Hospitals' electronic access to information needed to treat COVID-19.

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2023-11-22 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad103
Chelsea Richwine, Jordan Everson, Vaishali Patel
{"title":"Hospitals' electronic access to information needed to treat COVID-19.","authors":"Chelsea Richwine, Jordan Everson, Vaishali Patel","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand whether hospitals had electronic access to information needed to treat COVID-19 patients and identify factors contributing to differences in information availability.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Using 2021 data from the American Hospital Association IT Supplement, we produced national estimates on the electronic availability of information needed to treat COVID-19 at US non-federal acute care hospitals (<i>N</i> = 1976) and assessed differences in information availability by hospital characteristics and engagement in interoperable exchange.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2021, 38% of hospitals electronically received information needed to effectively treat COVID-19 patients. Information availability was significantly higher among higher-resourced hospitals and those engaged in interoperable exchange (44%) compared to their counterparts. In adjusted analyses, hospitals engaged in interoperable exchange were 140% more likely to receive needed information electronically compared to those not engaged in exchange (relative risk [RR]=2.40, 95% CI, 1.82-3.17, <i>P</i><.001). System member hospitals (RR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.36-1.92, <i>P</i><.001) and major teaching hospitals (RR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.10-1.64, <i>P</i>=.004) were more likely to have information available; for-profit hospitals (RR = 0.14, 95% CI, 0.08-0.24, <i>P</i><.001) and hospitals in high social deprivation areas (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71-0.98, <i>P</i> = .02) were less likely to have information available.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite high rates of hospitals' engagement in interoperable exchange, hospitals' electronic access to information needed to support the care of COVID-19 patients was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited electronic access to patient information from outside sources may impede hospitals' ability to effectively treat COVID-19 and support patient care during public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"6 4","pages":"ooad103"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10684259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand whether hospitals had electronic access to information needed to treat COVID-19 patients and identify factors contributing to differences in information availability.

Materials and methods: Using 2021 data from the American Hospital Association IT Supplement, we produced national estimates on the electronic availability of information needed to treat COVID-19 at US non-federal acute care hospitals (N = 1976) and assessed differences in information availability by hospital characteristics and engagement in interoperable exchange.

Results: In 2021, 38% of hospitals electronically received information needed to effectively treat COVID-19 patients. Information availability was significantly higher among higher-resourced hospitals and those engaged in interoperable exchange (44%) compared to their counterparts. In adjusted analyses, hospitals engaged in interoperable exchange were 140% more likely to receive needed information electronically compared to those not engaged in exchange (relative risk [RR]=2.40, 95% CI, 1.82-3.17, P<.001). System member hospitals (RR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.36-1.92, P<.001) and major teaching hospitals (RR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.10-1.64, P=.004) were more likely to have information available; for-profit hospitals (RR = 0.14, 95% CI, 0.08-0.24, P<.001) and hospitals in high social deprivation areas (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71-0.98, P = .02) were less likely to have information available.

Discussion: Despite high rates of hospitals' engagement in interoperable exchange, hospitals' electronic access to information needed to support the care of COVID-19 patients was limited.

Conclusion: Limited electronic access to patient information from outside sources may impede hospitals' ability to effectively treat COVID-19 and support patient care during public health emergencies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院对治疗COVID-19所需信息的电子访问。
目的:了解医院是否拥有治疗COVID-19患者所需信息的电子访问,并确定导致信息可用性差异的因素。材料和方法:使用来自美国医院协会IT增刊的2021年数据,我们对美国非联邦急症护理医院治疗COVID-19所需信息的电子可用性进行了全国估计(N = 1976),并根据医院特征和参与互操作交换评估了信息可用性的差异。结果:2021年,38%的医院以电子方式接收有效治疗COVID-19患者所需的信息。与其他医院相比,资源丰富的医院和参与互操作交换的医院(44%)的信息可用性明显更高。在调整后的分析中,参与互操作交换的医院获得所需电子信息的可能性比不参与交换的医院高140%(相对风险[RR]=2.40, 95% CI, 1.82-3.17, PPP= 0.004),更有可能获得信息;营利性医院(RR = 0.14, 95% CI, 0.08-0.24, PP = 0.02)获得信息的可能性较小。讨论:尽管医院参与互操作交换的比例很高,但医院对支持COVID-19患者护理所需信息的电子访问有限。结论:从外部来源获取患者信息的电子途径有限,可能会阻碍医院在突发公共卫生事件中有效治疗COVID-19和支持患者护理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multi-modal pediatric critical care datamart for extracorporeal support prediction and decision support. Provider and information technology operations staff perspectives on the feasibility of writing patient-generated health data into the electronic health record. Nested order panels for adult primary care modestly improves ordering efficiency among high utilizers. Quality of life analysis in community pharmacy using deep learning and explainability methods. Identifying false-positive drug allergy alerts based on drug tolerance assertions: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1