Evaluation of antibody drug delivery efficiency via nebulizer in various airway models and breathing patterns.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9
Soon Woo Hong, Kyung Hwa Chang, Chang Jae Woo, Ho Chul Kim, Bong Seop Kwak, Bong Joo Park, Ki Chang Nam
{"title":"Evaluation of antibody drug delivery efficiency via nebulizer in various airway models and breathing patterns.","authors":"Soon Woo Hong, Kyung Hwa Chang, Chang Jae Woo, Ho Chul Kim, Bong Seop Kwak, Bong Joo Park, Ki Chang Nam","doi":"10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nebulizers are commonly used to treat respiratory diseases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While inhalation therapy with antibodies has been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials for respiratory diseases, it has not yet been approved for treatment. Moreover, there is limited information regarding the delivery efficiency of therapeutic antibodies via nebulizer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, the nebulization characteristics and drug delivery efficiencies were compared when immunoglobulin G (IgG) was delivered by five nebulizers using two airway models and five breathing patterns. The study confirmed that the delivered dose and drug delivery efficiency were reduced in the child model compared to those in the adult model and in the asthma pattern compared to those in the normal breathing pattern.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The NE-SM1 NEPLUS vibrating mesh nebulizer demonstrated the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the loading dose, whereas the PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT (breath-enhanced) jet nebulizer had the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the emitted dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the total inspiration volume, output rate, and particle size should be considered when IgG nebulization is used. We, therefore, propose a method for evaluating the efficiency of nebulizer for predicting antibody drug delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10691028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00711-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nebulizers are commonly used to treat respiratory diseases, which are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. While inhalation therapy with antibodies has been evaluated in preclinical studies and clinical trials for respiratory diseases, it has not yet been approved for treatment. Moreover, there is limited information regarding the delivery efficiency of therapeutic antibodies via nebulizer.

Methods: In this study, the nebulization characteristics and drug delivery efficiencies were compared when immunoglobulin G (IgG) was delivered by five nebulizers using two airway models and five breathing patterns. The study confirmed that the delivered dose and drug delivery efficiency were reduced in the child model compared to those in the adult model and in the asthma pattern compared to those in the normal breathing pattern.

Results: The NE-SM1 NEPLUS vibrating mesh nebulizer demonstrated the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the loading dose, whereas the PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT (breath-enhanced) jet nebulizer had the highest delivery efficiency when calculated as a percentage of the emitted dose.

Conclusion: The results suggest that the total inspiration volume, output rate, and particle size should be considered when IgG nebulization is used. We, therefore, propose a method for evaluating the efficiency of nebulizer for predicting antibody drug delivery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不同气道模型和呼吸方式下通过雾化器给药抗体效率的评价。
背景:雾化器常用于治疗呼吸系统疾病,这是发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虽然抗体吸入疗法已在临床前研究和临床试验中对呼吸系统疾病进行了评估,但尚未批准用于治疗。此外,关于治疗性抗体通过雾化器的输送效率的信息有限。方法:比较2种气道模型、5种呼吸方式下5种雾化器给药免疫球蛋白G (IgG)的雾化特性和给药效率。研究证实,与成人模型相比,儿童模型的给药剂量和给药效率有所降低,哮喘模式与正常呼吸模式相比,给药剂量和给药效率有所降低。结果:NE-SM1 NEPLUS振动网状雾化器的给药效率最高,以负载剂量的百分比计算,而PARI BOY SX + LC SPRINT(呼吸增强)喷射雾化器的给药效率最高,以发射剂量的百分比计算。结论:IgG雾化时应考虑总吸入量、输出速率和颗粒大小。因此,我们提出了一种评估雾化器预测抗体药物递送效率的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
期刊最新文献
Sodium Houttuyniae attenuates ferroptosis by regulating TRAF6-c-Myc signaling pathways in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury (ALI). The subchronic toxicity of higher olefins in Han Wistar rats. Appropriate use of triazolam in elderly patients considering a quantitative benefit-risk assessment based on the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation approach supported by real-world data. Comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of oral ferrous succinate tablets and intravenous iron sucrose: a retrospective study. Drug-induced liver injury associated with atypical generation antipsychotics from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1