Analysis of tip malposition and correction of peripherally inserted central catheters under ultrasound-guidance: 5-year outcomes from a single center.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1177/11297298231209564
Eunju Jang, Soo Mi Son, Ki-Yoon Moon, Seunghoon Lee, Hong Seok Han, Sun Cheol Park, Jang Yong Kim, Sang Seob Yun
{"title":"Analysis of tip malposition and correction of peripherally inserted central catheters under ultrasound-guidance: 5-year outcomes from a single center.","authors":"Eunju Jang, Soo Mi Son, Ki-Yoon Moon, Seunghoon Lee, Hong Seok Han, Sun Cheol Park, Jang Yong Kim, Sang Seob Yun","doi":"10.1177/11297298231209564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has become a common procedure. Although ultrasound (US)-guidance has improved success rates, a small percentage of malposition is inevitable. The purpose of our study is to evaluate malposition rates of US-guided bedside PICC catheter insertion, and the clinical factors associated with malposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating 5981 patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided bedside PICC placement from January 2017 to December 2021 at a single tertiary center. Final tip location was confirmed on chest radiograph.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were categorized into optimal, suboptimal, and malposition groups according to final tip location. 4866 cases (81.7%) showed optimal tip position, 790 (13.3%) were suboptimal, and 299 (5.0%) were malpositioned. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables associated with tip malposition; height (odds ratio (OR) 1.044; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.028-1.061; <i>p</i> < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.051; 95% CI, 1.017-1.087; <i>p</i> = 0.003), prior failure at accessing peripheral intravenous (IV) access (OR 1.718; 95% CI, 1.215-2.428; <i>p</i> = 0.002), side of the arm (OR 3.467; 95% CI, 2.457-4.891; <i>p</i> < 0.001), length of the catheter (OR 0.763; 95% CI, 0.734-0.794; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and number of previous central catheter insertions (OR 1.069; 95% CI, 1.004-1.140; <i>p</i> = 0.038). Malpositioned catheters were corrected by either bedside repositioning, bedside reinsertion, fluoroscopic reinsertion, switching to jugular catheters or catheter removal. No patient related factors were significantly associated with malposition or success of reposition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US-guidance can help reduce catheter malposition during bedside PICC insertion. Patients with risk factors such as multiple previous central vein insertions, failed peripheral line insertions, left arm insertion, or high BMI should undergo thorough sonographic evaluation of the arm vessels to prevent malposition.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231209564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has become a common procedure. Although ultrasound (US)-guidance has improved success rates, a small percentage of malposition is inevitable. The purpose of our study is to evaluate malposition rates of US-guided bedside PICC catheter insertion, and the clinical factors associated with malposition.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating 5981 patients who had undergone ultrasound-guided bedside PICC placement from January 2017 to December 2021 at a single tertiary center. Final tip location was confirmed on chest radiograph.

Results: Patients were categorized into optimal, suboptimal, and malposition groups according to final tip location. 4866 cases (81.7%) showed optimal tip position, 790 (13.3%) were suboptimal, and 299 (5.0%) were malpositioned. Logistic regression analysis identified six variables associated with tip malposition; height (odds ratio (OR) 1.044; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.028-1.061; p < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.051; 95% CI, 1.017-1.087; p = 0.003), prior failure at accessing peripheral intravenous (IV) access (OR 1.718; 95% CI, 1.215-2.428; p = 0.002), side of the arm (OR 3.467; 95% CI, 2.457-4.891; p < 0.001), length of the catheter (OR 0.763; 95% CI, 0.734-0.794; p < 0.001), and number of previous central catheter insertions (OR 1.069; 95% CI, 1.004-1.140; p = 0.038). Malpositioned catheters were corrected by either bedside repositioning, bedside reinsertion, fluoroscopic reinsertion, switching to jugular catheters or catheter removal. No patient related factors were significantly associated with malposition or success of reposition.

Conclusion: US-guidance can help reduce catheter malposition during bedside PICC insertion. Patients with risk factors such as multiple previous central vein insertions, failed peripheral line insertions, left arm insertion, or high BMI should undergo thorough sonographic evaluation of the arm vessels to prevent malposition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析超声引导下外周置入中心导管的尖端错位和矫正:单个中心的 5 年疗效。
背景:外周置入中心导管(PICC)已成为一种常见手术。尽管在超声(US)引导下成功率有所提高,但仍不可避免地会有一小部分导管错位。我们的研究旨在评估 US 引导下床旁 PICC 导管插入的错位率,以及与错位相关的临床因素:这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在一家三级医院接受超声引导床旁 PICC 置管的 5981 例患者。最终尖端位置由胸片确认:根据最终尖端位置将患者分为最佳组、次佳组和置管不良组。4866例(81.7%)患者的尖端位置最佳,790例(13.3%)患者的尖端位置欠佳,299例(5.0%)患者的尖端位置不正。逻辑回归分析确定了与尖端位置不正相关的六个变量:身高(比值比 (OR) 1.044;95% 置信区间 (CI),1.028-1.061;P P = 0.003)、先前外周静脉 (IV) 入路失败(OR 1.718;95% CI,1.215-2.428;P = 0.002)、手臂一侧(OR 3.467;95% CI,2.457-4.891;P P = 0.038)。导管错位的纠正方法包括床旁重新定位、床旁重新插入、透视重新插入、改用颈静脉导管或移除导管。患者相关因素与导管错位或重新定位的成功率均无明显关系:结论:在床旁插入 PICC 时,US 引导有助于减少导管错位。有风险因素的患者,如曾多次插入中心静脉、外周管路插入失败、左臂插入或体重指数高的患者,应接受彻底的手臂血管超声评估,以防止导管错位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
期刊最新文献
First successful use of translocated autologous great saphenous vein to the upper arm for hemodialysis access in Vietnam: A 3-year follow-up case report. Femoral venous access: State of the art and future perspectives. Elimination of bleeding after tunnelled catheter removal by modified technique in practice. Integrated short peripheral intravenous cannulas and risk of catheter failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Comparison of procedural time with two different ultrasound-guided approaches for dorsalis pedis artery cannulation in adult patients: A randomized trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1