Predictors of clinical worsening during a discontinuation trial of serotonin reuptake inhibitors for obsessive compulsive disorder

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Anxiety Disorders Pub Date : 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102805
Jeremy Tyler , Thea Gallagher , Michael G. Wheaton , Gabriella E. Hamlett , Ben Rosenfield , David Rosenfield , Helen B. Simpson , Edna B. Foa
{"title":"Predictors of clinical worsening during a discontinuation trial of serotonin reuptake inhibitors for obsessive compulsive disorder","authors":"Jeremy Tyler ,&nbsp;Thea Gallagher ,&nbsp;Michael G. Wheaton ,&nbsp;Gabriella E. Hamlett ,&nbsp;Ben Rosenfield ,&nbsp;David Rosenfield ,&nbsp;Helen B. Simpson ,&nbsp;Edna B. Foa","doi":"10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore predictors and moderators of clinical worsening during a double-blind trial in which patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were randomized to either continue or discontinue their Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SRI) medication after achieving wellness from the addition of exposure and response prevention (EX/RP) therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>The data came from a double-blind discontinuation trial that included N = 101 participants, 35 of whom were removed from the study due to clinical worsening. We first used LASSO logistic regression to identify which of the 34 potential baseline variables of interest (including demographics, diagnoses, other relevant clinical constructs, and specific genotypes), might moderate or predict this clinical worsening. Then logistic regression was used to examine which of these identified variables were </span><em>significantly</em> related to later clinical worsening. We verified the validity of our final prediction model using k-fold cross-validation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was one significant predictor of clinical worsening: In both groups, those with more past diagnoses had a greater likelihood of clinical worsening (p = .015). There were several moderators. Rates of clinical worsening were higher in the Discontinuation group compared to the Continuation group for participants who were taking a shorter half-life SRI (p = .044), were female (p = .022), had higher baseline levels of maladaptive metacognitions (p &lt; .001), had fewer sleep problems at baseline (p = .001), and/or had more years of education (p &lt; .001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our results identified several factors that may predict the development of clinical worsening in OCD patients discontinuing SRI medication following successful EX/RP treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48390,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102805"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anxiety Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887618523001433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore predictors and moderators of clinical worsening during a double-blind trial in which patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) were randomized to either continue or discontinue their Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SRI) medication after achieving wellness from the addition of exposure and response prevention (EX/RP) therapy.

Method

The data came from a double-blind discontinuation trial that included N = 101 participants, 35 of whom were removed from the study due to clinical worsening. We first used LASSO logistic regression to identify which of the 34 potential baseline variables of interest (including demographics, diagnoses, other relevant clinical constructs, and specific genotypes), might moderate or predict this clinical worsening. Then logistic regression was used to examine which of these identified variables were significantly related to later clinical worsening. We verified the validity of our final prediction model using k-fold cross-validation.

Results

There was one significant predictor of clinical worsening: In both groups, those with more past diagnoses had a greater likelihood of clinical worsening (p = .015). There were several moderators. Rates of clinical worsening were higher in the Discontinuation group compared to the Continuation group for participants who were taking a shorter half-life SRI (p = .044), were female (p = .022), had higher baseline levels of maladaptive metacognitions (p < .001), had fewer sleep problems at baseline (p = .001), and/or had more years of education (p < .001).

Conclusions

Our results identified several factors that may predict the development of clinical worsening in OCD patients discontinuing SRI medication following successful EX/RP treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂治疗强迫症停药期间临床恶化的预测因素
目的在一项双盲试验中,探讨强迫症(OCD)患者临床恶化的预测因素和调节因素。在该试验中,强迫症(OCD)患者在接受暴露和反应预防(EX/RP)治疗后恢复健康,随机分为继续或停止5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SRI)治疗。方法数据来自一项双盲停药试验,包括N=101名受试者,其中35名因临床恶化而退出研究。我们首先使用LASSO逻辑回归来确定34个潜在的基线变量(包括人口统计学、诊断、其他相关临床结构和特定基因型)中哪些可能缓解或预测这种临床恶化。然后使用逻辑回归来检验这些确定的变量中哪些与后来的临床恶化显著相关。我们使用k-fold交叉验证验证了最终预测模型的有效性。结果有一个显著的临床恶化预测因子:在两组中,既往诊断较多的患者临床恶化的可能性更大(p= 0.015)。有几个主持人。对于半衰期较短的SRI (p= 0.044)、女性(p= 0.022)、具有较高的适应不良元认知基线水平(p= 0.001)、基线时睡眠问题较少(p= 0.001)和/或受教育年数较高(p= 0.001)的参与者,停药组的临床恶化率高于继续组(p= 0.022)。结论我们的研究结果确定了几个可能预测强迫症患者在成功的EX/RP治疗后停止SRI治疗的临床恶化的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anxiety Disorders is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes research papers on all aspects of anxiety disorders for individuals of all age groups, including children, adolescents, adults, and the elderly. Manuscripts that focus on disorders previously classified as anxiety disorders such as obsessive-compulsive disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder, as well as the new category of illness anxiety disorder, are also within the scope of the journal. The research areas of focus include traditional, behavioral, cognitive, and biological assessment; diagnosis and classification; psychosocial and psychopharmacological treatment; genetics; epidemiology; and prevention. The journal welcomes theoretical and review articles that significantly contribute to current knowledge in the field. It is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Elsevier, BIOBASE, PubMed/Medline, PsycINFO, BIOSIS Citation Index, BRS Data, Current Contents - Social & Behavioral Sciences, Pascal Francis, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Metacognitive therapy versus exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder – a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial” Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2024), Volume 104, June 2024, 102873 Excessive avoidance bias towards uncertain faces in non-clinical social anxiety individuals Interplay of serum BDNF levels and childhood adversity in predicting earlier-onset post-traumatic stress disorder: A two-year longitudinal study Negative emotion differentiation buffers against intergenerational risk for social anxiety in at-risk adolescent girls Intensive treatments for children and adolescents with anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1