Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda III Category on Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy.

IF 0.6 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-29 DOI:10.15605/jafes.038.02.19
Jennifer Lourdes Ng, Luz Margaret Escueta, Oliver Allan Dampil
{"title":"Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda III Category on Repeat Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy.","authors":"Jennifer Lourdes Ng, Luz Margaret Escueta, Oliver Allan Dampil","doi":"10.15605/jafes.038.02.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy for nodules repeatedly classified as Bethesda category III on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A chart review on a series of 59 patients seen with thyroid nodules who underwent both initial and repeat FNAB at the Diabetes, Thyroid and Endocrine Center of St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City was conducted. The Thyroid Registry was utilized to collect each patient's demographic and clinical characteristics, ultrasonographic features of thyroid nodules along with the cytopathologic and histopathologic results. The subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) were retrieved from the cytopathology reports using the institution's electronic Healthcare-Results Management System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 adult patients with thyroid nodules were included. Nodules which were initially AUS/FLUS turned out to be malignant on repeat FNAB in 38 patients with a prevalence of 64.41% (95% CI: 50.87-76.45%). There was no significant difference with regards to clinical, ultrasonographic and cytopathologic features of malignancy between benign and malignant nodules.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings of this study support surgical intervention as a reasonable option after a repeat Bethesda III classification on FNAB. However, the small sample size warrants confirmation in future studies with a representative sample of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":41792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies","volume":"38 2","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10692425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15605/jafes.038.02.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of malignancy for nodules repeatedly classified as Bethesda category III on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).

Methodology: A chart review on a series of 59 patients seen with thyroid nodules who underwent both initial and repeat FNAB at the Diabetes, Thyroid and Endocrine Center of St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City was conducted. The Thyroid Registry was utilized to collect each patient's demographic and clinical characteristics, ultrasonographic features of thyroid nodules along with the cytopathologic and histopathologic results. The subclassification of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) were retrieved from the cytopathology reports using the institution's electronic Healthcare-Results Management System.

Results: A total of 59 adult patients with thyroid nodules were included. Nodules which were initially AUS/FLUS turned out to be malignant on repeat FNAB in 38 patients with a prevalence of 64.41% (95% CI: 50.87-76.45%). There was no significant difference with regards to clinical, ultrasonographic and cytopathologic features of malignancy between benign and malignant nodules.

Conclusion: Findings of this study support surgical intervention as a reasonable option after a repeat Bethesda III classification on FNAB. However, the small sample size warrants confirmation in future studies with a representative sample of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恶性甲状腺结节Bethesda III类重复细针穿刺活检。
目的:本研究旨在评估细针穿刺活检(FNAB)反复归类为Bethesda III类结节的恶性风险。方法:对在奎松市圣卢克医疗中心糖尿病、甲状腺和内分泌中心接受首次和重复FNAB治疗的59例甲状腺结节患者进行了图表回顾。利用甲状腺登记处收集每位患者的人口统计学和临床特征,甲状腺结节的超声特征以及细胞病理学和组织病理学结果。使用该机构的电子医疗保健结果管理系统从细胞病理学报告中检索不确定意义的非典型性/不确定意义的滤泡性病变(AUS/FLUS)的亚分类。结果:共纳入59例成年甲状腺结节患者。38例患者的重复FNAB检查显示,最初为AUS/流感的结节为恶性结节,患病率为64.41% (95% CI: 50.87-76.45%)。良、恶性结节的临床、超声及细胞病理特征均无明显差异。结论:本研究结果支持手术干预是FNAB重复Bethesda III分型后的合理选择。然而,小样本量值得在未来有代表性的患者样本的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies (JAFES) is an OPEN ACCESS, internationally peer-reviewed, English language, medical and health science journal that is published in print two times a year by the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies. It shall serve as the endocrine window between the ASEAN region and the world, featuring original papers and publishing key findings from specialists and experts of endocrinology.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Insulin and C-peptide Secretion Ratios During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test to Diagnose Insulinoma. Age and Sex-related Chromogranin A Gene Polymorphisms and its Association with Metabolic Syndrome Components. Characteristics and Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome Among Adult Filipinos with Hypothyroidism: A Cross-sectional Study. Deceptive Brown Adipose Tissue. Diagnostic Accuracy of American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting Data System: A Single-center Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1