Patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy for major depressive disorder: an observational study.

IF 4.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863
Espen R Lassen, Susanne Aabel Lia, Ingrid Hjertaas, Odin Hjemdal, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Roger Hagen, Stian Solem
{"title":"Patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy for major depressive disorder: an observational study.","authors":"Espen R Lassen, Susanne Aabel Lia, Ingrid Hjertaas, Odin Hjemdal, Leif Edward Ottesen Kennair, Roger Hagen, Stian Solem","doi":"10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this observational study was to examine the predictive and discriminant validity of patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy (MCT) for depression. Motivational development for recovered- and non-recovered patients was also investigated. Motivation in sessions 1, 4, and 7 was measured using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5 (MISC) in a 10-session trial of MCT for depression (<i>N =</i> 37). Adherence was assessed with the CBT compliance measure in session 7. The Beck Depression Inventory measured treatment outcome at 3-year follow-up. Recovered patients developed significantly more <i>change talk</i> and <i>taking steps</i>, and less <i>sustain talk</i>, as therapy progressed, compared to non-recovered patients. Evidence of the predictive validity of motivation in sessions 1 and 4 was limited. Higher <i>sustain talk</i> and <i>taking steps</i> in session 7 were significant predictors of more and less depressive symptoms, respectively. There was a moderate-strong correlation between motivation and adherence. The results confirm the predictive value of MISC in sessions 7 of MCT for depression, and establish differential motivational development between recovered and non-recovered patients. Subsequent research should clarify the discriminant validity and temporal relationships between motivation, adherence, and other clinical variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":10535,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"220-234"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16506073.2023.2289863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this observational study was to examine the predictive and discriminant validity of patient motivation and adherence in metacognitive therapy (MCT) for depression. Motivational development for recovered- and non-recovered patients was also investigated. Motivation in sessions 1, 4, and 7 was measured using the Motivational Interviewing Skill Code 2.5 (MISC) in a 10-session trial of MCT for depression (N = 37). Adherence was assessed with the CBT compliance measure in session 7. The Beck Depression Inventory measured treatment outcome at 3-year follow-up. Recovered patients developed significantly more change talk and taking steps, and less sustain talk, as therapy progressed, compared to non-recovered patients. Evidence of the predictive validity of motivation in sessions 1 and 4 was limited. Higher sustain talk and taking steps in session 7 were significant predictors of more and less depressive symptoms, respectively. There was a moderate-strong correlation between motivation and adherence. The results confirm the predictive value of MISC in sessions 7 of MCT for depression, and establish differential motivational development between recovered and non-recovered patients. Subsequent research should clarify the discriminant validity and temporal relationships between motivation, adherence, and other clinical variables.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重度抑郁症元认知治疗的患者动机和依从性:一项观察性研究。
本观察性研究的目的是检验抑郁症元认知治疗(MCT)中患者动机和依从性的预测和判别有效性。对康复和未康复患者的动机发展也进行了调查。第1、4和7阶段的动机是使用动机性访谈技能代码2.5 (MISC)在10期MCT治疗抑郁症的试验中测量的(N = 37)。在第7期使用CBT依从性措施评估依从性。贝克抑郁量表在3年随访中测量治疗结果。与未康复的患者相比,随着治疗的进展,康复的患者明显有更多的改变谈话和采取措施,而更少的持续谈话。第1和第4阶段动机预测有效性的证据是有限的。较高的持续谈话和在第7阶段采取措施分别是更多和更少抑郁症状的显著预测因子。动机和依从性之间有中强的相关性。结果证实了MCT第7期中MISC对抑郁症的预测价值,并建立了康复和未康复患者之间动机发展的差异。后续研究应阐明动机、依从性和其他临床变量之间的区别效度和时间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the application of behavioural and cognitive sciences to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The journal publishes state-of-the-art scientific articles within: - clinical and health psychology - psychopathology - behavioural medicine - assessment - treatment - theoretical issues pertinent to behavioural, cognitive and combined cognitive behavioural therapies With the number of high quality contributions increasing, the journal has been able to maintain a rapid publication schedule, providing readers with the latest research in the field.
期刊最新文献
The psychometric properties of the Mini Social Phobia Inventory in a treatment seeking sample of children and their caregivers. A concentrated approach for treating OCD: a pilot study examining the feasibility and potential effectiveness of the Bergen Four Day Treatment in the U.S. Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Questionnaire on Well-Being: a validation study for a clinically informed measurement of subjective well-being. Understanding change from the patient perspective in a transdiagnostic Internet-based intervention for emotional disorders: a qualitative content analysis. Correction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1