A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of applied behavior analysis Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1002/jaba.1045
Nathan A. Call, Alec M. Bernstein, Matthew J. O'Brien, Kelly M. Schieltz, Loukia Tsami, Dorothea C. Lerman, Wendy K. Berg, Scott D. Lindgren, Mark A. Connelly, David P. Wacker
{"title":"A comparative effectiveness trial of functional behavioral assessment methods","authors":"Nathan A. Call,&nbsp;Alec M. Bernstein,&nbsp;Matthew J. O'Brien,&nbsp;Kelly M. Schieltz,&nbsp;Loukia Tsami,&nbsp;Dorothea C. Lerman,&nbsp;Wendy K. Berg,&nbsp;Scott D. Lindgren,&nbsp;Mark A. Connelly,&nbsp;David P. Wacker","doi":"10.1002/jaba.1045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clinicians report primarily using functional behavioral assessment (FBA) methods that do not include functional analyses. However, studies examining the correspondence between functional analyses and other types of FBAs have produced inconsistent results. In addition, although functional analyses are considered the gold standard, their contribution toward successful treatment compared with other FBA methods remains unclear. This comparative effectiveness study, conducted with 57 young children with autism spectrum disorder, evaluated the results of FBAs that did (<i>n</i> = 26) and did not (<i>n</i> = 31) include a functional analysis. Results of FBAs with and without functional analyses showed modest correspondence. All participants who completed functional communication training achieved successful outcomes regardless of the type of FBA conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 1","pages":"166-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinicians report primarily using functional behavioral assessment (FBA) methods that do not include functional analyses. However, studies examining the correspondence between functional analyses and other types of FBAs have produced inconsistent results. In addition, although functional analyses are considered the gold standard, their contribution toward successful treatment compared with other FBA methods remains unclear. This comparative effectiveness study, conducted with 57 young children with autism spectrum disorder, evaluated the results of FBAs that did (n = 26) and did not (n = 31) include a functional analysis. Results of FBAs with and without functional analyses showed modest correspondence. All participants who completed functional communication training achieved successful outcomes regardless of the type of FBA conducted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能行为评估方法的比较效果试验。
临床医生报告主要使用功能行为评估(FBA)方法,不包括功能分析。然而,检查功能分析与其他类型FBAs之间的对应关系的研究产生了不一致的结果。此外,虽然功能分析被认为是金标准,但与其他FBA方法相比,它们对成功治疗的贡献尚不清楚。这项比较有效性的研究,对57名患有自闭症谱系障碍的幼儿进行了研究,评估了有(n = 26)和没有(n = 31)功能分析的FBAs的结果。有功能分析和没有功能分析的FBAs结果显示适度的对应。无论进行何种类型的FBA,所有完成功能性沟通培训的参与者都取得了成功的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the social acceptability of the Re-Connect concept: A smartphone-based, nonfinancial, contingency management intervention. Contingency management for monosubstance use disorders: Systematic review and assessment of predicted versus obtained effects. Choice versus no choice: Practical considerations for increasing choices. Functional analysis and treatment of problem behavior by domesticated canines. Effects of social interaction on leisure item preference and reinforcer efficacy for children with autism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1