Patients' Experience of Specialty Care Coordination: Survey Development and Validation.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2023-11-27 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2027
Varsha G Vimalananda, Mark Meterko, Kailyn E Sitter, Shirley Qian, Jolie B Wormwood, B Graeme Fincke
{"title":"Patients' Experience of Specialty Care Coordination: Survey Development and Validation.","authors":"Varsha G Vimalananda, Mark Meterko, Kailyn E Sitter, Shirley Qian, Jolie B Wormwood, B Graeme Fincke","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Specialty care coordination relies on information flowing bidirectionally between all three participants in the \"specialty care triad\" - patients, primary care providers (PCPs), and specialists. Measures of coordination should strive to account for the perspectives of each. As we previously developed two surveys to measure coordination of specialty care as experienced by PCPs and specialists, this study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a related survey of specialty care coordination as experienced by the patient, thereby completing the suite of surveys among the triad.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a draft survey based on literature review, patient interviews, adaptation of existing measures, and development of new items. Survey responses were collected via mail and online in two waves, August 2019-November 2019 and September 2020-May 2021, among patients (N=939) receiving medical specialty care and primary care in the Veterans Affairs health system. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess scale structure. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship of the final coordination scales to patients' overall experience of specialty care coordination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A 38-item measure representing 10 factors that assess the patient's experience of coordination in specialty care among the patient, PCP, and specialist was finalized. Scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and, together, explained 59% of the variance in overall coordination. Analyses revealed an unexpected construct describing organization of care between patient and specialist that accounted for patient goals and preferences; this 10-item scale was named Patient-Centered Care Coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The final survey, Coordination of Specialty Care - Patient, or CSC-Patient for short, is a reliable instrument that can be used alone or with its companions (CSC-PCP, CSC-Specialist) to provide a detailed assessment of specialty care coordination and identify targets for coordination improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10688916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Specialty care coordination relies on information flowing bidirectionally between all three participants in the "specialty care triad" - patients, primary care providers (PCPs), and specialists. Measures of coordination should strive to account for the perspectives of each. As we previously developed two surveys to measure coordination of specialty care as experienced by PCPs and specialists, this study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a related survey of specialty care coordination as experienced by the patient, thereby completing the suite of surveys among the triad.

Methods: We developed a draft survey based on literature review, patient interviews, adaptation of existing measures, and development of new items. Survey responses were collected via mail and online in two waves, August 2019-November 2019 and September 2020-May 2021, among patients (N=939) receiving medical specialty care and primary care in the Veterans Affairs health system. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess scale structure. Multiple linear regression was used to examine the relationship of the final coordination scales to patients' overall experience of specialty care coordination.

Results: A 38-item measure representing 10 factors that assess the patient's experience of coordination in specialty care among the patient, PCP, and specialist was finalized. Scales demonstrated good internal consistency reliability and, together, explained 59% of the variance in overall coordination. Analyses revealed an unexpected construct describing organization of care between patient and specialist that accounted for patient goals and preferences; this 10-item scale was named Patient-Centered Care Coordination.

Conclusions: The final survey, Coordination of Specialty Care - Patient, or CSC-Patient for short, is a reliable instrument that can be used alone or with its companions (CSC-PCP, CSC-Specialist) to provide a detailed assessment of specialty care coordination and identify targets for coordination improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专科护理协调患者经验:调查发展与验证。
目的:专科护理协调依赖于“专科护理三合一”中所有三个参与者——患者、初级保健提供者(pcp)和专家之间的双向信息流动。协调措施应努力考虑到各方的观点。正如我们之前开发了两项调查来测量pcp和专科医生经历的专科护理协调,本研究旨在开发和评估患者经历的专科护理协调相关调查的心理测量特性,从而完成三合一调查套件。方法:我们在文献回顾、患者访谈、现有措施的调整和新项目开发的基础上制定了一份调查草案。通过邮件和在线收集调查反馈,分为2019年8月至2019年11月和2020年9月至2021年5月两波,在退伍军人事务卫生系统接受医学专科护理和初级保健的患者(N=939)中收集。采用探索性和验证性因子分析评估量表结构。采用多元线性回归检验最终协调量表与患者专科护理协调总体体验的关系。结果:38项测量代表10个因素,评估患者的经验,协调专科护理之间的病人,PCP和专家最终确定。量表显示出良好的内部一致性可靠性,并共同解释了59%的总体协调方差。分析揭示了一种意想不到的结构,描述了患者和专家之间的护理组织,说明了患者的目标和偏好;这个10项量表被命名为“以病人为中心的护理协调”。结论:最后的调查,专业护理-患者的协调,或简称csc -患者,是一个可靠的工具,可以单独使用或与它的同伴(CSC-PCP, CSC-Specialist)提供一个详细的评估专业护理协调和确定协调改进的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bringing Virtual Reality to Mainstream Pediatric Care Recognizing 30 Years of Accomplishments and Envisioning an Innovative Future - The 2024 Annual Conference of the Health Care Systems Research Network Abstracts From the 2024 Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Cruising Speed: Our Journal's 10-Year Voyage Factors Associated With Increased Health Care Utilization for Patients With Dementia With Lewy Bodies: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1