Evaluation of the Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Ibuprofen Compared to Indomethacin.

Q2 Medicine Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.618
Cory D Jackson, Amanda C Capino, Lindsay H Stuart, Jamie L Wagner
{"title":"Evaluation of the Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus With Ibuprofen Compared to Indomethacin.","authors":"Cory D Jackson, Amanda C Capino, Lindsay H Stuart, Jamie L Wagner","doi":"10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited data exist comparing indomethacin and ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of PDA closure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, pre-test/post-test quasi-experiment included preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit who received indomethacin (July 1, 2013-September 30, 2015) or ibuprofen (December 1, 2015-July 31, 2019) for PDA. Patients were excluded if they were thrombocytopenic, had existing kidney injury, unresolved intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) at treatment initiation. Data were obtained from the electronic health record. Study outcomes were complete PDA closure, degree of PDA closure, resolution of symptoms, and new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI), IVH, or NEC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients were included: 44 (39%) received indomethacin and 70 (61%) received -ibuprofen. Twenty-one (21%) patients experienced successful PDA closure within 1 week: 13 (32%) indomethacin patients and 8 (13%) ibuprofen patients (p = 0.023). PDA size reduction occurred in 43 (46%) patients with 29 (25%) experiencing complete symptom resolution. Significantly more indomethacin patients compared with ibuprofen patients experienced new-onset AKI (48% vs 17%; p < 0.001) and received concomitant nephrotoxins (68% vs 39%; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in new-onset IVH or NEC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indomethacin administration successfully closed the PDA in more neonates than ibuprofen but resulted in higher rates of AKI. However, this was confounded by more frequent administration of concomitant nephrotoxins. Larger trials are needed to help elucidate the optimal drug for closure of the PDA in neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10681078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-28.7.618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited data exist comparing indomethacin and ibuprofen for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of indomethacin and ibuprofen for treatment of PDA closure.

Methods: This single-center, pre-test/post-test quasi-experiment included preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit who received indomethacin (July 1, 2013-September 30, 2015) or ibuprofen (December 1, 2015-July 31, 2019) for PDA. Patients were excluded if they were thrombocytopenic, had existing kidney injury, unresolved intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) at treatment initiation. Data were obtained from the electronic health record. Study outcomes were complete PDA closure, degree of PDA closure, resolution of symptoms, and new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI), IVH, or NEC.

Results: A total of 114 patients were included: 44 (39%) received indomethacin and 70 (61%) received -ibuprofen. Twenty-one (21%) patients experienced successful PDA closure within 1 week: 13 (32%) indomethacin patients and 8 (13%) ibuprofen patients (p = 0.023). PDA size reduction occurred in 43 (46%) patients with 29 (25%) experiencing complete symptom resolution. Significantly more indomethacin patients compared with ibuprofen patients experienced new-onset AKI (48% vs 17%; p < 0.001) and received concomitant nephrotoxins (68% vs 39%; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in new-onset IVH or NEC.

Conclusions: Indomethacin administration successfully closed the PDA in more neonates than ibuprofen but resulted in higher rates of AKI. However, this was confounded by more frequent administration of concomitant nephrotoxins. Larger trials are needed to help elucidate the optimal drug for closure of the PDA in neonates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布洛芬与吲哚美辛封堵动脉导管未闭的疗效比较。
目的:比较吲哚美辛与布洛芬治疗动脉导管未闭(PDA)的疗效资料有限。目的是比较吲哚美辛和布洛芬治疗PDA闭合的安全性和有效性。方法:采用单中心、测试前/测试后准实验,纳入新生儿重症监护病房接受吲哚美辛(2013年7月1日- 2015年9月30日)或布洛芬(2015年12月1日- 2019年7月31日)治疗PDA的早产儿。如果患者在治疗开始时出现血小板减少、存在肾损伤、未解决的脑室内出血(IVH)或坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC),则排除。数据来自电子健康记录。研究结果包括PDA完全闭合、PDA闭合程度、症状缓解和新发急性肾损伤(AKI)、IVH或NEC。结果:共纳入114例患者,使用吲哚美辛44例(39%),使用布洛芬70例(61%)。21例(21%)患者在1周内成功关闭PDA: 13例(32%)使用吲哚美辛,8例(13%)使用布洛芬(p = 0.023)。43例(46%)患者PDA缩小,29例(25%)患者症状完全缓解。与使用布洛芬的患者相比,使用吲哚美辛的患者有更多的新发AKI (48% vs 17%;P < 0.001)并伴有肾毒素(68% vs 39%;P = 0.002)。新发IVH和NEC无显著差异。结论:吲哚美辛比布洛芬更能有效关闭PDA,但AKI发生率较高。然而,这是混淆了更频繁的管理伴随肾毒素。需要更大规模的试验来帮助阐明关闭新生儿PDA的最佳药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
A Retrospective Analysis of Micafungin Prophylaxis in Children Under 12 Years Undergoing Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. AI-Assisted Academia: Navigating the Nuances of Peer Review With ChatGPT 4. An Analysis of pH and Sugar Content of Commonly Prescribed Pediatric Liquid Medications: The Current Indian Scenario. Artificial Intelligence Opportunities to Guide Precision Dosing Strategies. Characterization of Awareness and Depth of Blockade During Neuromuscular Blockade Infusions in Critically Ill Children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1