Bayesian dose escalation with overdose and underdose control utilizing all toxicities in Phase I/II clinical trials

IF 1.8 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Biometrical Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1002/bimj.202200189
Jieqi Tu, Zhengjia Chen
{"title":"Bayesian dose escalation with overdose and underdose control utilizing all toxicities in Phase I/II clinical trials","authors":"Jieqi Tu,&nbsp;Zhengjia Chen","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202200189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Escalation with overdose control (EWOC) is a commonly used Bayesian adaptive design, which controls overdosing risk while estimating maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in cancer Phase I clinical trials. In 2010, Chen and his colleagues proposed a novel toxicity scoring system to fully utilize patients’ toxicity information by using a normalized equivalent toxicity score (NETS) in the range 0 to 1 instead of a binary indicator of dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Later in 2015, by adding underdosing control into EWOC, escalation with overdose and underdose control (EWOUC) design was proposed to guarantee patients the minimum therapeutic effect of drug in Phase I/II clinical trials. In this paper, the EWOUC-NETS design is developed by integrating the advantages of EWOUC and NETS in a Bayesian context. Moreover, both toxicity response and efficacy are treated as continuous variables to maximize trial efficiency. The dose escalation decision is based on the posterior distribution of both toxicity and efficacy outcomes, which are recursively updated with accumulated data. We compare the operation characteristics of EWOUC-NETS and existing methods through simulation studies under five scenarios. The study results show that EWOUC-NETS design treating toxicity and efficacy outcomes as continuous variables can increase accuracy in identifying the optimized utility dose (OUD) and provide better therapeutic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202200189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Escalation with overdose control (EWOC) is a commonly used Bayesian adaptive design, which controls overdosing risk while estimating maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in cancer Phase I clinical trials. In 2010, Chen and his colleagues proposed a novel toxicity scoring system to fully utilize patients’ toxicity information by using a normalized equivalent toxicity score (NETS) in the range 0 to 1 instead of a binary indicator of dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Later in 2015, by adding underdosing control into EWOC, escalation with overdose and underdose control (EWOUC) design was proposed to guarantee patients the minimum therapeutic effect of drug in Phase I/II clinical trials. In this paper, the EWOUC-NETS design is developed by integrating the advantages of EWOUC and NETS in a Bayesian context. Moreover, both toxicity response and efficacy are treated as continuous variables to maximize trial efficiency. The dose escalation decision is based on the posterior distribution of both toxicity and efficacy outcomes, which are recursively updated with accumulated data. We compare the operation characteristics of EWOUC-NETS and existing methods through simulation studies under five scenarios. The study results show that EWOUC-NETS design treating toxicity and efficacy outcomes as continuous variables can increase accuracy in identifying the optimized utility dose (OUD) and provide better therapeutic effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在I/II期临床试验中,贝叶斯剂量递增与剂量过量和剂量不足控制。
递增与过量控制(EWOC)是一种常用的贝叶斯自适应设计,在癌症I期临床试验中,它在估计最大耐受剂量(MTD)的同时控制过量风险。2010年,Chen和他的同事提出了一种新的毒性评分系统,通过使用0到1范围内的标准化等效毒性评分(NETS)来代替剂量限制毒性(DLT)的二元指标,充分利用患者的毒性信息。2015年,在EWOC中加入剂量不足控制,提出了以过量和剂量不足控制递增(EWOUC)设计,以保证患者在I/II期临床试验中获得最小的药物治疗效果。本文在贝叶斯环境下,结合EWOUC和NETS的优点,开发了EWOUC-NETS设计。此外,毒性反应和疗效均被视为连续变量,以最大限度地提高试验效率。剂量递增的决定是基于毒性和疗效结果的后验分布,并根据累积的数据递归更新。通过五种场景下的仿真研究,比较了EWOUC-NETS与现有方法的运行特性。研究结果表明,EWOUC-NETS设计将毒性和疗效结果作为连续变量,可以提高确定最佳实用剂量(OUD)的准确性,提供更好的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
期刊最新文献
Bivariate Quantile Residual Life Functions for Estimating Immunological and Virological Recovery in HIV Patients. Expectile Regression for Censored Data Based on Data Augmentation. Generalizing the Finkelstein-Schoenfeld Test to Incorporate Multiple Alternating Thresholds. Testing for Sufficient Follow-Up in Survival Data With a Cure Fraction. Impact of Treatment Effect Heterogeneity on the Estimation of Individualized Treatment Rules for Count Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1