Inter-institutional analysis of the outcome after postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal of Artificial Organs Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1177/03913988231214934
Fausto Biancari, Timo Mäkikallio, Antonio Loforte, Alexander Kaserer, Vito G Ruggieri, Sung-Min Cho, Jin Kook Kang, Magnus Dalén, Henryk Welp, Kristján Jónsson, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Francisco J Hernández Pérez, Giuseppe Gatti, Khalid Alkhamees, Antonio Fiore, Andrea Lechiancole, Stefano Rosato, Cristiano Spadaccio, Matteo Pettinari, Andrea Perrotti, Sebastian D Sahli, Camilla L'Acqua, Amr A Arafat, Monirah A Albabtain, Mohammed M AlBarak, Mohamed Laimoud, Ilija Djordjevic, Ihor Krasivskyi, Robertas Samalavicius, Agne Jankuviene, Marta Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta, Markus J Wilhelm, Tatu Juvonen, Giovanni Mariscalco
{"title":"Inter-institutional analysis of the outcome after postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Fausto Biancari, Timo Mäkikallio, Antonio Loforte, Alexander Kaserer, Vito G Ruggieri, Sung-Min Cho, Jin Kook Kang, Magnus Dalén, Henryk Welp, Kristján Jónsson, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Francisco J Hernández Pérez, Giuseppe Gatti, Khalid Alkhamees, Antonio Fiore, Andrea Lechiancole, Stefano Rosato, Cristiano Spadaccio, Matteo Pettinari, Andrea Perrotti, Sebastian D Sahli, Camilla L'Acqua, Amr A Arafat, Monirah A Albabtain, Mohammed M AlBarak, Mohamed Laimoud, Ilija Djordjevic, Ihor Krasivskyi, Robertas Samalavicius, Agne Jankuviene, Marta Alonso-Fernandez-Gatta, Markus J Wilhelm, Tatu Juvonen, Giovanni Mariscalco","doi":"10.1177/03913988231214934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients requiring postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A-ECMO) have a high risk of early mortality. In this analysis, we evaluated whether any interinstitutional difference exists in the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies on postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO were identified through a systematic review for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analysis of interinstitutional results was performed using direct standardization, estimation of observed/expected in-hospital mortality ratio and propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systematic review of the literature yielded 31 studies. Data from 10 studies on 1269 patients treated at 25 hospitals were available for the present analysis. In-hospital mortality was 66.7%. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in six hospitals. Observed versus expected in-hospital mortality ratio showed that four hospitals were outliers with significantly increased mortality rates, and one hospital had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate. Participating hospitals were classified as underperforming and overperforming hospitals if their observed/expected in-hospital mortality was higher or lower than 1.0, respectively. Among 395 propensity score matched pairs, the overperforming hospitals had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (60.3% vs 71.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.001) than underperforming hospitals. Low annual volume of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO tended to be predictive of poor outcome only when adjusted for patients' risk profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In-hospital mortality after postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO differed significantly between participating hospitals. These findings suggest that in many centers there is room for improvement of the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":13932,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988231214934","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients requiring postcardiotomy veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A-ECMO) have a high risk of early mortality. In this analysis, we evaluated whether any interinstitutional difference exists in the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.

Methods: Studies on postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO were identified through a systematic review for individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis. Analysis of interinstitutional results was performed using direct standardization, estimation of observed/expected in-hospital mortality ratio and propensity score matching.

Results: Systematic review of the literature yielded 31 studies. Data from 10 studies on 1269 patients treated at 25 hospitals were available for the present analysis. In-hospital mortality was 66.7%. The relative risk of in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in six hospitals. Observed versus expected in-hospital mortality ratio showed that four hospitals were outliers with significantly increased mortality rates, and one hospital had significantly lower in-hospital mortality rate. Participating hospitals were classified as underperforming and overperforming hospitals if their observed/expected in-hospital mortality was higher or lower than 1.0, respectively. Among 395 propensity score matched pairs, the overperforming hospitals had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (60.3% vs 71.4%, p = 0.001) than underperforming hospitals. Low annual volume of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO tended to be predictive of poor outcome only when adjusted for patients' risk profile.

Conclusions: In-hospital mortality after postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO differed significantly between participating hospitals. These findings suggest that in many centers there is room for improvement of the results of postcardiotomy V-A-ECMO.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心肌梗死术后静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合术后疗效的机构间分析。
简介需要进行心肌切开术后静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(V-A-ECMO)的患者早期死亡的风险很高。在这项分析中,我们评估了心肌切开术后 V-A-ECMO 的结果是否存在机构间差异:方法:通过对患者个体数据(IPD)荟萃分析的系统性回顾,确定了有关心肌切开术后 V-A-ECMO 的研究。采用直接标准化、估计观察/预期院内死亡率和倾向评分匹配等方法对机构间结果进行分析:结果:对文献进行系统回顾后得出了 31 项研究结果。本分析可获得 10 项研究的数据,这些数据涉及 25 家医院治疗的 1269 名患者。院内死亡率为 66.7%。六家医院的院内死亡率相对风险明显更高。观察到的院内死亡率与预期的院内死亡率之比显示,有四家医院属于异常值,死亡率明显升高,一家医院的院内死亡率明显降低。如果参与医院的观察/预期院内死亡率分别高于或低于 1.0,则将其分为表现不佳医院和表现不佳医院。在 395 对倾向得分匹配的医院中,表现优异的医院的院内死亡率(60.3% vs 71.4%,p = 0.001)明显低于表现不佳的医院。只有在对患者的风险状况进行调整后,心肌梗死术后V-A-ECMO的年手术量低才有可能预测不良预后:结论:参与研究的医院之间在心肌梗死术后V-A-ECMO的院内死亡率方面存在显著差异。这些研究结果表明,在许多中心,开胸术后V-A-ECMO的效果还有待提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Organs
International Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Artificial Organs (IJAO) publishes peer-reviewed research and clinical, experimental and theoretical, contributions to the field of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs. The mission of the IJAO is to foster the development and optimization of artificial, bioartificial and tissue-engineered organs, for implantation or use in procedures, to treat functional deficits of all human tissues and organs.
期刊最新文献
Design of eye phantom for optical coherence tomography angiography study. Correlation between circulating dephosphorylated uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein and vascular calcification in peritoneal dialysis patients. Investigation of the acute effect of the synthetic hemodialysis membrane on the expression of XRCC1 and PARP1 in chronic hemodialysis patients. Dynamic modeling of variable speed left ventricular assist devices coupled to the cardiovascular system. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ameliorate hepatic injury in brain death rat donors with hemodynamic instability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1