Family Ties at End-of-Life: Characteristics of Nursing Home Decedents With and Without Family.

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2023-11-16 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2023.0023
Caroline E Stephens, Djin Tay, Eli Iacob, Michael Hollinghaus, Rebecca Goodwin, Brenna Kelly, Ken Smith, Lee Ellington, Rebecca Utz, Katherine Ornstein
{"title":"Family Ties at End-of-Life: Characteristics of Nursing Home Decedents With and Without Family.","authors":"Caroline E Stephens, Djin Tay, Eli Iacob, Michael Hollinghaus, Rebecca Goodwin, Brenna Kelly, Ken Smith, Lee Ellington, Rebecca Utz, Katherine Ornstein","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2023.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little is known about nursing home (NH) residents' family characteristics despite the important role families play at end-of-life (EOL).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the size and composition of first-degree families (FDFs) of Utah NH residents who died 1998-2016 (<i>n</i> = 43,405).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Utah Population Caregiving Database, we linked NH decedents to their FDF (<i>n</i> = 124,419; spouses = 10.8%; children = 55.3%; siblings = 32.3%) and compared sociodemographic and death characteristics of those with and without FDF members (<i>n</i> = 9424).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to NH decedents with FDF (78.3%), those without (21.7%) were more likely to be female (64.7% vs. 57.1%), non-White/Hispanic (11.2% vs. 4.2%), less educated (<9th grade; 41.1% vs. 32.4%), and die in a rural/frontier NH (25.3% vs. 24.0%, all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Despite similar levels of disease burden (Charlson Comorbidity score 3 + 37.7% vs. 38.0%), those without FDF were more likely to die from cancer (14.2% vs. 12.4%), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (6.0% vs. 4.0%), and dementia (17.1% vs. 16.6%, all <i>p</i> < 0.001), and were less likely to have 2+ hospitalizations at EOL (20.5% vs. 22.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among NH decedents, those with and without FDF have different sociodemographic and death characteristics-factors that may impact care at EOL. Understanding the nature of FDF relationship type on NH resident EOL care trajectories and outcomes is an important next step in clarifying the role of families of persons living and dying in NHs.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10664558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2023.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about nursing home (NH) residents' family characteristics despite the important role families play at end-of-life (EOL).

Objective: To describe the size and composition of first-degree families (FDFs) of Utah NH residents who died 1998-2016 (n = 43,405).

Methods: Using the Utah Population Caregiving Database, we linked NH decedents to their FDF (n = 124,419; spouses = 10.8%; children = 55.3%; siblings = 32.3%) and compared sociodemographic and death characteristics of those with and without FDF members (n = 9424).

Results: Compared to NH decedents with FDF (78.3%), those without (21.7%) were more likely to be female (64.7% vs. 57.1%), non-White/Hispanic (11.2% vs. 4.2%), less educated (<9th grade; 41.1% vs. 32.4%), and die in a rural/frontier NH (25.3% vs. 24.0%, all p < 0.001). Despite similar levels of disease burden (Charlson Comorbidity score 3 + 37.7% vs. 38.0%), those without FDF were more likely to die from cancer (14.2% vs. 12.4%), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (6.0% vs. 4.0%), and dementia (17.1% vs. 16.6%, all p < 0.001), and were less likely to have 2+ hospitalizations at EOL (20.5% vs. 22.4%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Among NH decedents, those with and without FDF have different sociodemographic and death characteristics-factors that may impact care at EOL. Understanding the nature of FDF relationship type on NH resident EOL care trajectories and outcomes is an important next step in clarifying the role of families of persons living and dying in NHs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临终时的家庭关系:有家人和没有家人的养老院死者的特征。
背景:尽管家庭在生命终结(EOL)中扮演着重要的角色,但对养老院(NH)居民的家庭特征知之甚少。目的:描述1998-2016年死亡的犹他州NH居民一级家庭(fdf)的规模和组成(n = 43,405)。方法:使用犹他州人口护理数据库,我们将NH死者与他们的FDF联系起来(n = 124,419;配偶= 10.8%;儿童= 55.3%;兄弟姐妹= 32.3%),并比较有和没有FDF成员的社会人口学和死亡特征(n = 9424)。结果:与有FDF的NH死者(78.3%)相比,没有FDF的NH死者(21.7%)更可能是女性(64.7%对57.1%)、非白人/西班牙裔(11.2%对4.2%)、受教育程度较低(p p p)。结论:在NH死者中,有和没有FDF的患者具有不同的社会人口统计学和死亡特征,这些因素可能影响EOL的护理。了解FDF关系类型对NH居民EOL护理轨迹和结果的性质,是澄清NHs中生活和死亡人员家庭角色的重要下一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1