Novel Dosing and Monitoring of Aspirin in Infants With Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt Physiology: the SOPRANO Study.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.610
Joshua W Branstetter, Gary Woods, Hania Zaki, Nicole Coolidge, Tawanda Zinyandu, Subhadra Shashidharan, Alaa Aljiffry
{"title":"Novel Dosing and Monitoring of Aspirin in Infants With Systemic-to-Pulmonary Artery Shunt Physiology: the SOPRANO Study.","authors":"Joshua W Branstetter, Gary Woods, Hania Zaki, Nicole Coolidge, Tawanda Zinyandu, Subhadra Shashidharan, Alaa Aljiffry","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Provision of pulmonary blood flow with a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt is essential in some patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Traditionally, aspirin (ASA) has been used to prevent thrombosis. We evaluated ASA dosing with 2 separate antiplatelet monitoring tests for accuracy and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective, pre-post intervention single center study. Two cohorts were evaluated; the pre-intervention group used thromboelastography platelet mapping (TPM) and post-intervention used VerifyNow aspirin reactivity unit (ARU) monitoring. The primary endpoint was to compare therapeutic effect of TPM and ARU with regard to platelet inhibition. Inadequate platelet inhibition was defined as TPM <50% inhibition and ARU >550.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 49 patients were analyzed: 25 in the TPM group and 24 in the ARU group. Baseline characteristics were similar amongst the cohorts. The TPM group had significantly more patients with inadequate platelet inhibition (14 [56%] vs 2 [8%]; p = 0.0006) and required escalation with additional thromboprophylaxis (15 [60%] vs 5 [21%]). There was no difference in shunt thrombosis (1 [2%] vs 0 [0%]; p = 0.32), cyanosis requiring early re-intervention (9 [36%] vs 14 [58%]; p = 0.11), or bleeding (15 [60%] vs 14 [58%]; p = 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With similar cohorts and the same ASA-dosing nomogram, ARU monitoring resulted in a reduced need for escalation of care and concomitant thromboprophylaxis with no difference in adverse outcomes. Our study suggests ARU monitoring compared with TPM may be a more reliable therapeutic platelet inhibition test for determining ASA sensitivity in children with congenital heart disease requiring systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Provision of pulmonary blood flow with a systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt is essential in some patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease. Traditionally, aspirin (ASA) has been used to prevent thrombosis. We evaluated ASA dosing with 2 separate antiplatelet monitoring tests for accuracy and reliability.

Methods: This is a retrospective, pre-post intervention single center study. Two cohorts were evaluated; the pre-intervention group used thromboelastography platelet mapping (TPM) and post-intervention used VerifyNow aspirin reactivity unit (ARU) monitoring. The primary endpoint was to compare therapeutic effect of TPM and ARU with regard to platelet inhibition. Inadequate platelet inhibition was defined as TPM <50% inhibition and ARU >550.

Results: Data from 49 patients were analyzed: 25 in the TPM group and 24 in the ARU group. Baseline characteristics were similar amongst the cohorts. The TPM group had significantly more patients with inadequate platelet inhibition (14 [56%] vs 2 [8%]; p = 0.0006) and required escalation with additional thromboprophylaxis (15 [60%] vs 5 [21%]). There was no difference in shunt thrombosis (1 [2%] vs 0 [0%]; p = 0.32), cyanosis requiring early re-intervention (9 [36%] vs 14 [58%]; p = 0.11), or bleeding (15 [60%] vs 14 [58%]; p = 0.66).

Conclusion: With similar cohorts and the same ASA-dosing nomogram, ARU monitoring resulted in a reduced need for escalation of care and concomitant thromboprophylaxis with no difference in adverse outcomes. Our study suggests ARU monitoring compared with TPM may be a more reliable therapeutic platelet inhibition test for determining ASA sensitivity in children with congenital heart disease requiring systemic-to-pulmonary artery shunt.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新剂量的阿司匹林和监测婴儿与系统到肺动脉分流生理学:SOPRANO研究。
目的:在一些紫绀型先天性心脏病患者中,通过全身到肺动脉分流提供肺血流是必不可少的。传统上,阿司匹林(ASA)被用来预防血栓形成。我们用2个单独的抗血小板监测试验评估ASA剂量的准确性和可靠性。方法:这是一项回顾性、干预前后单中心研究。评估了两个队列;干预前组采用血栓弹性成像血小板制图(TPM),干预后采用VerifyNow阿司匹林反应单元(ARU)监测。主要终点是比较TPM和ARU在血小板抑制方面的治疗效果。血小板抑制不足定义为TPM 550。结果:分析49例患者的资料:TPM组25例,ARU组24例。基线特征在队列中相似。TPM组血小板抑制不足的患者明显更多(14例[56%]vs 2例[8%]);P = 0.0006),并且需要增加额外的血栓预防(15[60%]对5[21%])。分流血栓发生率无差异(1 [2%]vs 0 [0%];P = 0.32),发绀需要早期再干预(9例[36%]vs 14例[58%];P = 0.11)或出血(15例[60%]vs 14例[58%];P = 0.66)。结论:在相似的队列和相同的asa给药图中,ARU监测导致对护理升级和伴随的血栓预防的需求减少,不良结局没有差异。我们的研究表明,与TPM相比,ARU监测可能是一种更可靠的治疗性血小板抑制试验,用于确定需要全身到肺动脉分流术的先天性心脏病患儿的ASA敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Analysis of Micafungin Prophylaxis in Children Under 12 Years Undergoing Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. AI-Assisted Academia: Navigating the Nuances of Peer Review With ChatGPT 4. An Analysis of pH and Sugar Content of Commonly Prescribed Pediatric Liquid Medications: The Current Indian Scenario. Artificial Intelligence Opportunities to Guide Precision Dosing Strategies. Characterization of Awareness and Depth of Blockade During Neuromuscular Blockade Infusions in Critically Ill Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1