SMEs and the Innovation Management Process: A multi-level process conceptual framework

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Technology Innovation Management Review Pub Date : 2021-02-08 DOI:10.22215/timreview/1414
Angelo Dossou-Yovo,Christian Keen
{"title":"SMEs and the Innovation Management Process: A multi-level process conceptual framework","authors":"Angelo Dossou-Yovo,Christian Keen","doi":"10.22215/timreview/1414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation management in small businesses has been of interest to researchers for many years. One of the reasons is that innovation in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) occurs in a different way than in large companies. Small businesses face a resource challenge that differs from large companies. The ability to successfully manage the innovation process can be a particularly challenge for small businesses in high technology industries that need to innovate in order to survive. In the software industry, for example, research on innovation in small businesses tends to focus mainly on identifying resources (Romijn et al., 2002; Cho & Linderman, 2020; Harel et al., 2020), and seems to consider the process as a “black box” that ignores how the type, needs, and availability of resources arise throughout the innovation process (Pustovrh et al., 2017; McDowell et al., 2018). Interest in conceptualizing the innovation process has received attention by researchers from multiple disciplines such as technology management, engineering, and strategy. However, the focus tends to be on the process of new product development, with the majority of works focused on identifying organizational and strategic success factors (Dunne et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2018; Bailetti et al., 2020).","PeriodicalId":51569,"journal":{"name":"Technology Innovation Management Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"22-33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Innovation Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Innovation management in small businesses has been of interest to researchers for many years. One of the reasons is that innovation in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) occurs in a different way than in large companies. Small businesses face a resource challenge that differs from large companies. The ability to successfully manage the innovation process can be a particularly challenge for small businesses in high technology industries that need to innovate in order to survive. In the software industry, for example, research on innovation in small businesses tends to focus mainly on identifying resources (Romijn et al., 2002; Cho & Linderman, 2020; Harel et al., 2020), and seems to consider the process as a “black box” that ignores how the type, needs, and availability of resources arise throughout the innovation process (Pustovrh et al., 2017; McDowell et al., 2018). Interest in conceptualizing the innovation process has received attention by researchers from multiple disciplines such as technology management, engineering, and strategy. However, the focus tends to be on the process of new product development, with the majority of works focused on identifying organizational and strategic success factors (Dunne et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2018; Bailetti et al., 2020).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中小企业与创新管理过程:多层次过程概念框架
多年来,研究人员一直对小型企业的创新管理感兴趣。其中一个原因是,中小企业(SMEs)的创新发生的方式与大公司不同。小企业面临着与大公司不同的资源挑战。成功管理创新过程的能力对于需要创新才能生存的高科技行业的小企业来说是一个特别的挑战。例如,在软件行业,对小企业创新的研究往往主要集中在识别资源上(Romijn et al., 2002;Cho & Linderman, 2020;Harel等人,2020),并且似乎将这一过程视为一个“黑箱”,忽略了在整个创新过程中资源的类型、需求和可用性是如何出现的(Pustovrh等人,2017;McDowell et al., 2018)。对创新过程概念化的兴趣受到了来自技术管理、工程和战略等多个学科的研究人员的关注。然而,重点往往是新产品开发的过程,与大多数工作集中在确定组织和战略成功因素(Dunne等人,2016;Kim et al., 2018;Bailetti et al., 2020)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Employment of highly-skilled migrants during the pandemic: Focus on internal migration in Indonesia. Editorial: Blockchain and Digital Transformation Can Blockchain Improve Healthcare Management? Interview: Blockchain and Digital Transformation in Financial Services, Part I Coping with the Double-Edged Sword of Data-Sharing in Ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1