Impact of diverting stoma on long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer: A nationwide study based on health insurance claims data

Nobuaki Hoshino , Koya Hida , Yudai Fukui , Yoshimitsu Takahashi , Takeo Nakayama , Kazutaka Obama
{"title":"Impact of diverting stoma on long-term survival in patients with rectal cancer: A nationwide study based on health insurance claims data","authors":"Nobuaki Hoshino ,&nbsp;Koya Hida ,&nbsp;Yudai Fukui ,&nbsp;Yoshimitsu Takahashi ,&nbsp;Takeo Nakayama ,&nbsp;Kazutaka Obama","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2023.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A diverting stoma is often created to prevent anastomotic leakage when a low anterior resection (LAR) is performed for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma impacts the prognosis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We identified patients with rectal cancer in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months of surgery. Overall survival was compared according to the presence or absence of a diverting stoma. Only patients with a stoma were selected to compare overall survival according to the timing of stoma closure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients with a diverting stoma had a significantly better prognosis than those without a diverting stoma (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.99, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.039). Compared with patients with early closure, the prognosis of patients with late closure was significantly better (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.95, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.031) and that of patients without stoma closure was significantly poorer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34–3.64, <em>P</em> ​= ​0.002).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Among patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, those who had a diverting stoma had better prognosis than those who did not. Patients with a diverting stoma who underwent late closure had the best prognosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000223/pdfft?md5=2cb2b9b3a9f749bae1e0af83a2c747c4&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X23000223-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X23000223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A diverting stoma is often created to prevent anastomotic leakage when a low anterior resection (LAR) is performed for rectal cancer. However, it remains unclear how a diverting stoma impacts the prognosis.

Methods

We identified patients with rectal cancer in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan who underwent LAR in 2014 and received adjuvant chemotherapy within 12 months of surgery. Overall survival was compared according to the presence or absence of a diverting stoma. Only patients with a stoma were selected to compare overall survival according to the timing of stoma closure.

Results

Patients with a diverting stoma had a significantly better prognosis than those without a diverting stoma (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.99, P ​= ​0.039). Compared with patients with early closure, the prognosis of patients with late closure was significantly better (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.95, P ​= ​0.031) and that of patients without stoma closure was significantly poorer (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34–3.64, P ​= ​0.002).

Conclusion

Among patients with rectal cancer who underwent LAR followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, those who had a diverting stoma had better prognosis than those who did not. Patients with a diverting stoma who underwent late closure had the best prognosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移造口对直肠癌患者长期生存的影响:一项基于健康保险索赔数据的全国性研究
背景直肠癌低位前切除术(LAR)时,通常会形成一个转移口以防止吻合口漏。然而,目前尚不清楚转移造口如何影响预后。方法:我们在日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库中确定2014年接受LAR并在手术12个月内接受辅助化疗的直肠癌患者。根据是否存在转移造口来比较总生存率。只选择有造口的患者,根据造口关闭的时间来比较总生存率。结果有转移造口的患者预后明显优于无转移造口的患者(风险比[HR] 0.79, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.63 ~ 0.99, P = 0.039)。与早期闭合患者相比,晚期闭合患者的预后明显较好(HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 ~ 0.95, P = 0.031),未闭合患者的预后明显较差(HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.34 ~ 3.64, P = 0.002)。结论直肠癌术后行LAR伴辅助化疗的患者,有转移造口者预后较无转移造口者好。转移造口晚期闭合的患者预后最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surgical frontiers in metastatic disease: Shaping cancer care Individualized surgical approach based on Bismuth-Corlette classification for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma Liquid biopsy for monitoring minimal residual disease in colorectal cancer: A promising approach with clinical implications Diagnostic sensitivity of immune-inflammatory cell proportion in early diagnosis of endometrial cancer Chinese expert consensus on the pelvic exenteration for primary rectal cancer beyond total mesorectal excision planes and locally recurrent rectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1