Bridging the socioeconomic gap in E-waste: Evidence from aggregate data across 27 European Union countries

V. Nikou, E. Sardianou
{"title":"Bridging the socioeconomic gap in E-waste: Evidence from aggregate data across 27 European Union countries","authors":"V. Nikou,&nbsp;E. Sardianou","doi":"10.1016/j.clpl.2023.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The responsible handling of e-waste has become a critical worldwide concern since, as it is essential for both environmental protection and human health because. This is because it prevents the release of harmful chemicals and reduces the ecological impact associated with the electronic waste disposal. Despite efforts the e-waste collection remains low due to a variety of reasons, including inadequate collection systems and socio-economic disparities. The present study aims to investigate the socioeconomic determinants affecting the level of e-waste in a sample of 27 EU countries for the period 2005–2020. The empirical analysis contributes to the existing literature by estimating the short- and long-term relationship between e-waste collection and corruption, income inequalities, imperfect gas market structures and labor market conditions. For this purpose, the study employs panel data techniques and cointegration analysis. The findings robustly suggest that countries with higher levels of socio-economic justice tend to exhibit higher e-waste collection levels, while the concentration of market share among a few dominant natural gas companies decreases collection levels. Low e-waste collection is also associated with concentrated income in the hands of a few individuals in both the short-and long-run. By advocating for equitable resource allocation and establishing a supportive environment, we can encourage increased levels of e-waste collection. Encouraging gas market entries and discouraging anti-competitive practices through regulatory frameworks is also crucial. Strategies to reduce wealth disparities and promote income equality involve implementing progressive taxation systems, redistributive policies, and inclusive economic development initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100255,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Production Letters","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000258/pdfft?md5=113b65a3bc74e3b4dad6877d64be77e8&pid=1-s2.0-S2666791623000258-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Production Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666791623000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The responsible handling of e-waste has become a critical worldwide concern since, as it is essential for both environmental protection and human health because. This is because it prevents the release of harmful chemicals and reduces the ecological impact associated with the electronic waste disposal. Despite efforts the e-waste collection remains low due to a variety of reasons, including inadequate collection systems and socio-economic disparities. The present study aims to investigate the socioeconomic determinants affecting the level of e-waste in a sample of 27 EU countries for the period 2005–2020. The empirical analysis contributes to the existing literature by estimating the short- and long-term relationship between e-waste collection and corruption, income inequalities, imperfect gas market structures and labor market conditions. For this purpose, the study employs panel data techniques and cointegration analysis. The findings robustly suggest that countries with higher levels of socio-economic justice tend to exhibit higher e-waste collection levels, while the concentration of market share among a few dominant natural gas companies decreases collection levels. Low e-waste collection is also associated with concentrated income in the hands of a few individuals in both the short-and long-run. By advocating for equitable resource allocation and establishing a supportive environment, we can encourage increased levels of e-waste collection. Encouraging gas market entries and discouraging anti-competitive practices through regulatory frameworks is also crucial. Strategies to reduce wealth disparities and promote income equality involve implementing progressive taxation systems, redistributive policies, and inclusive economic development initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥合电子垃圾的社会经济差距:来自27个欧盟国家汇总数据的证据
负责任地处理电子废物已成为全球关注的一个关键问题,因为它对环境保护和人类健康都至关重要,因为。这是因为它可以防止有害化学物质的释放,并减少与电子废物处理相关的生态影响。尽管做出了努力,但由于各种原因,包括收集系统不完善和社会经济差距,电子垃圾收集仍然很低。本研究旨在调查影响2005-2020年27个欧盟国家样本中电子垃圾水平的社会经济决定因素。实证分析通过估计电子垃圾收集与腐败、收入不平等、不完善的天然气市场结构和劳动力市场状况之间的短期和长期关系,对现有文献做出了贡献。为此,本研究采用面板数据技术和协整分析。研究结果有力地表明,社会经济正义水平较高的国家往往表现出更高的电子垃圾收集水平,而市场份额集中在少数占主导地位的天然气公司中则降低了收集水平。从短期和长期来看,低电子废物收集也与少数人手中的集中收入有关。通过倡导公平的资源分配和建立一个支持性的环境,我们可以鼓励增加电子废物的收集水平。鼓励天然气市场进入并通过监管框架打击反竞争行为也至关重要。减少财富差距和促进收入平等的战略包括实施累进税制、再分配政策和包容性经济发展倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incorporating creative problem-solving skills to foster sustainability among graduate students in education management Advancing product service systems - Life cycle assessment: Robust method for sustainability assessment A framework for product development based on recycled plastic from pesticide packaging: A study of short supply chains from the perspective of circular economy Emerging trends of environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure research A comprehensive analysis of sustainable fertilizer-related publications within the context of circular economy: Insights from the field of business management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1