Inter-institutional analysis of the outcome after postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal of Artificial Organs Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1177/03913988231214934
Fausto Biancari, Timo Mäkikallio, Antonio Loforte, Alexander Kaserer, Vito G Ruggieri, Sung-Min Cho, Jin Kook Kang, Magnus Dalén, Henryk Welp, Kristján Jónsson, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Francisco J Hernández Pérez, Giuseppe Gatti, Khalid Alkhamees, Antonio Fiore, Andrea Lechiancole, Stefano Rosato, Cristiano Spadaccio, Matteo Pettinari, Andrea Perrotti, Sebastian D Sahli, Camilla L'Acqua, Amr A Arafat, Monirah A Albabtain, Mohammed M AlBarak, Mohamed Laimoud, Ilija Djordjevic, Ihor Krasivskyi, Robertas Samalavicius, Agne Jankuviene, Marta Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta, Markus J Wilhelm, Tatu Juvonen, Giovanni Mariscalco
{"title":"Inter-institutional analysis of the outcome after postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Fausto Biancari, Timo Mäkikallio, Antonio Loforte, Alexander Kaserer, Vito G Ruggieri, Sung-Min Cho, Jin Kook Kang, Magnus Dalén, Henryk Welp, Kristján Jónsson, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Francisco J Hernández Pérez, Giuseppe Gatti, Khalid Alkhamees, Antonio Fiore, Andrea Lechiancole, Stefano Rosato, Cristiano Spadaccio, Matteo Pettinari, Andrea Perrotti, Sebastian D Sahli, Camilla L'Acqua, Amr A Arafat, Monirah A Albabtain, Mohammed M AlBarak, Mohamed Laimoud, Ilija Djordjevic, Ihor Krasivskyi, Robertas Samalavicius, Agne Jankuviene, Marta Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta, Markus J Wilhelm, Tatu Juvonen, Giovanni Mariscalco","doi":"10.1177/03913988231214934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients requiring postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A-ECMO) have a high risk of early mortality. In this analysis, we evaluated whether any interinstitutional difference exists in the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies on postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO were identified through a systematic review for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analysis of interinstitutional results was performed using direct standardization, estimation of observed/expected in-hospital mortality ratio and propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systematic review of the literature yielded 31 studies. Data from 10 studies on 1269 patients treated at 25 hospitals were available for the present analysis. In-hospital mortality was 66.7%. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in six hospitals. Observed versus expected in-hospital mortality ratio showed that four hospitals were outliers with significantly increased mortality rates, and one hospital had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate. Participating hospitals were classified as underperforming and overperforming hospitals if their observed/expected in-hospital mortality was higher or lower than 1.0, respectively. Among 395 propensity score matched pairs, the overperforming hospitals had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (60.3% vs 71.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) than underperforming hospitals. Low annual volume of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO tended to be predictive of poor outcome only when adjusted for patients' risk profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-hospital mortality after postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO differed significantly between participating hospitals. These findings suggest that in many centers there is room for improvement of the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231214934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients requiring postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A-ECMO) have a high risk of early mortality. In this analysis, we evaluated whether any interinstitutional difference exists in the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.

Methods: Studies on postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO were identified through a systematic review for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analysis of interinstitutional results was performed using direct standardization, estimation of observed/expected in-hospital mortality ratio and propensity score matching.

Results: Systematic review of the literature yielded 31 studies. Data from 10 studies on 1269 patients treated at 25 hospitals were available for the present analysis. In-hospital mortality was 66.7%. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in six hospitals. Observed versus expected in-hospital mortality ratio showed that four hospitals were outliers with significantly increased mortality rates, and one hospital had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate. Participating hospitals were classified as underperforming and overperforming hospitals if their observed/expected in-hospital mortality was higher or lower than 1.0, respectively. Among 395 propensity score matched pairs, the overperforming hospitals had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (60.3% vs 71.4%, p = 0.001) than underperforming hospitals. Low annual volume of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO tended to be predictive of poor outcome only when adjusted for patients' risk profile.

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality after postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO differed significantly between participating hospitals. These findings suggest that in many centers there is room for improvement of the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌梗死术后静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合术后疗效的机构间分析。
简介需要进行心肌切开术后静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(V-A-ECMO)的患者早期死亡的风险很高。在这项分析中,我们评估了心肌切开术后 V-A-ECMO 的结果是否存在机构间差异:方法:通过对患者个体数据(IPD)荟萃分析的系统性回顾,确定了有关心肌切开术后 V-A-ECMO 的研究。采用直接标准化、估计观察/预期院内死亡率和倾向评分匹配等方法对机构间结果进行分析:结果:对文献进行系统回顾后得出了 31 项研究结果。本分析可获得 10 项研究的数据,这些数据涉及 25 家医院治疗的 1269 名患者。院内死亡率为 66.7%。六家医院的院内死亡率相对风险明显更高。观察到的院内死亡率与预期的院内死亡率之比显示,有四家医院属于异常值,死亡率明显升高,一家医院的院内死亡率明显降低。如果参与医院的观察/预期院内死亡率分别高于或低于 1.0,则将其分为表现不佳医院和表现不佳医院。在 395 对倾向得分匹配的医院中,表现优异的医院的院内死亡率(60.3% vs 71.4%,p = 0.001)明显低于表现不佳的医院。只有在对患者的风险状况进行调整后,心肌梗死术后V-A-ECMO的年手术量低才有可能预测不良预后:结论:参与研究的医院之间在心肌梗死术后V-A-ECMO的院内死亡率方面存在显著差异。这些研究结果表明,在许多中心,开胸术后V-A-ECMO的效果还有待提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
期刊最新文献
Performance study of dual heart assisted control system based on SL-SMC physiological combination controller. Depurative capacity toward medium molecules of the dialyzer Toray NV-U® Hydrolink™: A new hydrophilic membrane to perform online hemodiafiltration. Assessment of haemolysis models for a positive-displacement total artificial heart. Dynamic VAD simulations: Performing accurate simulations of ventricular assist devices in interaction with the cardiovascular system. Flexible inner surface of polysulfone membranes prevents platelet adhesive protein adsorption and improves antithrombogenicity in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1