Manus to Meanjin: A case study of refugee migration, polymorphic borders and Australian ‘imperialism’

IF 1 Q3 COMMUNICATION Pacific Journalism Review Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.24135/pjr.v27i1and2.1198
Kasun Ubayasiri
{"title":"Manus to Meanjin: A case study of refugee migration, polymorphic borders and Australian ‘imperialism’","authors":"Kasun Ubayasiri","doi":"10.24135/pjr.v27i1and2.1198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This non-traditional research article argues that the refugee and asylum-seeker protests in Brisbane’s Kangaroo Point between April 2, 2020 and April 14, 2021 can be viewed against a backdrop of Australian colonialism—where successive Australian governments have used former colonies in Nauru and Manus Island in Papua New Guinea as offshore detention facilities—as a dumping ground for asylum-seekers. Within the same context this article argues that the men’s removal to the Kangaroo Point Alternative Place of Detention is a continuation of this colonial policy of incarcerating ‘undesirables’ on occupied land, in this case on Meanjin—Jagera land identified by the colonial name of Brisbane. This extension of Australian sub-imperial and neo-colonial dominion and the imagining of its boundaries is viewed though the theoretical prism of a polymorphic border, a border that shifts and morphs depending on who attempts to cross it. In a departure from orthodox research practice, this article will use visual storytelling drawn from photojournalism praxis alongside more traditional text-based research prose.  In doing so, it will use photo-journalistic artifacts and the visual politics that surround them, as core dialogical components in the presentation of the article as opposed to using them as mere illustrations or props.","PeriodicalId":44137,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Journalism Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Journalism Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24135/pjr.v27i1and2.1198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This non-traditional research article argues that the refugee and asylum-seeker protests in Brisbane’s Kangaroo Point between April 2, 2020 and April 14, 2021 can be viewed against a backdrop of Australian colonialism—where successive Australian governments have used former colonies in Nauru and Manus Island in Papua New Guinea as offshore detention facilities—as a dumping ground for asylum-seekers. Within the same context this article argues that the men’s removal to the Kangaroo Point Alternative Place of Detention is a continuation of this colonial policy of incarcerating ‘undesirables’ on occupied land, in this case on Meanjin—Jagera land identified by the colonial name of Brisbane. This extension of Australian sub-imperial and neo-colonial dominion and the imagining of its boundaries is viewed though the theoretical prism of a polymorphic border, a border that shifts and morphs depending on who attempts to cross it. In a departure from orthodox research practice, this article will use visual storytelling drawn from photojournalism praxis alongside more traditional text-based research prose.  In doing so, it will use photo-journalistic artifacts and the visual politics that surround them, as core dialogical components in the presentation of the article as opposed to using them as mere illustrations or props.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《给Meanjin的手抄本》:难民移民、多态边界与澳大利亚“帝国主义”的个案研究
这篇非传统的研究文章认为,2020年4月2日至2021年4月14日在布里斯班袋鼠角(Kangaroo Point)发生的难民和寻求庇护者抗议活动,可以在澳大利亚殖民主义的背景下看待——历届澳大利亚政府都将瑙鲁和巴布亚新几内亚马努斯岛(Manus Island)的前殖民地用作离岸拘留设施——作为寻求庇护者的垃圾场。在同样的背景下,这篇文章认为,这些人被转移到袋鼠点替代拘留所是殖民政策的延续,即在被占领的土地上监禁“不受欢迎的人”,在这种情况下,在Meanjin-Jagera土地上,以布里斯班的殖民名称命名。澳大利亚次帝国主义和新殖民主义统治的延伸以及对其边界的想象,是通过一个多态边界的理论棱镜来看待的,这个边界会根据谁试图跨越它而变化和变形。与正统的研究实践不同,本文将使用从摄影新闻实践中提取的视觉叙事,以及更传统的基于文本的研究散文。在这样做的过程中,它将使用照片新闻的人工制品和围绕它们的视觉政治,作为文章呈现的核心对话组件,而不是仅仅将它们用作插图或道具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Journalism Review
Pacific Journalism Review COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: While one objective of Pacific Journalism Review is research into Pacific journalism theory and practice, the journal has also expanding its interest into new areas of research and inquiry that reflect the broader impact of contemporary media practice and education. A particular focus is on the cultural politics of the media, including the following issues: new media and social movements, indigenous cultures in the age of globalisation, the politics of tourism and development, the role of the media and the formation of national identity and the cultural influence of New Zealand as a branch of the global economy within the Pacific region. It also has a special interest in climate change, environmental and development studies in the media and communication and vernacular media in the region.
期刊最新文献
REVIEW: A fascinating, timely account of ABC ‘soft power’ OBITUARY: Shirley Shackleton: A Timor-Leste hero's quest for truth REVIEW: Award-winning account of Taranaki taonga’s long journey home Media, the courts, and terrorism: Lessons from the Christchurch mosque attacks OBITUARY: Jill Jolliffe: Running for her life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1