-positive and cytology-negative women. In this investigation, we screened 16 reported methylation markers to provide a basis for future studies related to potential precancerous lesion/cancer methylation markers in the Chinese population. The study also revealed that SOX1<sup>m</sup> has optimal CIN3+ detection performance, suggesting that it may be a promising biomarker for detecting CIN3+ in the Chinese population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13568,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Agents and Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Agents and Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13027-023-00555-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that host genes show high methylation in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 (CIN3) or worse (CIN3+). However, study quality varies, as does the clinical performance of markers in different populations. We aimed to validate candidate gene DNA methylation with standardized testing methods in the same batch of samples. We first compared the performance of 16 DNA methylation markers for detecting CIN3+ in the 82-sample training set, including 24 subjects with ≤ CIN1, 10 subjects with CIN2, 23 subjects with CIN3, and 25 subjects with cervical cancer (CC). Then five methylation markers were selected and subsequently validated among an independent set of 74 subjects, including 47 subjects with ≤ CIN1, 13 subjects with CIN2, 6 subjects with CIN3, and 8 subjects with CC. The results in the validation set revealed that methylation analysis of the SOX1 (SOX1m) showed a superior level of clinical performance (AUC = 0.879; sensitivity = 85.7%; specificity = 90.0%). SOX1m had better accuracy than cytology, with a reduced referral rate (23.0% vs. 31.4%) and a lower number of overtreatment (5 vs. 13) cases among high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women. Importantly, among hrHPV-positive and SOX1m-negative women, only 1 CIN3 patient was at risk for follow-up after 1 year, whereas 1 CIN3 patient and 1 CC patient were at risk among hrHPV-positive and cytology-negative women. In this investigation, we screened 16 reported methylation markers to provide a basis for future studies related to potential precancerous lesion/cancer methylation markers in the Chinese population. The study also revealed that SOX1m has optimal CIN3+ detection performance, suggesting that it may be a promising biomarker for detecting CIN3+ in the Chinese population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA甲基化分析在检测高级别宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN3+)中的表现:一项横断面研究。
人们普遍认为,宿主基因在宫颈上皮内瘤变3 (CIN3)或更严重(CIN3+)中表现出高甲基化。然而,研究质量各不相同,标志物在不同人群中的临床表现也是如此。我们的目的是用标准化的测试方法在同一批样品中验证候选基因DNA甲基化。我们首先比较了16种DNA甲基化标记物在82个样本训练集中检测CIN3+的性能,其中包括24例≤CIN1, 10例CIN2, 23例CIN3和25例宫颈癌(CC)患者。然后选择5个甲基化标记物,在74名独立受试者中进行验证,其中≤CIN1者47名,CIN2者13名,CIN3者6名,CC者8名。验证集结果显示,SOX1 (SOX1m)甲基化分析具有较好的临床表现(AUC = 0.879;灵敏度= 85.7%;特异性= 90.0%)。SOX1m的准确性优于细胞学,在高危人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)阳性妇女中转诊率较低(23.0%对31.4%),过度治疗病例数较低(5对13)。重要的是,在hrhpv阳性和sox1m阴性的女性中,随访1年后只有1例CIN3患者有风险,而在hrhpv阳性和细胞学阴性的女性中,有1例CIN3患者和1例CC患者有风险。在这项研究中,我们筛选了16个已报道的甲基化标记,为未来研究中国人群中潜在的癌前病变/癌症甲基化标记提供基础。该研究还发现,SOX1m具有最佳的CIN3+检测性能,这表明它可能是一种有希望检测中国人群中CIN3+的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Agents and Cancer
Infectious Agents and Cancer ONCOLOGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Infectious Agents and Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses all aspects of basic, clinical, epidemiological and translational research providing an insight into the association between chronic infections and cancer. The journal welcomes submissions in the pathogen-related cancer areas and other related topics, in particular: • HPV and anogenital cancers, as well as head and neck cancers; • EBV and Burkitt lymphoma; • HCV/HBV and hepatocellular carcinoma as well as lymphoproliferative diseases; • HHV8 and Kaposi sarcoma; • HTLV and leukemia; • Cancers in Low- and Middle-income countries. The link between infection and cancer has become well established over the past 50 years, and infection-associated cancer contribute up to 16% of cancers in developed countries and 33% in less developed countries. Preventive vaccines have been developed for only two cancer-causing viruses, highlighting both the opportunity to prevent infection-associated cancers by vaccination and the gaps that remain before vaccines can be developed for other cancer-causing agents. These gaps are due to incomplete understanding of the basic biology, natural history, epidemiology of many of the pathogens that cause cancer, the mechanisms they exploit to cause cancer, and how to interrupt progression to cancer in human populations. Early diagnosis or identification of lesions at high risk of progression represent the current most critical research area of the field supported by recent advances in genomics and proteomics technologies.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus transmission in rural Ugandan households, a longitudinal study. Human papillomaviruses in hand squamous cell carcinomas from Chilean patients. cIAP-2 protein is upregulated by human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal cancers: role in radioresistance in vitro. Real-world treatment outcomes for Hodgkin lymphoma in South Africa: a prospective observational study. Case report: is necrotizing fasciitis in a rectal cancer patient after targeted systemic therapy related to the tumor site? - evidence from a hepatocellular carcinoma patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1