Outcome of stroke patients eligible to mechanical thrombectomy managed by spoke center, primary stroke center or comprehensive stroke center in the East of France

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revue neurologique Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neurol.2023.08.020
W. Abou Loukoul , S. Richard , G. Mione , S. Finitsis , A.-L. Derelle , F. Zhu , L. Liao , R. Anxionnat , M. Douarinou , L. Humbertjean , B. Gory
{"title":"Outcome of stroke patients eligible to mechanical thrombectomy managed by spoke center, primary stroke center or comprehensive stroke center in the East of France","authors":"W. Abou Loukoul ,&nbsp;S. Richard ,&nbsp;G. Mione ,&nbsp;S. Finitsis ,&nbsp;A.-L. Derelle ,&nbsp;F. Zhu ,&nbsp;L. Liao ,&nbsp;R. Anxionnat ,&nbsp;M. Douarinou ,&nbsp;L. Humbertjean ,&nbsp;B. Gory","doi":"10.1016/j.neurol.2023.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p><span>Patients with suspected stroke are referred to the nearest hospital and are managed either in a spoke center (SC), a primary stroke center (PSC), or a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) in order to benefit from early intravenous thrombolysis<span> (IVT). In case of large vessel occlusion (LVO), </span></span>mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is only performed in the CSC, whereas the effectiveness of MT is highly time-dependent. There is a debate about the best management model of patients with suspected LVO. Therefore, we aimed to compare functional and safety outcomes of LVO patients eligible for MT managed through our regional telestroke system.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>We performed a retrospective analysis of our observational prospective clinical registry in all consecutive subjects with LVO within six hours of onset who were admitted to the SC, PSC, or CSC in the east of France between October 2017 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was the functional independence defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Secondary endpoints were functional outcome, early neurological improvement, symptomatic </span>intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>Among the 794 included patients with LVO who underwent MT, 122 (15.4%) were managed by a SC, 403 (50.8%) were first admitted to a PSC, and 269 (33.9%) were first admitted to the CSC. The overall median NIHSS<span> and ASPECTS score were 16 and 8, respectively. Multivariate analysis did not find any significant difference for the primary endpoint between patients managed by PSC versus CSC (OR 1.06 [95% CI 0.64;1.76], </span></span><em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.82) and between patient managed by SC versus CSC (OR 0.69 [0.34;1.40], <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <span>0.30). No difference between the three groups was found except for the parenchymal hematoma rate between PSC and CSC (15.7 versus 7.4%, OR 2.25 [1.07;4.74], </span><em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.032).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Compared with a first admission to a CSC, the clinical outcomes of stroke patients with LVO eligible for MT first admitted to a SC or a PSC are similar.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21321,"journal":{"name":"Revue neurologique","volume":"180 6","pages":"Pages 517-523"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue neurologique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003537872301113X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Patients with suspected stroke are referred to the nearest hospital and are managed either in a spoke center (SC), a primary stroke center (PSC), or a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) in order to benefit from early intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). In case of large vessel occlusion (LVO), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is only performed in the CSC, whereas the effectiveness of MT is highly time-dependent. There is a debate about the best management model of patients with suspected LVO. Therefore, we aimed to compare functional and safety outcomes of LVO patients eligible for MT managed through our regional telestroke system.

Method

We performed a retrospective analysis of our observational prospective clinical registry in all consecutive subjects with LVO within six hours of onset who were admitted to the SC, PSC, or CSC in the east of France between October 2017 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was the functional independence defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) score 0 to 2 at 90 days. Secondary endpoints were functional outcome, early neurological improvement, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 90-day mortality.

Results

Among the 794 included patients with LVO who underwent MT, 122 (15.4%) were managed by a SC, 403 (50.8%) were first admitted to a PSC, and 269 (33.9%) were first admitted to the CSC. The overall median NIHSS and ASPECTS score were 16 and 8, respectively. Multivariate analysis did not find any significant difference for the primary endpoint between patients managed by PSC versus CSC (OR 1.06 [95% CI 0.64;1.76], P = 0.82) and between patient managed by SC versus CSC (OR 0.69 [0.34;1.40], P = 0.30). No difference between the three groups was found except for the parenchymal hematoma rate between PSC and CSC (15.7 versus 7.4%, OR 2.25 [1.07;4.74], P = 0.032).

Conclusions

Compared with a first admission to a CSC, the clinical outcomes of stroke patients with LVO eligible for MT first admitted to a SC or a PSC are similar.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在法国东部,卒中中心、初级卒中中心或综合卒中中心接受机械取栓治疗的卒中患者的结果。
背景和目的:疑似中风的患者被转诊到最近的医院,并在spoke中心(SC)、primary卒中中心(PSC)或comprehensive卒中中心(CSC)进行治疗,以便从早期静脉溶栓(IVT)中获益。在大血管闭塞(LVO)的情况下,机械取栓(MT)仅在CSC中进行,而MT的有效性高度依赖于时间。对于疑似LVO患者的最佳管理模式存在争议。因此,我们的目的是比较通过我们的区域性远程卒中系统进行MT管理的LVO患者的功能和安全性结果。方法:我们对2017年10月至2022年11月在法国东部的SC、PSC或CSC住院的所有连续6小时内LVO患者的观察性前瞻性临床登记进行了回顾性分析。主要终点是功能独立性,定义为90天时修改的Rankin量表(mRS)评分0到2分。次要终点是功能结局、早期神经系统改善、症状性颅内出血和90天死亡率。结果:在794例接受MT治疗的LVO患者中,122例(15.4%)接受SC治疗,403例(50.8%)首次入住PSC, 269例(33.9%)首次入住CSC。NIHSS和ASPECTS的总中位数分别为16分和8分。多因素分析未发现PSC与CSC患者的主要终点有显著差异(OR 1.06 [95% CI 0.64;1.76], P=0.82), SC与CSC患者的主要终点有显著差异(OR 0.69 [0.34;1.40], P=0.30)。除了PSC和CSC的实质血肿率(15.7 vs 7.4%, OR 2.25 [1.07;4.74], P=0.032)外,三组间无差异。结论:与首次入住CSC相比,首次入住SC或PSC的符合MT条件的LVO卒中患者的临床结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revue neurologique
Revue neurologique 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
598
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: The first issue of the Revue Neurologique, featuring an original article by Jean-Martin Charcot, was published on February 28th, 1893. Six years later, the French Society of Neurology (SFN) adopted this journal as its official publication in the year of its foundation, 1899. The Revue Neurologique was published throughout the 20th century without interruption and is indexed in all international databases (including Current Contents, Pubmed, Scopus). Ten annual issues provide original peer-reviewed clinical and research articles, and review articles giving up-to-date insights in all areas of neurology. The Revue Neurologique also publishes guidelines and recommendations. The Revue Neurologique publishes original articles, brief reports, general reviews, editorials, and letters to the editor as well as correspondence concerning articles previously published in the journal in the correspondence column.
期刊最新文献
Psychiatric and cognitive symptoms of Parkinson's disease: A life's tale. Primary central nervous system lymphoma of the spinal cord: A LOC network cohort study. SUNCT onset following ophthalmic-distribution zoster: Description of a case and review of the literature. Multiple sclerosis and vascular nexus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and mortality. Update of French migraine epidemiology: A narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1