Does lower-limb osteoarthritis alter motor cortex descending drive and voluntary activation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Efort Open Reviews Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1530/EOR-23-0092
Myles C Murphy, Christopher Latella, Ebonie K Rio, Janet L Taylor, Stephanie Martino, Colin Sylvester, William Hale, Andrea B Mosler
{"title":"Does lower-limb osteoarthritis alter motor cortex descending drive and voluntary activation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Myles C Murphy, Christopher Latella, Ebonie K Rio, Janet L Taylor, Stephanie Martino, Colin Sylvester, William Hale, Andrea B Mosler","doi":"10.1530/EOR-23-0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to quantify motor cortex descending drive and voluntary activation (VA) in people with lower-limb OA compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines was carried out. Seven databases were searched until 30 December 2022. Studies assessing VA or responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; i.e. motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and silent period) were included. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute criteria and evidence certainty using GRADE. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan inverse variance, mixed-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were included, all deemed low-quality. Quadriceps VA was impaired with knee OA compared to healthy controls (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.84, 95% CI = -1.12-0.56, low certainty). VA of the more symptomatic limb was impaired (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.75-0.09, moderate certainty) compared to the other limb in people with hip/knee OA. As only two studies assessed responses to TMS, very low-certainty evidence demonstrated no significant difference between knee OA and healthy controls for motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, resting motor threshold or short-interval intracortical inhibition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-certainty evidence suggests people with knee OA have substantial impairments in VA of their quadriceps muscle when compared to healthy controls. With moderate certainty we conclude that people with hip and knee OA had larger impairments in VA of the quadriceps in their more painful limb compared to their non-affected/other limb.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714386/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to quantify motor cortex descending drive and voluntary activation (VA) in people with lower-limb OA compared to controls.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines was carried out. Seven databases were searched until 30 December 2022. Studies assessing VA or responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; i.e. motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, motor threshold, short-interval intracortical inhibition, and silent period) were included. Study quality was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute criteria and evidence certainty using GRADE. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan inverse variance, mixed-effect models.

Results: Eighteen studies were included, all deemed low-quality. Quadriceps VA was impaired with knee OA compared to healthy controls (standardised mean difference (SMD) = 0.84, 95% CI = -1.12-0.56, low certainty). VA of the more symptomatic limb was impaired (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.75-0.09, moderate certainty) compared to the other limb in people with hip/knee OA. As only two studies assessed responses to TMS, very low-certainty evidence demonstrated no significant difference between knee OA and healthy controls for motor evoked potential, intracortical facilitation, resting motor threshold or short-interval intracortical inhibition.

Conclusions: Low-certainty evidence suggests people with knee OA have substantial impairments in VA of their quadriceps muscle when compared to healthy controls. With moderate certainty we conclude that people with hip and knee OA had larger impairments in VA of the quadriceps in their more painful limb compared to their non-affected/other limb.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢骨关节炎是否改变运动皮质下降驱动和自主激活?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本研究的目的是量化与对照组相比,下肢OA患者的运动皮质下降驱动和自愿激活(VA)。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。截至2022年12月30日,对七个数据库进行了搜索。评估VA或经颅磁刺激(TMS)反应的研究;包括运动诱发电位、皮质内促进、运动阈值、短间隔皮质内抑制和沉默期。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所标准评估研究质量,采用GRADE评估证据确定性。meta分析采用RevMan反方差混合效应模型。结果:纳入了18项研究,均为低质量研究。与健康对照相比,膝关节OA患者的股四头肌前部受损(标准化平均差(SMD) = 0.84, 95% CI = -1.12-0.56,低确定性)。与髋关节/膝关节OA患者的其他肢体相比,更有症状的肢体的VA受损(SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.75-0.09,中等确定性)。由于只有两项研究评估了经颅磁刺激的反应,非常低确定性的证据表明,膝关节OA与健康对照组在运动诱发电位、皮质内促进、静息运动阈值或短间隔皮质内抑制方面没有显著差异。结论:低确定性证据表明,与健康对照相比,膝关节OA患者的股四头肌VA有实质性损伤。我们可以适度肯定地得出结论,与未受影响/其他肢体相比,患有髋关节和膝关节OA的人在更疼痛的肢体中有更大的股四头肌VA损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaplan fibers of iliotibial band: a comprehensive review of current literature. Native intra-articular knee microbiome is a matter of facts: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1