Medication adherence of bisphosphonate weekly or monthly regimens in patients with osteoporosis using a nationwide large claims database.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Pharmazie Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.1691/ph.2023.3596
R Kuchira, K Momo, Y Kiryu, T Sasaki
{"title":"Medication adherence of bisphosphonate weekly or monthly regimens in patients with osteoporosis using a nationwide large claims database.","authors":"R Kuchira, K Momo, Y Kiryu, T Sasaki","doi":"10.1691/ph.2023.3596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bisphosphonate (BPN) therapy, which mainly targets osteoporosis, evolves rapidly, leaving patients and physicians with a substantial collection of BPN regimen options. In this study, we aimed to clarify BPN medication adherence between weekly and monthly regimens using a nationwide claims database in Japan. We analyzed 5,016 patients with a screening period of 3 months and a 12 month observation period who started using BPN. We used propensity score matching with baseline patient background after dividing the patients into two groups: weekly and monthly BPN users. Medication adherence was calculated using proportion days cover (PDC). A PDC of > 80% was 55.9% and 52.5% in monthly and weekly formulas, respectively, during the 12 months after initiating BPN treatment. PDC-based BPN medication adherence was higher in monthly regimens than in weekly regimens (66.3±34.0 vs. 64.1±36.8%). No differences were found in the proportion of patients with > 80% medication adherence between the monthly and weekly regimens after stratifying patient background using propensity score matching. Our clinical findings highlight the importance of closely monitoring BPN medication adherence, particularly during the initial year of therapy. Notably, half of the patients with osteoporosis exhibited low medication adherence. Therefore, prioritizing monthly regimens over weekly regimens is crucial to promote BPN adherence and ensure optimal treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20145,"journal":{"name":"Pharmazie","volume":"78 9","pages":"207-211"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmazie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2023.3596","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bisphosphonate (BPN) therapy, which mainly targets osteoporosis, evolves rapidly, leaving patients and physicians with a substantial collection of BPN regimen options. In this study, we aimed to clarify BPN medication adherence between weekly and monthly regimens using a nationwide claims database in Japan. We analyzed 5,016 patients with a screening period of 3 months and a 12 month observation period who started using BPN. We used propensity score matching with baseline patient background after dividing the patients into two groups: weekly and monthly BPN users. Medication adherence was calculated using proportion days cover (PDC). A PDC of > 80% was 55.9% and 52.5% in monthly and weekly formulas, respectively, during the 12 months after initiating BPN treatment. PDC-based BPN medication adherence was higher in monthly regimens than in weekly regimens (66.3±34.0 vs. 64.1±36.8%). No differences were found in the proportion of patients with > 80% medication adherence between the monthly and weekly regimens after stratifying patient background using propensity score matching. Our clinical findings highlight the importance of closely monitoring BPN medication adherence, particularly during the initial year of therapy. Notably, half of the patients with osteoporosis exhibited low medication adherence. Therefore, prioritizing monthly regimens over weekly regimens is crucial to promote BPN adherence and ensure optimal treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨质疏松症患者双膦酸盐每周或每月治疗方案的依从性使用全国大型索赔数据库。
双膦酸盐(BPN)治疗,主要针对骨质疏松症,发展迅速,给患者和医生留下了大量的BPN方案选择。在这项研究中,我们的目的是利用日本全国索赔数据库澄清BPN药物依从性之间的每周和每月方案。我们分析了5016例开始使用BPN的患者,筛查期为3个月,观察期为12个月。在将患者分为两组:每周和每月BPN使用者后,我们使用与基线患者背景匹配的倾向评分。用药依从性采用比例天数(PDC)计算。在开始BPN治疗后的12个月内,每月和每周配方的PDC值分别为55.9%和52.5%,> 80%。基于pdc的BPN用药依从性在每月方案中高于每周方案(66.3±34.0比64.1±36.8%)。在使用倾向评分匹配对患者背景进行分层后,发现每月和每周治疗方案中> 80%药物依从性的患者比例没有差异。我们的临床研究结果强调了密切监测BPN药物依从性的重要性,特别是在治疗的最初一年。值得注意的是,一半的骨质疏松症患者表现出较低的药物依从性。因此,优先考虑每月治疗方案而不是每周治疗方案对于促进BPN依从性和确保最佳治疗结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmazie
Pharmazie 医学-化学综合
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
1.2 months
期刊介绍: The journal DiePharmazie publishs reviews, experimental studies, letters to the editor, as well as book reviews. The following fields of pharmacy are covered: Pharmaceutical and medicinal chemistry; Pharmaceutical analysis and drug control; Pharmaceutical technolgy; Biopharmacy (biopharmaceutics, pharmacokinetics, biotransformation); Experimental and clinical pharmacology; Pharmaceutical biology (pharmacognosy); Clinical pharmacy; History of pharmacy.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of progression-free and overall survival in ovarian cancer: Bevacizumab treatment outcomes using historical cohort. Comparison of pharmacotherapeutic analgesic response and safety profile of tapentadol with other opioids. Cross-reactivity of triptans and sulfonamide antibiotics - a clinically relevant question? Impact of medication reconciliation and medication reviews on the incidence of preventable adverse drug reactions during hospitalization of elderly patients. A randomized controlled trial. Potential effects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication on body height and body weight in a longitudinal pediatric cohort study, the LIFE Child study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1