Different doses of imeglimin for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17446651.2023.2290488
Hikmat Permana, Nanny Natalia Mulyani Soetedjo, Theo Audi Yanto, Marshell Tendean, Timotius Ivan Hariyanto, Ketut Suastika
{"title":"Different doses of imeglimin for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Hikmat Permana, Nanny Natalia Mulyani Soetedjo, Theo Audi Yanto, Marshell Tendean, Timotius Ivan Hariyanto, Ketut Suastika","doi":"10.1080/17446651.2023.2290488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A new medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) called imeglimin can target all three organs involved in the pathogenesis of DM, namely the liver, skeletal muscles, and pancreas. This research seeks to examine the most efficacious and safe dose of imeglimin for the management of T2DM.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using particular keywords, we searched the CENTRAL, Medline, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for pertinent literature. The results of continuous variables were pooled into the mean difference (MD) and dichotomous variables into odds ratio (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using fixed-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our pooled analysis revealed that imeglimin 1000 mg twice daily [MD -0.90% <i>p</i> < 0.00001] and 1500 mg twice daily [MD -0.84% <i>p</i> = 0.0003] as monotherapy was associated with a higher reduction in the HbA<sub>1c</sub> compared to placebo. This superiority was still maintained when given as combination therapy. Regrettably, there was an observed escalation in gastrointestinal AEs as the dosage of imeglimin was raised, despite the absence of a corresponding improvement in its efficacy in decreasing HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that imeglimin 1000 mg twice daily may offer the most optimum therapeutic effects for glycemic control without compromising its safety profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":12107,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446651.2023.2290488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A new medication for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) called imeglimin can target all three organs involved in the pathogenesis of DM, namely the liver, skeletal muscles, and pancreas. This research seeks to examine the most efficacious and safe dose of imeglimin for the management of T2DM.

Research design and methods: Using particular keywords, we searched the CENTRAL, Medline, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for pertinent literature. The results of continuous variables were pooled into the mean difference (MD) and dichotomous variables into odds ratio (OR) along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using fixed-effect models.

Results: Our pooled analysis revealed that imeglimin 1000 mg twice daily [MD -0.90% p < 0.00001] and 1500 mg twice daily [MD -0.84% p = 0.0003] as monotherapy was associated with a higher reduction in the HbA1c compared to placebo. This superiority was still maintained when given as combination therapy. Regrettably, there was an observed escalation in gastrointestinal AEs as the dosage of imeglimin was raised, despite the absence of a corresponding improvement in its efficacy in decreasing HbA1c levels.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that imeglimin 1000 mg twice daily may offer the most optimum therapeutic effects for glycemic control without compromising its safety profiles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同剂量的依米明治疗2型糖尿病:随机临床试验的系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归
背景:一种治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的新药物伊米明可以靶向糖尿病发病机制中涉及的所有三个器官,即肝脏、骨骼肌和胰腺。本研究旨在探讨治疗2型糖尿病最有效和最安全的伊米明剂量。研究设计和方法:使用特定的关键词,我们在CENTRAL、Medline、Scopus和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中检索相关文献。使用固定效应模型将连续变量的结果合并为平均差(MD),将二分类变量的结果合并为优势比(OR)及其95%置信区间(95% CI)。结果:我们的汇总分析显示,与安慰剂相比,单药治疗伊米明1000 mg,每日2次[MD -0.90% p = 0.0003]与HbA1c的降低相关。当联合治疗时,这种优势仍然保持。令人遗憾的是,胃肠道不良事件随着伊米明剂量的增加而增加,尽管其降低HbA1c水平的效果没有相应的改善。结论:我们的研究表明,每日两次,每次1000mg的伊米明可能在不影响其安全性的情况下提供最佳的血糖控制治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism
Expert Review of Endocrinology & Metabolism ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Implicated in a plethora of regulatory dysfunctions involving growth and development, metabolism, electrolyte balances and reproduction, endocrine disruption is one of the highest priority research topics in the world. As a result, we are now in a position to better detect, characterize and overcome the damage mediated by adverse interaction with the endocrine system. Expert Review of Endocrinology and Metabolism (ISSN 1744-6651), provides extensive coverage of state-of-the-art research and clinical advancements in the field of endocrine control and metabolism, with a focus on screening, prevention, diagnostics, existing and novel therapeutics, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Predicting hypoglycemia in ICU patients: a machine learning approach. The utility of a machine learning model in identifying people at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Is there a target value for time in tight range for individuals with type 1 diabetes on MDI? Data from masked CGM. Tirzepatide: unveiling a new dawn in dual-targeted diabetes and obesity management. Progress in managing children with achondroplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1