{"title":"Impact of telephone follow-up on hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving oral chemotherapy from an ambulatory-care setting.","authors":"Yukio Sakata, Hisanaga Nomura, Hirofumi Nakajima, Tomomi Kitajima, Yukiko Ito, Yoshiya Yamamoto","doi":"10.1177/10781552231215427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, most molecular target drugs have been administered orally, as prescribed at ambulatory services in hospitals and at patients' homes. Telephone follow-up is increasingly being used in clinical practice for patients needing additional support post-discharge and for the prevention of hospital readmissions. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical benefits of telephone follow-up while administering oral anticancer drugs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study. We evaluated hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received sorafenib or lenvatinib between March 2010 and February 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the total of 130 patients, 83 patients received telephone follow-up and 47 did not. The incidence of hand-foot skin reactions significantly reduced in patients with telephone follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 3.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-11.8, <i>p</i> = 0.020). The median durations (ranges) of adherence to oral chemotherapy were 259 days (15-1730) for the telephone follow-up group and 121 days (14-1105) for the no-telephone follow-up group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Moreover, the disease control rate was significantly higher in the telephone follow-up group (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15-5.53, <i>p</i> = 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Remote interventions, such as telephone follow-up, are useful means of managing adverse events in patients receiving oral anticancer drugs and can lead to improved treatment results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1378-1384"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231215427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, most molecular target drugs have been administered orally, as prescribed at ambulatory services in hospitals and at patients' homes. Telephone follow-up is increasingly being used in clinical practice for patients needing additional support post-discharge and for the prevention of hospital readmissions. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical benefits of telephone follow-up while administering oral anticancer drugs.
Methods: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study. We evaluated hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received sorafenib or lenvatinib between March 2010 and February 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events.
Results: From the total of 130 patients, 83 patients received telephone follow-up and 47 did not. The incidence of hand-foot skin reactions significantly reduced in patients with telephone follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 3.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-11.8, p = 0.020). The median durations (ranges) of adherence to oral chemotherapy were 259 days (15-1730) for the telephone follow-up group and 121 days (14-1105) for the no-telephone follow-up group (p < 0.001). Moreover, the disease control rate was significantly higher in the telephone follow-up group (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.15-5.53, p = 0.020).
Conclusions: Remote interventions, such as telephone follow-up, are useful means of managing adverse events in patients receiving oral anticancer drugs and can lead to improved treatment results.
近年来,大多数分子靶向药物都是口服的,作为医院和患者家中门诊服务的处方。在临床实践中,电话随访越来越多地用于出院后需要额外支持的患者和预防再入院。本研究的目的是阐明在口服抗癌药物的同时进行电话随访的临床益处。方法:本研究为单中心、观察性、回顾性研究。我们评估了2010年3月至2018年2月期间接受索拉非尼或lenvatinib治疗的肝细胞癌患者。主要终点是不良事件的发生率。结果:130例患者中,83例接受电话随访,47例未接受电话随访。电话随访患者的手足皮肤反应发生率显著降低(优势比(OR) 3.69, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.16-11.8, p = 0.020)。电话随访组口服化疗坚持的中位持续时间(范围)为259天(15-1730),非电话随访组为121天(14-1105)(p p = 0.020)。结论:远程干预,如电话随访,是管理口服抗癌药物患者不良事件的有效手段,可以改善治疗效果。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...