The impact of conspiracy beliefs on a targeted group: Perceived popularity of Jewish-targeted conspiracy beliefs elicits outgroup avoidant behaviours

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2023-12-03 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12690
Daniel Jolley, Jenny L. Paterson, Andrew McNeill
{"title":"The impact of conspiracy beliefs on a targeted group: Perceived popularity of Jewish-targeted conspiracy beliefs elicits outgroup avoidant behaviours","authors":"Daniel Jolley,&nbsp;Jenny L. Paterson,&nbsp;Andrew McNeill","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In three studies with Jewish participants, we explored the consequences of intergroup conspiracy theories on those targeted. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 250), perceived Jewish conspiracy theory popularity was positively associated with intergroup threat and negatively associated with the closeness of contact with non-Jewish people. Study 2 (<i>n</i> = 194) employed an experimental design where Jewish participants were exposed to the idea that many (vs. few) non-Jewish people believe in Jewish conspiracy theories. A path model demonstrated that exposure to the many (vs. few) manipulation increased intergroup threat, which was then positively associated with emotional reactions. Intergroup anxiety and ingroup anger were then positively associated with avoidance, whilst ingroup anxiety was positively associated with approach tendencies. Study 3 (<i>n</i> = 201) used the same experimental design, and a path model revealed that conspiracy popularity increased intergroup threat, which, in turn, was positively associated with ingroup anger and anxiety. Ingroup anxiety was then associated with intentions to help ingroup members. Notably, conspiracy popularity rendered participants less likely to interact with a non-Jewish partner in a behavioural task. Our work provides evidence that conspiracy beliefs, especially when perceived to be widely held, are likely to significantly impact targeted ingroup members.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjop.12690","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In three studies with Jewish participants, we explored the consequences of intergroup conspiracy theories on those targeted. In Study 1 (N = 250), perceived Jewish conspiracy theory popularity was positively associated with intergroup threat and negatively associated with the closeness of contact with non-Jewish people. Study 2 (n = 194) employed an experimental design where Jewish participants were exposed to the idea that many (vs. few) non-Jewish people believe in Jewish conspiracy theories. A path model demonstrated that exposure to the many (vs. few) manipulation increased intergroup threat, which was then positively associated with emotional reactions. Intergroup anxiety and ingroup anger were then positively associated with avoidance, whilst ingroup anxiety was positively associated with approach tendencies. Study 3 (n = 201) used the same experimental design, and a path model revealed that conspiracy popularity increased intergroup threat, which, in turn, was positively associated with ingroup anger and anxiety. Ingroup anxiety was then associated with intentions to help ingroup members. Notably, conspiracy popularity rendered participants less likely to interact with a non-Jewish partner in a behavioural task. Our work provides evidence that conspiracy beliefs, especially when perceived to be widely held, are likely to significantly impact targeted ingroup members.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴谋信念对目标群体的影响:对犹太人的阴谋信念的感知普及引发了外群体回避行为。
在三个以犹太人为参与者的研究中,我们探讨了群体间阴谋论对目标人群的影响。在研究1 (N = 250)中,犹太人阴谋论的受欢迎程度与群体间威胁呈正相关,与与非犹太人接触的亲密度呈负相关。研究2 (n = 194)采用了一种实验设计,让犹太参与者了解到许多(相对于少数)非犹太人相信犹太人的阴谋论。路径模型表明,暴露于许多(相对较少)操纵增加了群体间威胁,然后与情绪反应呈正相关。群体间焦虑和群体内愤怒与回避呈正相关,而群体内焦虑与接近倾向呈正相关。研究3 (n = 201)采用相同的实验设计,路径模型显示,阴谋受欢迎程度增加了群体间威胁,而群体间威胁反过来又与群体内愤怒和焦虑呈正相关。然后,内群体焦虑与帮助内群体成员的意图有关。值得注意的是,阴谋论的受欢迎程度使参与者在行为任务中不太可能与非犹太伙伴互动。我们的工作提供了证据,证明阴谋信念,尤其是被广泛持有的阴谋信念,可能会对群体内的目标成员产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking interplays between competitiveness, cooperativeness, and social comparison orientation: A network psychometric approach and replication Positive and negative touch differentially modulate metacognitive memory judgements for emotional stimuli People have different expectations for their own versus others' use of AI-mediated communication tools. Social sharing of emotion during the collective crisis of COVID-19. Mirroring brains: How we understand others from the inside By GiacomoRizzolatti, CorradoSinigaglia. Translated by Frances Andersen, New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 2023. Hardcover US$ 46.99. ISBN: 9780198871705
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1