Does transperineal ultrasound predict the risk of perineal trauma in women with term pregnancy? A prospective observational study.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-19 DOI:10.14366/usg.23045
Serena Xodo, Giulia Trombetta, Caterina Morassutto, Giovanni Baccarini, Lisa Celante, Lorenza Driul, Ambrogio P Londero
{"title":"Does transperineal ultrasound predict the risk of perineal trauma in women with term pregnancy? A prospective observational study.","authors":"Serena Xodo, Giulia Trombetta, Caterina Morassutto, Giovanni Baccarini, Lisa Celante, Lorenza Driul, Ambrogio P Londero","doi":"10.14366/usg.23045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of perineal trauma during childbirth and to assess the correlations of the pelvic floor dimensions and fetal head station with obstetric trauma in a prospectively recruited cohort of women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included women with a gestational age of at least 37 weeks, who were carrying a single fetus in a cephalic presentation. Transperineal ultrasound (TPU) was performed prior to the onset of labor or labor induction. The purpose was to measure the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the levator ani muscle (LAM) and the angle of progression, at both rest and maximum Valsalva maneuver. The head-perineum distance was assessed only at rest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 296 women were included. Of the 253 women who delivered vaginally, 19% (48/253) experienced no perineal trauma, 18.2% (46/253) received an episiotomy during childbirth, 34.4% (87/253) sustained a first-degree laceration, 25.3% (64/253) had a second-degree laceration, and 3.2% had a third- or fourth-degree laceration (8/253). Women with episiotomy had a significantly shorter median APD under Valsalva than women without perineal trauma. Furthermore, women with LAM coactivation (identified by a negative difference between the APD at Valsalva and the APD at rest) were approximately three times more likely to undergo an operative vaginal delivery and over five times more likely to sustain a third- or fourth-degree tear during childbirth than women who exhibited normal relaxation of the LAM during the Valsalva maneuver.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPU may predict the risk of perineal trauma in women with term pregnancy during childbirth.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14366/usg.23045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of perineal trauma during childbirth and to assess the correlations of the pelvic floor dimensions and fetal head station with obstetric trauma in a prospectively recruited cohort of women.

Methods: The study included women with a gestational age of at least 37 weeks, who were carrying a single fetus in a cephalic presentation. Transperineal ultrasound (TPU) was performed prior to the onset of labor or labor induction. The purpose was to measure the anteroposterior diameter (APD) of the levator ani muscle (LAM) and the angle of progression, at both rest and maximum Valsalva maneuver. The head-perineum distance was assessed only at rest.

Results: A total of 296 women were included. Of the 253 women who delivered vaginally, 19% (48/253) experienced no perineal trauma, 18.2% (46/253) received an episiotomy during childbirth, 34.4% (87/253) sustained a first-degree laceration, 25.3% (64/253) had a second-degree laceration, and 3.2% had a third- or fourth-degree laceration (8/253). Women with episiotomy had a significantly shorter median APD under Valsalva than women without perineal trauma. Furthermore, women with LAM coactivation (identified by a negative difference between the APD at Valsalva and the APD at rest) were approximately three times more likely to undergo an operative vaginal delivery and over five times more likely to sustain a third- or fourth-degree tear during childbirth than women who exhibited normal relaxation of the LAM during the Valsalva maneuver.

Conclusion: TPU may predict the risk of perineal trauma in women with term pregnancy during childbirth.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经会阴超声能否预测足月妊娠妇女会阴创伤的风险?一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估分娩过程中会阴创伤的发生率,并评估骨盆底尺寸和胎儿头位与产科创伤的相关性。方法:该研究包括孕龄至少37周的妇女,她们在头位表现中携带一个胎儿。经会阴超声(TPU)在分娩或引产前进行。目的是测量在休息和最大Valsalva动作时提肛肌(LAM)的前后直径(APD)和前进角。头会阴距离仅在静止时评估。结果:共纳入296名女性。在253名顺产妇女中,19%(48/253)没有会阴创伤,18.2%(46/253)在分娩时接受了会阴切开术,34.4%(87/253)有一级撕裂伤,25.3%(64/253)有二度撕裂伤,3.2%有三度或四度撕裂伤(8/253)。外阴切开术的女性在Valsalva下的APD中位数明显短于无会阴创伤的女性。此外,LAM共激活的女性(通过Valsalva时APD和休息时APD之间的负差异来确定)进行阴道手术分娩的可能性约为三倍,分娩时发生三度或四度撕裂的可能性超过Valsalva时LAM正常放松的女性的五倍。结论:TPU可预测足月妊娠妇女分娩时会阴创伤的发生风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1