The development of a method for the global health community to assess the proportion of food and beverage companies' sales that are derived from unhealthy foods.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Globalization and Health Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1186/s12992-023-00992-z
Lauren Bandy, Jo Jewell, Madison Luick, Mike Rayner, Yuan Li, Katherine Shats, Susan Jebb, Suying Chang, Elizabeth Dunford
{"title":"The development of a method for the global health community to assess the proportion of food and beverage companies' sales that are derived from unhealthy foods.","authors":"Lauren Bandy, Jo Jewell, Madison Luick, Mike Rayner, Yuan Li, Katherine Shats, Susan Jebb, Suying Chang, Elizabeth Dunford","doi":"10.1186/s12992-023-00992-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Corporate engagement with food and beverage companies who produce food associated with health harms is a divisive topic in the global nutrition community, with high-profile cases of conflict of interest increasingly coming under scrutiny. There is a need for an agreed method to support health organizations in deciding whether and how to engage with large food and beverage manufacturers.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop a method to quantify the proportion of sales from food and beverage companies that are derived from unhealthy foods to support organizations in determining which companies might be considered high-risk for engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 2015 WHO Euro nutrient profile model was applied to 35,550 products from 1294 brands manufactured by the top 20 global food and beverage companies from seven countries (Australia, Brazil, China, India, South Africa, UK and USA). For the purpose of this study, products that met the WHO Euro criteria were classified as \"healthier\" and those that failed were classified as \"unhealthy\". Products were grouped by brand and weighted by the brand's value sales for 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of each company's sales that were classified as unhealthy and healthier by company and category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 89% of the top 20 companies' brand sales were classified as unhealthy. For every USD$10 spent on the top 20 companies' brands, only $1.10 was spent on products considered healthier. All companies saw the majority of their sales come from unhealthy foods, including soft drinks, confectionery and snacks. None of Red Bull or Ferrero's sales were classified as healthier and less than 5% of total sales were healthier for Mondelēz, Mars, and PepsiCo. Some companies had higher proportions of sales deriving from healthier products, including Grupo Bimbo (48%), Danone (34%) and Conagra (32%), although the majority of their sales were still derived from unhealthy foods.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results presented in this study highlight the reliance the leading food and beverage companies have on sales of unhealthy products that are contributing to diet-related disease globally. The method and steps we have laid out here could be used by organizations in the global health community to identify companies that have conflicts of interest when it comes to engaging with governments, international organizations and public health bodies on issues of policy and regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-00992-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Corporate engagement with food and beverage companies who produce food associated with health harms is a divisive topic in the global nutrition community, with high-profile cases of conflict of interest increasingly coming under scrutiny. There is a need for an agreed method to support health organizations in deciding whether and how to engage with large food and beverage manufacturers.

Aim: The aim of this study was to develop a method to quantify the proportion of sales from food and beverage companies that are derived from unhealthy foods to support organizations in determining which companies might be considered high-risk for engagement.

Methods: The 2015 WHO Euro nutrient profile model was applied to 35,550 products from 1294 brands manufactured by the top 20 global food and beverage companies from seven countries (Australia, Brazil, China, India, South Africa, UK and USA). For the purpose of this study, products that met the WHO Euro criteria were classified as "healthier" and those that failed were classified as "unhealthy". Products were grouped by brand and weighted by the brand's value sales for 2020. The primary outcome was the proportion of each company's sales that were classified as unhealthy and healthier by company and category.

Results: Overall, 89% of the top 20 companies' brand sales were classified as unhealthy. For every USD$10 spent on the top 20 companies' brands, only $1.10 was spent on products considered healthier. All companies saw the majority of their sales come from unhealthy foods, including soft drinks, confectionery and snacks. None of Red Bull or Ferrero's sales were classified as healthier and less than 5% of total sales were healthier for Mondelēz, Mars, and PepsiCo. Some companies had higher proportions of sales deriving from healthier products, including Grupo Bimbo (48%), Danone (34%) and Conagra (32%), although the majority of their sales were still derived from unhealthy foods.

Discussion: The results presented in this study highlight the reliance the leading food and beverage companies have on sales of unhealthy products that are contributing to diet-related disease globally. The method and steps we have laid out here could be used by organizations in the global health community to identify companies that have conflicts of interest when it comes to engaging with governments, international organizations and public health bodies on issues of policy and regulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定一种方法,供全球卫生界评估食品和饮料公司来自不健康食品的销售比例。
背景:企业与生产有害健康食品的食品和饮料公司的合作在全球营养界是一个有争议的话题,越来越多引人注目的利益冲突案件受到审查。需要一种商定的方法来支持卫生组织决定是否以及如何与大型食品和饮料制造商合作。目的:本研究的目的是开发一种方法来量化来自不健康食品的食品和饮料公司的销售比例,以支持组织确定哪些公司可能被认为是高风险的参与。方法:采用2015年世卫组织欧洲营养概况模型,对来自澳大利亚、巴西、中国、印度、南非、英国和美国等7个国家的全球前20大食品饮料公司生产的1294个品牌的35,550种产品进行分析。为了本研究的目的,符合世卫组织欧洲标准的产品被归类为“更健康”,不符合标准的产品被归类为“不健康”。产品按品牌分组,并按2020年品牌价值销售额加权。主要结果是每个公司的销售按公司和类别划分为不健康和健康的比例。结果:总体而言,前20家公司中有89%的品牌销售被列为不健康。在排名前20的公司品牌上每花费10美元,只有1.10美元花在被认为更健康的产品上。所有公司的大部分销售额都来自不健康食品,包括软饮料、糖果和零食。红牛(Red Bull)和费列罗(Ferrero)的销售额都不属于健康食品,Mondelēz、玛氏(Mars)和百事可乐(PepsiCo)的健康食品销售额不到总销售额的5%。一些公司来自健康产品的销售比例较高,包括宾宝集团(48%)、达能(34%)和康尼格拉(32%),尽管它们的大部分销售仍然来自不健康食品。讨论:本研究的结果强调了主要食品和饮料公司对不健康产品销售的依赖,这些不健康产品正在导致全球饮食相关疾病。我们在此提出的方法和步骤可供全球卫生界各组织使用,以确定在与政府、国际组织和公共卫生机构就政策和法规问题进行接触时存在利益冲突的公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of violence while in insecure migration status: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Impacts of economic sanctions on population health and health system: a study at national and sub-national levels from 2000 to 2020 in Iran. Schools of public health as a cornerstone for pandemic preparedness and response: the Africa COVID-19 experience. "Games being played": a US exploration of market strategies used by the beverage industry as experienced by food retailers. Harnessing genomic technologies for one health solutions in the tropics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1