Verifying the Equivalence of Hawthorn Leaves Standard Decoction and Formula Granules by LC-MS and Oxidative Stress Test.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1093/chromsci/bmad089
Ling-Di Wang, Jing-Yun Gao, Li-Ying Duan, Hai-Feng Pan
{"title":"Verifying the Equivalence of Hawthorn Leaves Standard Decoction and Formula Granules by LC-MS and Oxidative Stress Test.","authors":"Ling-Di Wang, Jing-Yun Gao, Li-Ying Duan, Hai-Feng Pan","doi":"10.1093/chromsci/bmad089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify the equivalence of hawthorn leaves standard decoction and formula granules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this experiment, liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer (LC-MS) was used to examine the chemical composition of hawthorn leaves standard decoction and formula granules, separately. In addition, oxidative stress test was used to explore the antioxidant capacity of them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>71 chemical components were identified by LC-MS. Among them, 64 and 56 compounds were identified in the standard decoction and formula granules, respectively. There were a total of 49 common components, with no significant difference in content. Oxidative stress test showed that hawthorn leaves standard decoction and formula granules had no obvious toxicity to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Compared with the model group, the same dose of hawthorn leaves formula granule and standard decoction could inhibit the secretion of lactate dehydrogenase and malondialdehyde (P < 0.05), and increase the content of superoxide dismutase (P < 0.01), with no statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no significant difference in the main active ingredients between the standard decoction and the formula granules, and the antioxidant activity in vitro is equivalent, providing an important theoretical basis for the further development of hawthorn leaves formula granules.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmad089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To verify the equivalence of hawthorn leaves standard decoction and formula granules.

Methods: In this experiment, liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer (LC-MS) was used to examine the chemical composition of hawthorn leaves standard decoction and formula granules, separately. In addition, oxidative stress test was used to explore the antioxidant capacity of them.

Results: 71 chemical components were identified by LC-MS. Among them, 64 and 56 compounds were identified in the standard decoction and formula granules, respectively. There were a total of 49 common components, with no significant difference in content. Oxidative stress test showed that hawthorn leaves standard decoction and formula granules had no obvious toxicity to human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Compared with the model group, the same dose of hawthorn leaves formula granule and standard decoction could inhibit the secretion of lactate dehydrogenase and malondialdehyde (P < 0.05), and increase the content of superoxide dismutase (P < 0.01), with no statistically significant difference.

Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the main active ingredients between the standard decoction and the formula granules, and the antioxidant activity in vitro is equivalent, providing an important theoretical basis for the further development of hawthorn leaves formula granules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用LC-MS和氧化应激试验验证山楂叶标准汤和配方颗粒的等效性。
目的:验证山楂叶标准汤剂与配方颗粒的等效性。方法:采用液相色谱-质谱联用技术,分别对山楂叶标准汤剂和配方颗粒进行化学成分分析。此外,通过氧化应激试验探讨了它们的抗氧化能力。结果:经LC-MS鉴别出71种化学成分。其中,在标准汤剂和配方颗粒中分别鉴定出64种和56种化合物。共有49种成分,在含量上无显著差异。氧化应激试验表明,山楂叶标准汤和配方颗粒对人脐静脉内皮细胞无明显毒性作用。与模型组比较,相同剂量山楂叶配方颗粒与标准汤剂均能抑制小鼠乳酸脱氢酶和丙二醛的分泌(P)。结论:标准汤剂与配方颗粒的主要有效成分无显著差异,体外抗氧化活性相当,为山楂叶配方颗粒的进一步开发提供了重要的理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Mentorship in academic musculoskeletal radiology: perspectives from a junior faculty member. Underlying synovial sarcoma undiagnosed for more than 20 years in a patient with regional pain: a case report. Sacrococcygeal chordoma with spontaneous regression due to a large hemorrhagic component. Associations of cumulative voriconazole dose, treatment duration, and alkaline phosphatase with voriconazole-induced periostitis. Can the presence of SLAP-5 lesions be predicted by using the critical shoulder angle in traumatic anterior shoulder instability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1