Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.

IF 1.5 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1177/17470218231220752
Andriana L Christofalos, Madison Laks, Stephanie Wolfer, Elisa C Dias, Daniel C Javitt, Heather Sheridan
{"title":"Lower-level oculomotor deficits in schizophrenia during multi-line reading: Evidence from return-sweeps.","authors":"Andriana L Christofalos, Madison Laks, Stephanie Wolfer, Elisa C Dias, Daniel C Javitt, Heather Sheridan","doi":"10.1177/17470218231220752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reading fluency deficits in schizophrenia (Sz) have been attributed to dysfunction in both lower-level, oculomotor processing and higher-level, lexical processing, according to the two-hit deficit model. Given that prior work examining reading deficits in individuals with Sz has primarily focused on single-line and single-word reading tasks, eye movements that are unique to passage reading, such as return-sweep saccades, have not yet been examined in Sz. Return-sweep saccades are large eye movements that are made when readers move from the end of one line to the beginning of the next line during natural passage reading. Examining return-sweeps provides an opportunity to examine lower-level, oculomotor deficits during reading under circumstances when upcoming higher-level, lexical information is not available for visual processing because visual acuity constraints do not permit detailed lexical processing of line-initial words when return-sweeps are programmed. To examine the source of reading deficits in Sz, we analysed an existing data set in which participants read multi-line passages with manipulations to line spacing. Readers with Sz made significantly more return-sweep targeting errors followed by corrective saccades compared with healthy controls. Both groups showed similar effects of line spacing on return-sweep targeting accuracy, suggesting similar sensitivities to visual crowding during reading. Furthermore, the patterns of fixation durations in readers with Sz corroborate prior work indicating reduced parafoveal processing of upcoming words. Together, these findings suggest that lower-level visual and oculomotor dysfunction contribute to reading deficits in Sz, providing support for the two-hit deficit model.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11214805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231220752","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading fluency deficits in schizophrenia (Sz) have been attributed to dysfunction in both lower-level, oculomotor processing and higher-level, lexical processing, according to the two-hit deficit model. Given that prior work examining reading deficits in individuals with Sz has primarily focused on single-line and single-word reading tasks, eye movements that are unique to passage reading, such as return-sweep saccades, have not yet been examined in Sz. Return-sweep saccades are large eye movements that are made when readers move from the end of one line to the beginning of the next line during natural passage reading. Examining return-sweeps provides an opportunity to examine lower-level, oculomotor deficits during reading under circumstances when upcoming higher-level, lexical information is not available for visual processing because visual acuity constraints do not permit detailed lexical processing of line-initial words when return-sweeps are programmed. To examine the source of reading deficits in Sz, we analysed an existing data set in which participants read multi-line passages with manipulations to line spacing. Readers with Sz made significantly more return-sweep targeting errors followed by corrective saccades compared with healthy controls. Both groups showed similar effects of line spacing on return-sweep targeting accuracy, suggesting similar sensitivities to visual crowding during reading. Furthermore, the patterns of fixation durations in readers with Sz corroborate prior work indicating reduced parafoveal processing of upcoming words. Together, these findings suggest that lower-level visual and oculomotor dysfunction contribute to reading deficits in Sz, providing support for the two-hit deficit model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快讯精神分裂症患者在多行阅读时的低级眼球运动障碍:来自回扫的证据。
精神分裂症(Schizophrenia,Sz)患者的阅读流畅性缺陷被归因于低层次的眼球运动处理和高层次的词汇处理功能障碍,根据2-hit缺陷模型(Dias等人,2021年),精神分裂症患者的阅读流畅性缺陷被归因于低层次的眼球运动处理和高层次的词汇处理功能障碍。鉴于之前研究 Sz 阅读障碍的工作主要集中在单行和单字的阅读任务上,因此尚未对 Sz 的眼球运动(如回扫眼球)进行研究。回扫眼动是读者在自然段落阅读过程中从一行的末尾移动到下一行的开头时所产生的大眼动。由于视觉敏锐度的限制,在设置回扫动作时无法对行首词进行详细的词汇处理,因此回扫动作提供了一个机会,可以在即将到来的较高层次词汇信息无法用于视觉处理的情况下,研究阅读过程中较低层次的眼球运动障碍。为了研究 Sz 阅读障碍的根源,我们分析了现有的一个数据集(Dias 等人,2021 年),其中参与者在阅读多行段落时对行距进行了处理。与健康对照组相比,患有斯氏综合症的读者在出现回扫瞄准错误后,会出现更多的矫正性囊视。两组受试者的行间距对回扫定位准确性的影响相似,这表明他们在阅读过程中对视觉拥挤的敏感性相似。此外,患有 Sz 的读者的定影持续时间模式也与之前的研究结果相吻合,表明他们对即将出现的单词的视网膜旁处理减少。这些发现共同表明,较低水平的视觉和眼球运动功能障碍导致了 Sz 的阅读障碍,为 2-hit 缺陷模型提供了支持(Dias 等人,2021 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
期刊最新文献
Incremental structure building in the processing of ellipsis. Negative or positive left or right? The influence of attribute label position on IAT effects in picture-word IATs and word IATs. Prior multisensory learning can facilitate auditory-only voice-identity and speech recognition in noise. Visual letter similarity effects in Korean word recognition: The role of distinctive strokes. EXPRESS: On prior visual experience in mental map navigation using allocentric and egocentric perspectives in the visually impaired
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1