Diagnostic Accuracy of the World Health Organization Pediatric Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment Tool Plus Among Patients Seeking Care in Nairobi, Kenya: A Cross-sectional Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003093
Josephine Chen, Adam R Aluisio, Oliver Y Tang, Uzoma A Nwakibu, Katherine M Hunold, Ali Akida Wangara, Jason Kiruja, Alice Maingi, Vincent Mutiso, Peyton Thompson, Benjamin Wachira, Stephen J Dunlop, Ian B K Martin, Justin G Myers
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of the World Health Organization Pediatric Emergency Triage, Assessment and Treatment Tool Plus Among Patients Seeking Care in Nairobi, Kenya: A Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Josephine Chen, Adam R Aluisio, Oliver Y Tang, Uzoma A Nwakibu, Katherine M Hunold, Ali Akida Wangara, Jason Kiruja, Alice Maingi, Vincent Mutiso, Peyton Thompson, Benjamin Wachira, Stephen J Dunlop, Ian B K Martin, Justin G Myers","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization developed Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment Plus (ETAT+) guidelines to facilitate pediatric care in resource-limited settings. ETAT+ triages patients as nonurgent, priority, or emergency cases, but there is limited research on the performance of ETAT+ regarding patient-oriented outcomes. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of ETAT+ in predicting the need for hospital admission in a pediatric emergency unit at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of pediatric emergency unit patients enrolled over a 4-week period using fixed random sampling. Diagnostic accuracy of ETAT+ was evaluated using receiver operating curves (ROCs) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with associated sensitivity and specificity (reference category: nonurgent). The ROC analysis was performed for the overall population and stratified by age group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 323 patients were studied. The most common reasons for presentation were upper respiratory tract disease (32.8%), gastrointestinal disease (15.5%), and lower respiratory tract disease (12.4%). Two hundred twelve participants were triaged as nonurgent (65.6%), 60 as priority (18.6%), and 51 as emergency (15.8%). In the overall study population, the area under the ROC curve was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99). The ETAT+ sensitivity was 93.8% (95% CI, 87.0%-99.0%), and the specificity was 82.0% (95% CI, 77.0%-87.0%) for admission of priority group patients. The sensitivity and specificity for the emergency patients were 66.0% (95% CI, 55.0%-77.0%) and 98.0% (95% CI, 97.0%-100.0%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ETAT+ demonstrated diagnostic accuracy for predicting patient need for hospital admission. This finding supports the utility of ETAT+ to inform emergency care practice. Further research on ETAT+ performance in larger populations and additional patient-oriented outcomes would enhance its generalizability and application in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003093","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The World Health Organization developed Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment Plus (ETAT+) guidelines to facilitate pediatric care in resource-limited settings. ETAT+ triages patients as nonurgent, priority, or emergency cases, but there is limited research on the performance of ETAT+ regarding patient-oriented outcomes. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of ETAT+ in predicting the need for hospital admission in a pediatric emergency unit at Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi, Kenya.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of pediatric emergency unit patients enrolled over a 4-week period using fixed random sampling. Diagnostic accuracy of ETAT+ was evaluated using receiver operating curves (ROCs) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with associated sensitivity and specificity (reference category: nonurgent). The ROC analysis was performed for the overall population and stratified by age group.

Results: A total of 323 patients were studied. The most common reasons for presentation were upper respiratory tract disease (32.8%), gastrointestinal disease (15.5%), and lower respiratory tract disease (12.4%). Two hundred twelve participants were triaged as nonurgent (65.6%), 60 as priority (18.6%), and 51 as emergency (15.8%). In the overall study population, the area under the ROC curve was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99). The ETAT+ sensitivity was 93.8% (95% CI, 87.0%-99.0%), and the specificity was 82.0% (95% CI, 77.0%-87.0%) for admission of priority group patients. The sensitivity and specificity for the emergency patients were 66.0% (95% CI, 55.0%-77.0%) and 98.0% (95% CI, 97.0%-100.0%), respectively.

Conclusions: ETAT+ demonstrated diagnostic accuracy for predicting patient need for hospital admission. This finding supports the utility of ETAT+ to inform emergency care practice. Further research on ETAT+ performance in larger populations and additional patient-oriented outcomes would enhance its generalizability and application in resource-limited settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在肯尼亚内罗毕寻求治疗的患者中,世界卫生组织儿科急诊分诊、评估和治疗工具Plus的诊断准确性:一项横断面研究。
简介:世界卫生组织制定了紧急分诊评估和治疗附加(ETAT+)指南,以促进资源有限环境下的儿科护理。ETAT+将患者分为非紧急、优先或紧急病例,但关于ETAT+在以患者为导向的结果方面的表现的研究有限。本研究评估了ETAT+在预测肯尼亚内罗毕肯雅塔国家医院儿科急诊科住院需求方面的诊断准确性。方法:这是一项针对儿科急诊科患者的横断面研究的二次分析,采用固定随机抽样,为期4周。使用受试者工作曲线(roc)和相应的95%置信区间(ci)以及相关的敏感性和特异性(参考类别:非紧急)评估ETAT+的诊断准确性。ROC分析对总体人群进行,并按年龄组分层。结果:共纳入323例患者。最常见的原因是上呼吸道疾病(32.8%)、胃肠道疾病(15.5%)和下呼吸道疾病(12.4%)。212名参与者被分类为非紧急(65.6%),60名为优先(18.6%),51名为紧急(15.8%)。在整个研究人群中,ROC曲线下面积为0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99)。入院优先组患者的ETAT+敏感性为93.8% (95% CI, 87.0% ~ 99.0%),特异性为82.0% (95% CI, 77.0% ~ 87.0%)。对急诊患者的敏感性和特异性分别为66.0% (95% CI, 55.0% ~ 77.0%)和98.0% (95% CI, 97.0% ~ 100.0%)。结论:ETAT+在预测患者住院需求方面具有准确性。这一发现支持了ETAT+为急诊护理实践提供信息的效用。进一步研究ETAT+在更大人群中的表现和更多以患者为导向的结果,将增强其在资源有限环境中的推广和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Impact of Race on Addressing Intimate Partner Violence in the Emergency Department. Ultrasound Imaging of Various Ingested Foreign Bodies in an Ex Vivo Intestinal Model. Risk of Urinary Tract Infection and Bacteremia in Infants Infected With COVID-19. The Effect of Step Stool Use on Chest Compression Quality During CPR in Young Children: Findings From the Videography in Pediatric Emergency Research (VIPER) Collaborative. Pediatric Off-Road Vehicle Injuries: Side-by-Sides Worse for the Upper Extremity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1