Board talk: How members of executive hospital boards influence the positioning of nursing in crisis through talk.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1111/nin.12618
Arjan Verhoeven, Henri Marres, Erik van de Loo, Pieterbas Lalleman
{"title":"Board talk: How members of executive hospital boards influence the positioning of nursing in crisis through talk.","authors":"Arjan Verhoeven, Henri Marres, Erik van de Loo, Pieterbas Lalleman","doi":"10.1111/nin.12618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Talk by members of executive hospital boards influences the organizational positioning of nurses. Talk is a relational leadership practice. Using a qualitative-interpretive design we organized focus group meetings wherein members of executive hospital boards (7), nurses (14), physicians (7), and managers (6), from 15 Dutch hospitals, discussed the organizational positioning of nursing during COVID crisis. We found that members of executive hospital boards consider the positioning of nursing in crisis a task of nurses themselves and not as a collective, interdependent, and/or specific board responsibility. Furthermore, members of executive hospital boards talk about the nursing profession as (1) more practical than strategic, (2) ambiguous in positioning, and (3) distinctive from the medical profession. Such talk seemingly contrasts with the notion of interdependence that highlights how actors depend on each other in interaction. Interdependence is central to collaboration in hospital crises. In this paper, therefore, we depart from the members of executive hospital boards as leader and \"positioner,\" and focus on talk-as a discursive leadership practice-to illuminate leadership and governance in hospitals in crisis, as social, interdependent processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"e12618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12618","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Talk by members of executive hospital boards influences the organizational positioning of nurses. Talk is a relational leadership practice. Using a qualitative-interpretive design we organized focus group meetings wherein members of executive hospital boards (7), nurses (14), physicians (7), and managers (6), from 15 Dutch hospitals, discussed the organizational positioning of nursing during COVID crisis. We found that members of executive hospital boards consider the positioning of nursing in crisis a task of nurses themselves and not as a collective, interdependent, and/or specific board responsibility. Furthermore, members of executive hospital boards talk about the nursing profession as (1) more practical than strategic, (2) ambiguous in positioning, and (3) distinctive from the medical profession. Such talk seemingly contrasts with the notion of interdependence that highlights how actors depend on each other in interaction. Interdependence is central to collaboration in hospital crises. In this paper, therefore, we depart from the members of executive hospital boards as leader and "positioner," and focus on talk-as a discursive leadership practice-to illuminate leadership and governance in hospitals in crisis, as social, interdependent processes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会谈话:执行医院董事会成员如何通过谈话影响危机护理的定位。
执行医院董事会成员的谈话影响护士的组织定位。谈话是一种关系型领导实践。采用定性解释设计,我们组织了焦点小组会议,其中来自荷兰15家医院的执行医院董事会成员(7人)、护士(14人)、医生(7人)和管理人员(6人)讨论了COVID危机期间护理的组织定位。我们发现,执行医院董事会的成员认为,危机护理的定位是护士自己的任务,而不是集体的、相互依存的和/或具体的董事会责任。此外,执行医院董事会的成员认为护理专业(1)实用性大于战略性,(2)定位模糊,(3)与医学专业不同。这种说法似乎与强调演员在互动中如何相互依赖的相互依赖的概念形成了鲜明对比。相互依赖是医院危机合作的核心。因此,在本文中,我们不再把医院执行董事会成员作为领导者和“定位者”,而是把重点放在谈话上——作为一种话语式的领导实践——来阐明处于危机中的医院的领导和治理,作为社会的、相互依存的过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
期刊最新文献
Nurses' Advocacy in Intensive Care: What Insights Can Nurses' Experiences During the Pandemic Reveal? On Skin, Monsters and Boundaries: What The Silence of the Lambs can Teach Nurses About Abjection. The Everyday Phenomenology of Bedside Insight: A Response to Shira Birnbaum. Thinking Theoretically in Nursing Research-Positionality and Reflexivity in an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) Study. Health Professionals on Cross-Sectoral Collaboration Between Mental Health Hospitals and Municipalities: A Critical Discourse Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1