Associated factors for bacterial colonization in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases.

IF 1.7 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES GERMS Pub Date : 2023-03-31 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.18683/germs.2023.1362
Nicoleta-Dorina Vlad, Septimiu Voidăzan, Andreea Căpâlnă, Roxana-Carmen Cernat, Sorina-Dalia Carp, Romelia Mitan, Andrei Dumitru, Sorin Rugină, Codruţa Nemet, Irina Magdalena Dumitru
{"title":"Associated factors for bacterial colonization in patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the Clinical Hospital of Infectious Diseases.","authors":"Nicoleta-Dorina Vlad, Septimiu Voidăzan, Andreea Căpâlnă, Roxana-Carmen Cernat, Sorina-Dalia Carp, Romelia Mitan, Andrei Dumitru, Sorin Rugină, Codruţa Nemet, Irina Magdalena Dumitru","doi":"10.18683/germs.2023.1362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to identify isolates from colonization and assess the risk factors for bacterial colonization and the risk of death in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Constanţa County Infectious Diseases Hospital between September 2017 and September 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective case-control study in a single center that included all patients admitted to the ICU in Constanţa, Romania, who underwent bacteriological screening upon admission and 7 days after admission, between September 2017 and September 2019. In total, 253 patients were included in this study. The nasal exudate, pharyngeal exudate, and rectal swab samples were screened.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 253 patients were screened bacteriologically, of which 53 had bacterial colonization and 200 did not. Among the bacterial strains, <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. (43.39%) was the most frequently isolated. The predominant resistance mechanism detected in the bacterial isolates was extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). Multivariate analysis identified a Carmeli score of 3 as an independent risk factor for acquiring bacterial colonization in the ICU. The mortality rate of patients with bacterial colonization was 11.32% and 6% for the patients without colonization (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed an increased prevalence of Enterobacterales colonization in the ICU. Risk factors for acquiring bacterial colonization differed depending on the type of bacterial colonization, such as ESBL, carbapenemases, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). An independent risk factor for acquiring bacterial colonization was the Carmeli score of 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":45107,"journal":{"name":"GERMS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10659752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2023.1362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to identify isolates from colonization and assess the risk factors for bacterial colonization and the risk of death in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Constanţa County Infectious Diseases Hospital between September 2017 and September 2019.

Methods: This was a retrospective case-control study in a single center that included all patients admitted to the ICU in Constanţa, Romania, who underwent bacteriological screening upon admission and 7 days after admission, between September 2017 and September 2019. In total, 253 patients were included in this study. The nasal exudate, pharyngeal exudate, and rectal swab samples were screened.

Results: In this study, 253 patients were screened bacteriologically, of which 53 had bacterial colonization and 200 did not. Among the bacterial strains, Klebsiella spp. (43.39%) was the most frequently isolated. The predominant resistance mechanism detected in the bacterial isolates was extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). Multivariate analysis identified a Carmeli score of 3 as an independent risk factor for acquiring bacterial colonization in the ICU. The mortality rate of patients with bacterial colonization was 11.32% and 6% for the patients without colonization (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Our study revealed an increased prevalence of Enterobacterales colonization in the ICU. Risk factors for acquiring bacterial colonization differed depending on the type of bacterial colonization, such as ESBL, carbapenemases, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). An independent risk factor for acquiring bacterial colonization was the Carmeli score of 3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
传染病临床医院重症监护病房住院患者细菌定植的相关因素
前言:本研究旨在鉴定2017年9月至2019年9月Constanţa县传染病医院重症监护病房(ICU)住院患者的细菌定植分离株,并评估细菌定植的危险因素和死亡风险。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性病例对照研究,纳入了2017年9月至2019年9月期间在罗马尼亚Constanţa ICU住院的所有患者,这些患者在入院时和入院后7天接受了细菌学筛查。本研究共纳入253例患者。筛选鼻分泌物、咽分泌物和直肠拭子样本。结果:本研究对253例患者进行细菌学筛查,其中53例有细菌定植,200例无细菌定植。检出最多的是克雷伯氏菌,占43.39%。菌株的主要耐药机制为广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)。多变量分析表明,卡梅利评分为3分是ICU中获得细菌定植的独立危险因素。细菌定植组死亡率为11.32%,未定植组死亡率为6% (p>0.05)。结论:我们的研究揭示了ICU中肠杆菌定植的患病率增加。获得细菌定植的危险因素取决于细菌定植的类型,如ESBL、碳青霉烯酶、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)和耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)。获得细菌定植的独立危险因素是卡梅利评分为3分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GERMS
GERMS INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans endocarditis in an adult patient with patent ductus arteriosus. Clinical spectrum of extrapulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial disease in immunocompetent patients: a case series. Clinical, epidemiological and molecular aspects of patients with mpox in Romania. Continuous versus intermittent infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics: where do we stand today? A narrative review. Infective endocarditis by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria - a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1