Financing COVID-19 Deficits in Fiscally Dominant Economies: Is The Monetarist Arithmetic Unpleasant?

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS East Asian Economic Review Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.11644/kiep.eaer.2020.24.4.386
Martín Uribe
{"title":"Financing COVID-19 Deficits in Fiscally Dominant Economies: Is The Monetarist Arithmetic Unpleasant?","authors":"Martín Uribe","doi":"10.11644/kiep.eaer.2020.24.4.386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The coronavirus pandemic of 2019-20 confronted fiscally dominant regimes around the world with the question of whether the large deficits caused by the health crisis should be monetized or financed by issuing debt The unpleasant monetarist arithmetic of Sargent and Wallace (1981) states that in a fiscally dominant regime tighter money now can cause higher inflation in the future In spite of the qualifier 'unpleasant,' this result is positive in nature, and, therefore, void of normative content I analyze conditions under which it is optimal in a welfare sense for the central bank to delay inflation by issuing debt to finance part of the fiscal deficit The analysis is conducted in the context of a model in which the aforementioned monetarist arithmetic holds, in the sense that if the government finds it optimal to delay inflation, it does so knowing that it would result in higher inflation in the future The central result of the paper is that delaying inflation is optimal when the fiscal deficit is expected to decline over time [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of East Asian Economic Review (EAER) is the property of Korea Institute for International Economic Policy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )","PeriodicalId":41122,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Economic Review","volume":" 48","pages":"417-440"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11644/kiep.eaer.2020.24.4.386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic of 2019-20 confronted fiscally dominant regimes around the world with the question of whether the large deficits caused by the health crisis should be monetized or financed by issuing debt The unpleasant monetarist arithmetic of Sargent and Wallace (1981) states that in a fiscally dominant regime tighter money now can cause higher inflation in the future In spite of the qualifier 'unpleasant,' this result is positive in nature, and, therefore, void of normative content I analyze conditions under which it is optimal in a welfare sense for the central bank to delay inflation by issuing debt to finance part of the fiscal deficit The analysis is conducted in the context of a model in which the aforementioned monetarist arithmetic holds, in the sense that if the government finds it optimal to delay inflation, it does so knowing that it would result in higher inflation in the future The central result of the paper is that delaying inflation is optimal when the fiscal deficit is expected to decline over time [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of East Asian Economic Review (EAER) is the property of Korea Institute for International Economic Policy and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为财政主导经济体的COVID-19赤字融资:货币主义者的计算令人不快吗?
2019- 2020年的冠状病毒大流行使世界各地财政占主导地位的政权面临这样一个问题:卫生危机造成的巨额赤字是应该货币化,还是应该通过发行债务来融资。萨金特和华莱士(1981)令人不快的货币主义算法指出,在财政占主导地位的政权中,现在收紧的货币政策可能会导致未来更高的通货膨胀。我分析了央行通过发行债券来为部分财政赤字融资来延缓通货膨胀在福利意义上是最优的条件。分析是在上述货币主义算法成立的模型背景下进行的,从某种意义上说,如果政府发现延缓通货膨胀是最优的,它知道它会导致更高的通货膨胀在未来中央论文的结果是,推迟通货膨胀时最优财政赤字预计将下降随着时间的抽象从作者版权的东亚经济评论(衣料)是韩国对外经济政策研究院的性质及其内容不得复制或发送多个站点或者粘贴到其实没有版权持有人的书面许可,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用,本摘要可能会被删节,但不保证副本的准确性,用户应参考原始发布的完整摘要(版权适用于所有摘要)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Ebb and Flow of Regional Integration Vision in Asia-Pacific: From A Lens of Leaders’ Declarations over 30 Years Business Cycle Synchronization between the European Union and Korea The Impacts of Climate Variability on Household Consumption: Evidence Based on Village Weather Data in Indonesia In-Sample and Out-of-Sample Predictability of Cryptocurrency Returns Impact of Education on Multidimensional Poverty Reduction at the Post-Poverty Alleviation Era in Xinjiang
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1