A Review of the Categorizations of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Bacterial Keratitis Ulcers and Day-1 Treatment Regimen When Using the Topical Fluoroquinolones 0.3% Ciprofloxacin and 0.3% Ofloxacin

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100729
John Graham Pearce PhD , Ozge Sarac MD , Ted Maddess PhD
{"title":"A Review of the Categorizations of Mild, Moderate, and Severe Bacterial Keratitis Ulcers and Day-1 Treatment Regimen When Using the Topical Fluoroquinolones 0.3% Ciprofloxacin and 0.3% Ofloxacin","authors":"John Graham Pearce PhD ,&nbsp;Ozge Sarac MD ,&nbsp;Ted Maddess PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are published suggestions that bacterial keratitis (BK) can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe and that the day-1 antibiotic drop regimen may differ for each category using the topical second-generation fluoroquinolones 0.3% ciprofloxacin and 0.3% ofloxacin (2FQ). The classification criteria are not consistently defined and the suggested regimens are often unreferenced and so here, the evidence base for applying such regimens in clinical practice is examined.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine the evidence base regarding the categorization criteria used for BK and determine whether any evidence exists to support suggestions that different day-1 treatment regimen using the 2FQ may be applied based on any assigned categorization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The literature on BK treatment was reviewed, as were the clinical studies involving the commercially available 2FQ. All statements pertaining to classification and treatment paradigms involving BK were then collated and reviewed, as were the methodologies employed in the 2FQ clinical studies.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There have been no clinical trials using the 2FQ, or indeed any other topical antibiotics, which have used different day-1 drop regimen depending on the size, depth, and location of the ulcer or for ulcers classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Thus, there is no evidence to support the suggestion that a lower number of drops on day 1 is as effective as a higher number on categorized BK ulcers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No standardized method of categorizing BK was found, and there is no evidence to support the contention that mild, moderate, or smaller BK ulcers should be treated any differently to larger or severe ulcers on day 1. The manufacturers of 2FQ do not supply different treatment regimens for different ulcer sizes and severity categories. When using the 2FQ, all BK ulcers should be treated equally in line with the manufacturers’ recommended day-1 treatment regimen.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10920,"journal":{"name":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 100729"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X23000383/pdfft?md5=1edc409139e75389d761d6f97ccff393&pid=1-s2.0-S0011393X23000383-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Therapeutic Research-clinical and Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011393X23000383","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are published suggestions that bacterial keratitis (BK) can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe and that the day-1 antibiotic drop regimen may differ for each category using the topical second-generation fluoroquinolones 0.3% ciprofloxacin and 0.3% ofloxacin (2FQ). The classification criteria are not consistently defined and the suggested regimens are often unreferenced and so here, the evidence base for applying such regimens in clinical practice is examined.

Objective

To examine the evidence base regarding the categorization criteria used for BK and determine whether any evidence exists to support suggestions that different day-1 treatment regimen using the 2FQ may be applied based on any assigned categorization.

Methods

The literature on BK treatment was reviewed, as were the clinical studies involving the commercially available 2FQ. All statements pertaining to classification and treatment paradigms involving BK were then collated and reviewed, as were the methodologies employed in the 2FQ clinical studies.

Results

There have been no clinical trials using the 2FQ, or indeed any other topical antibiotics, which have used different day-1 drop regimen depending on the size, depth, and location of the ulcer or for ulcers classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Thus, there is no evidence to support the suggestion that a lower number of drops on day 1 is as effective as a higher number on categorized BK ulcers.

Conclusions

No standardized method of categorizing BK was found, and there is no evidence to support the contention that mild, moderate, or smaller BK ulcers should be treated any differently to larger or severe ulcers on day 1. The manufacturers of 2FQ do not supply different treatment regimens for different ulcer sizes and severity categories. When using the 2FQ, all BK ulcers should be treated equally in line with the manufacturers’ recommended day-1 treatment regimen.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度、中度和重度细菌性角膜炎溃疡的分类及局部使用氟喹诺酮类药物0.3%环丙沙星和0.3%氧氟沙星第1天治疗方案的综述
已有研究表明细菌性角膜炎(BK)可分为轻度、中度或重度,并且第1天的抗生素滴药方案可能因不同类别而不同,局部使用第二代氟喹诺酮类药物0.3%环丙沙星和0.3%氧氟沙星(2FQ)。分类标准没有一致的定义,建议的方案往往没有参考,因此在这里,在临床实践中应用这些方案的证据基础进行了检查。目的检查BK分类标准的证据基础,确定是否有证据支持根据任何指定的分类采用不同的第1天治疗方案使用2FQ。方法回顾有关BK治疗的文献,以及市售2FQ的临床研究。所有涉及BK的分类和治疗范例的陈述,以及在2FQ临床研究中使用的方法,随后被整理和审查。结果:目前尚无临床试验使用2FQ或任何其他局部抗生素,根据溃疡的大小、深度和位置或轻度、中度或重度溃疡使用不同的第1天滴药方案。因此,没有证据支持这样的建议,即第1天较少的滴剂数量与较多的滴剂数量对分类BK溃疡同样有效。结论:没有发现标准化的BK分类方法,也没有证据支持轻度、中度或较小的BK溃疡在第1天应与较大或严重溃疡区别对待的观点。2FQ的制造商不针对不同的溃疡大小和严重程度类别提供不同的治疗方案。使用2FQ时,所有BK溃疡应按照制造商推荐的第1天治疗方案进行平等治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: We also encourage the submission of manuscripts presenting preclinical and very preliminary research that may stimulate further investigation of potentially relevant findings, as well as in-depth review articles on specific therapies or disease states, and applied health delivery or pharmacoeconomics. CTR encourages and supports the submission of manuscripts describing: • Interventions designed to understand or improve human health, disease treatment or disease prevention; • Studies that focus on problems that are uncommon in resource-rich countries; • Research that is "under-published" because of limited access to monetary resources such as English language support and Open Access fees (CTR offers deeply discounted English language editing); • Republication of articles previously published in non-English journals (eg, evidence-based guidelines) which could be useful if translated into English; • Preclinical and clinical product development studies that are not pursued for further investigation based upon early phase results.
期刊最新文献
Inhibitory effects of heat-killed lactic acid bacterium Enterococcus faecalis on the growth of Porphyromonas gingivalis Potentially Inappropriate Medications Use and Associated Factors Among Older Patients on Follow-Up at the Chronic Care Clinic of Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Eastern Ethiopia A Narrative Review of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Response in the Kingdom of Bahrain Effects of Low-Dose Glucagon on Subcutaneous Insulin Absorption in Pigs Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy of Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Rosuvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia and Hypertension: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1