Blueprint for community emergency department pediatric simulation

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10925
Snimarjot Kaur MBBS, William Lynders MD, Michael Goldman MD, Christie Bruno MD, Juliana Morin MSN, RN, Scott Maruschock, Marc Auerbach MD, MSci
{"title":"Blueprint for community emergency department pediatric simulation","authors":"Snimarjot Kaur MBBS,&nbsp;William Lynders MD,&nbsp;Michael Goldman MD,&nbsp;Christie Bruno MD,&nbsp;Juliana Morin MSN, RN,&nbsp;Scott Maruschock,&nbsp;Marc Auerbach MD, MSci","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Gaps in quality of pediatric emergency care have been noted in community emergency departments (CEDs), where &gt;85% of children receive care. In situ simulation provides opportunities for hands-on experiences and can help close these gaps. We aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an innovative, replicable, and scalable pediatric in situ simulation-based CED curriculum, under the leadership of a local colleague, through collaborative approach with a regional academic medical center (AMC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Kern's model was used as follows: <i>problem identification and general needs assessment</i>—pediatric readiness assessment and discussions with CED physician and nursing leadership; <i>targeted needs assessment</i>—review of recent pediatric transfer cases; <i>goals and objectives</i>—enhance pediatric knowledge and skills of interprofessional teams and detect latent safety threats; <i>educational strategies</i>—codeveloped by CED and AMC, included prelearning using podcasts and videos, simulation and facilitated debriefing, resource sharing after simulations; <i>implementation</i>—3-h simulation sessions facilitated in person by the CED team and remotely by AMC (leadership required participation and paid staff); and <i>evaluation and feedback</i>—retrospective pre–post survey, Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified (SET-M), Net Promoter Score (NPS), and review/feedback meetings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on needs assessment, the selected cases included newborn resuscitation, seizure, asthma, and tetrahydrocannabinol ingestion causing altered mental sensorium in a child. Twenty-four 3-h simulation sessions were conducted over 1 year. A total of 168 participants completed the sessions, while 75 participants (54.7% nurses, 22.7% physicians, and others) completed feedback surveys. Seventy-six percent of participants reported completing presimulation education material. Participants reported improved skills at appropriately evaluating a critically ill newborn and critically ill infant/toddler and improved teamwork during the care of a pediatric patient. The majority agreed that simulation was effective in teaching pediatric resuscitation. The NPS was 84% (excellent).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A locally facilitated CED in situ simulation curriculum was successfully developed and implemented under local leadership, with remote collaboration by AMC. The curriculum was well received and effective.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Gaps in quality of pediatric emergency care have been noted in community emergency departments (CEDs), where >85% of children receive care. In situ simulation provides opportunities for hands-on experiences and can help close these gaps. We aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate an innovative, replicable, and scalable pediatric in situ simulation-based CED curriculum, under the leadership of a local colleague, through collaborative approach with a regional academic medical center (AMC).

Methods

Kern's model was used as follows: problem identification and general needs assessment—pediatric readiness assessment and discussions with CED physician and nursing leadership; targeted needs assessment—review of recent pediatric transfer cases; goals and objectives—enhance pediatric knowledge and skills of interprofessional teams and detect latent safety threats; educational strategies—codeveloped by CED and AMC, included prelearning using podcasts and videos, simulation and facilitated debriefing, resource sharing after simulations; implementation—3-h simulation sessions facilitated in person by the CED team and remotely by AMC (leadership required participation and paid staff); and evaluation and feedback—retrospective pre–post survey, Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified (SET-M), Net Promoter Score (NPS), and review/feedback meetings.

Results

Based on needs assessment, the selected cases included newborn resuscitation, seizure, asthma, and tetrahydrocannabinol ingestion causing altered mental sensorium in a child. Twenty-four 3-h simulation sessions were conducted over 1 year. A total of 168 participants completed the sessions, while 75 participants (54.7% nurses, 22.7% physicians, and others) completed feedback surveys. Seventy-six percent of participants reported completing presimulation education material. Participants reported improved skills at appropriately evaluating a critically ill newborn and critically ill infant/toddler and improved teamwork during the care of a pediatric patient. The majority agreed that simulation was effective in teaching pediatric resuscitation. The NPS was 84% (excellent).

Conclusions

A locally facilitated CED in situ simulation curriculum was successfully developed and implemented under local leadership, with remote collaboration by AMC. The curriculum was well received and effective.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区急诊科儿科模拟的蓝图
背景:社区急诊科(CEDs)已注意到儿科急诊护理质量的差距,85%的儿童在社区急诊科接受护理。现场模拟提供了实践经验的机会,可以帮助缩小这些差距。我们的目标是通过与地区学术医疗中心(AMC)的合作方式,在当地同事的领导下,开发、实施和评估一种创新的、可复制的、可扩展的儿科原位模拟CED课程。方法采用Kern模型:问题识别和一般需求评估-儿童准备程度评估及与CED医师和护理领导的讨论;针对性需求评估-近期儿科转院病例的审查;目标和目的——提高跨专业团队的儿科知识和技能,发现潜在的安全威胁;教育策略-由CED和AMC共同开发,包括使用播客和视频进行预学习,模拟和促进汇报,模拟后资源共享;实施- 3小时的模拟会议,由CED团队亲自主持,由AMC远程主持(领导需要参与和付费员工);评估和反馈——回顾前后调查,模拟有效性工具修改(SET-M),净推荐值(NPS),以及审查/反馈会议。结果根据需求评估,选择的病例包括新生儿复苏、癫痫发作、哮喘和摄入四氢大麻酚导致儿童精神感觉改变。在1年内进行了24次3小时的模拟实验。共有168名参与者完成了这些课程,而75名参与者(54.7%的护士,22.7%的医生和其他人)完成了反馈调查。76%的参与者报告完成了模拟前的教育材料。参与者报告了适当评估危重新生儿和危重婴儿/幼儿的技能提高,以及在儿科患者护理期间改善了团队合作。大多数人认为模拟教学在儿童复苏教学中是有效的。NPS为84%(优秀)。在当地领导下,在AMC的远程合作下,成功开发并实施了当地促进的CED原位模拟课程。课程很受欢迎,效果很好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Paths to learning: How residents navigate transience in supervisory relationships in the emergency department General emergency physician perceptions of caring for children: A qualitative interview study 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0: An evidence-based mnemonic to aid recall and interpretation of heart rate values for pediatric patients presenting for acute care “Ardor and diligence”: Quantifying the faculty effort needed in emergency medicine graduate medical education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1