A Systematic Review of Interventions for Obesity Among Adults With Food Insecurity.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000001028
Randy Bach, Anna Hui, Ariana M Chao
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Interventions for Obesity Among Adults With Food Insecurity.","authors":"Randy Bach, Anna Hui, Ariana M Chao","doi":"10.1097/JCN.0000000000001028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Food insecurity is associated with reduced dietary quality and excess weight gain. However, interventions that are effective for obesity among individuals with food insecurity are unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize studies in which authors examined interventions for obesity among adults with food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies were included if their authors reported on nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions that focused on adults with food insecurity and overweight/obesity and reported weight loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1360 titles were reviewed during the electronic search, and only 5 studies met inclusion criteria. There were 2 primary types of interventions that have been tested: first, behavioral weight loss counseling with or without tailoring for individuals with food insecurity and, second, subsidies for food. Findings of the benefits of one type of intervention over another are mixed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review highlights that the current evidence for interventions that address food insecurity and obesity is mixed and limited in scope. There is a need for rigorous controlled trials to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for weight management among individuals with food insecurity and obesity while considering sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"E46-E56"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000001028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Food insecurity is associated with reduced dietary quality and excess weight gain. However, interventions that are effective for obesity among individuals with food insecurity are unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize studies in which authors examined interventions for obesity among adults with food insecurity.

Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from inception to October 2022. Studies were included if their authors reported on nonpharmacological and nonsurgical interventions that focused on adults with food insecurity and overweight/obesity and reported weight loss.

Results: A total of 1360 titles were reviewed during the electronic search, and only 5 studies met inclusion criteria. There were 2 primary types of interventions that have been tested: first, behavioral weight loss counseling with or without tailoring for individuals with food insecurity and, second, subsidies for food. Findings of the benefits of one type of intervention over another are mixed.

Conclusions: This systematic review highlights that the current evidence for interventions that address food insecurity and obesity is mixed and limited in scope. There is a need for rigorous controlled trials to examine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions for weight management among individuals with food insecurity and obesity while considering sustainability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品不安全成人肥胖干预措施的系统综述。
目的:粮食不安全与饮食质量下降和体重增加有关。然而,对粮食不安全人群的肥胖有效的干预措施尚不清楚。本系统综述的目的是综合作者对食品不安全成人肥胖干预措施的研究。方法:检索PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL和EMBASE数据库,检索时间为建站至2022年10月。如果研究的作者报告的是非药物和非手术干预措施的重点是食品不安全和超重/肥胖的成年人,并报告体重减轻,则纳入研究。结果:电子检索共检索到1360篇文献,仅有5篇文献符合纳入标准。已经测试过的干预措施主要有两种:第一种是针对食物不安全的个人,提供或不提供量身定制的行为减肥咨询;第二种是食物补贴。一种干预方式对另一种干预方式的益处的研究结果好坏参半。结论:本系统综述强调,目前关于解决粮食不安全和肥胖问题的干预措施的证据参差不齐,而且范围有限。有必要进行严格的对照试验,在考虑可持续性的同时,检验粮食不安全和肥胖人群体重管理干预措施的有效性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Official journal of the Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing is one of the leading journals for advanced practice nurses in cardiovascular care, providing thorough coverage of timely topics and information that is extremely practical for daily, on-the-job use. Each issue addresses the physiologic, psychologic, and social needs of cardiovascular patients and their families in a variety of environments. Regular columns include By the Bedside, Progress in Prevention, Pharmacology, Dysrhythmias, and Outcomes Research.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Hand Reflexology Massage on Pain and Anxiety After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Cardiovascular Health Behavior Prediction Model in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Sensitivity and Specificity of Pulse Oximetry for Identification of Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review. Dignity, Resilience, and Quality of Life in Patients With Cardiac Disease: A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Diet Quality Mediates the Relationship Between Chronic Stress and Inflammation in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1