Efficacy of Preventing Relapse Evaluated by a Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Study of Escitalopram in Japanese Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1089/cap.2023.0048
Takuya Saito, Hidetoshi Takahashi, Noa Tsujii, Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Yuta Yamaguchi, Masahiro Takatsu, Masaki Sato
{"title":"Efficacy of Preventing Relapse Evaluated by a Multicenter Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Study of Escitalopram in Japanese Adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder.","authors":"Takuya Saito, Hidetoshi Takahashi, Noa Tsujii, Tsuyoshi Sasaki, Yuta Yamaguchi, Masahiro Takatsu, Masaki Sato","doi":"10.1089/cap.2023.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram (ESC) in a 48-week relapse prevention study in Japanese adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This was a 48-week multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group study of patients aged 12-17 years with MDD. Patients received ESC for 12 weeks as an open-label treatment period (open-label period). Patients who achieved criteria for remission or response in the open-label period received either ESC or placebo for 36 weeks as a double-blind treatment period (double-blind period). The primary endpoint was the time to relapse during the double-blind period. Safety was evaluated in terms of type, incidence, and severity of adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 128 patients who entered the open-label period, 80 patients entered the double-blind period, all of whom were in the primary analysis population. The primary endpoint, time to relapse, was marginally less than statistically significant between the ESC and placebo groups (<i>p</i> = 0.051, log-rank test). In the Cox proportional hazards model, the estimated hazard ratio [two-sided 95% confidence interval] for relapse in the placebo group versus the ESC group was 2.96 [0.94, 9.30]. There were statistically significant differences between the ESC and placebo groups in several secondary endpoints (change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised, change in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale, etc.). No notable safety/tolerability issues were observed in this study compared with the results of studies in Japanese adults with MDD. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Superiority of ESC over placebo for relapse prevention in Japanese adolescents aged 12-17 years with MDD could not be verified with time to relapse evaluated by log-rank test. However, secondary endpoint results and a <i>post hoc</i> analysis of time to relapse suggest that ESC may be effective in preventing MDD relapse. No notable safety/tolerability issues were observed compared with the results of studies in Japanese adults with MDD. Study Registry Number: jRCT2080224520.</p>","PeriodicalId":15277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10733774/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2023.0048","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of escitalopram (ESC) in a 48-week relapse prevention study in Japanese adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: This was a 48-week multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group study of patients aged 12-17 years with MDD. Patients received ESC for 12 weeks as an open-label treatment period (open-label period). Patients who achieved criteria for remission or response in the open-label period received either ESC or placebo for 36 weeks as a double-blind treatment period (double-blind period). The primary endpoint was the time to relapse during the double-blind period. Safety was evaluated in terms of type, incidence, and severity of adverse events. Results: Of the 128 patients who entered the open-label period, 80 patients entered the double-blind period, all of whom were in the primary analysis population. The primary endpoint, time to relapse, was marginally less than statistically significant between the ESC and placebo groups (p = 0.051, log-rank test). In the Cox proportional hazards model, the estimated hazard ratio [two-sided 95% confidence interval] for relapse in the placebo group versus the ESC group was 2.96 [0.94, 9.30]. There were statistically significant differences between the ESC and placebo groups in several secondary endpoints (change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised, change in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale, etc.). No notable safety/tolerability issues were observed in this study compared with the results of studies in Japanese adults with MDD. Conclusions: Superiority of ESC over placebo for relapse prevention in Japanese adolescents aged 12-17 years with MDD could not be verified with time to relapse evaluated by log-rank test. However, secondary endpoint results and a post hoc analysis of time to relapse suggest that ESC may be effective in preventing MDD relapse. No notable safety/tolerability issues were observed compared with the results of studies in Japanese adults with MDD. Study Registry Number: jRCT2080224520.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本青少年重度抑郁症患者服用艾司西酞普兰的多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照戒药研究评估了预防复发的疗效。
研究目的在一项为期 48 周的重度抑郁障碍(MDD)日本青少年复发预防研究中,评估艾司西酞普兰(ESC)的疗效和安全性。研究方法这是一项为期 48 周的多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照平行组研究,研究对象为 12-17 岁的重度抑郁症患者。患者接受为期12周的ESC开放标签治疗(开放标签期)。在开放标签期达到缓解或应答标准的患者接受为期36周的ESC或安慰剂双盲治疗(双盲期)。主要终点是双盲期间的复发时间。安全性根据不良反应的类型、发生率和严重程度进行评估。研究结果在进入开放标签期的 128 名患者中,有 80 名患者进入了双盲期,他们都在主要分析人群中。主要终点(复发时间)在 ESC 组和安慰剂组之间的差异略低于统计学意义(p = 0.051,log-rank 检验)。在 Cox 比例危险模型中,安慰剂组与 ESC 组复发的估计危险比[双侧 95% 置信区间]为 2.96 [0.94, 9.30]。在几个次要终点(儿童抑郁评分量表修订版的变化、临床总体印象-严重程度量表的变化等)上,ESC组与安慰剂组之间存在统计学意义上的显著差异。与日本成人多发性抑郁症患者的研究结果相比,本研究未发现明显的安全性/耐受性问题。结论通过对数秩检验评估复发时间,无法证实ESC在预防12-17岁日本青少年MDD复发方面优于安慰剂。不过,次要终点结果和对复发时间的事后分析表明,ESC可有效预防MDD复发。与日本成年 MDD 患者的研究结果相比,没有发现明显的安全性/耐受性问题。研究登记号:jRCT2080224520。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (JCAP) is the premier peer-reviewed journal covering the clinical aspects of treating this patient population with psychotropic medications including side effects and interactions, standard doses, and research on new and existing medications. The Journal includes information on related areas of medical sciences such as advances in developmental pharmacokinetics, developmental neuroscience, metabolism, nutrition, molecular genetics, and more. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology coverage includes: New drugs and treatment strategies including the use of psycho-stimulants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, mood stabilizers, and atypical antipsychotics New developments in the diagnosis and treatment of ADHD, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, autism spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, along with other disorders Reports of common and rare Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) including: hyperprolactinemia, galactorrhea, weight gain/loss, metabolic syndrome, dyslipidemia, switching phenomena, sudden death, and the potential increase of suicide. Outcomes research.
期刊最新文献
Letter: Mirtazapine-Associated Hyperkinetic Movements in a 17-Year-Old with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Chronic Catatonia: A Case Report. From the Editor-in-Chief's Desk: Gratitude for Mentors and Colleagues. Deprescribing Antidepressants in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Discontinuation Approaches, Cross-Titration, and Withdrawal Symptoms. Naltrexone Treatment for Multiple Substance Use Disorders in an Adolescent Boy. Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medication in Youth at Winnebago Mental Health Institute: A Clinical Pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1